Novel 5-point 18-FDG-PET/CT visual scoring system for assessing treatment response in patients with oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic utility and reproducibility of a qualitative 5-point 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET primary visual score (PVS) in patients with oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients with histologically proven oesophageal or GOJ cancer who received curative intent therapy. Clinical, pathological and imaging data were extracted from electronic medical records. Patients were required to have pre-treatment and post-treatment FDG-PET scans, that were evaluated with a 5-point primary visual score (prePVS, postPVS). The changes in PVS (ΔPVS) were correlated with progression-free survival and overall survival. Interobserver variability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa intraclass correlation and agreement. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were retrospectively identified. Two (3%), 36 (54%) and 29 (43%) of the patients had stage I, II and III disease respectively. Twenty-five (37%) patients had squamous cell carcinoma. Thirty-seven (55%) patients proceeded onto surgical resection. postPVS was associated with both PFS (P = 0.013) and OS (P = 0.0002). ΔPVS predicted for PFS (P = 0.002) and OS (P = 0.0003). When thresholds of response were considered, agreement was 80.6% (K = 0.78) and 74.6% (K = 0.69) for postPVS and ΔPVS respectively. CONCLUSION: Qualitative assessment of oesophageal and GOJ cancers utilising FDG-PET is reproducible and may be able to prognosticate outcomes in patients undergoing treatment. Prospective validation is required.

Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.

INTRODUCTION: Hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) in the setting of early invasive breast cancer has been shown to have similar local control rates and cosmetic outcomes as conventionally fractionated RT. This study compares ipsilateral recurrence rates between hypofractionated and conventional RT, with and without a boost. The effect of hypofractionated RT and chest wall separation (CWS) on cosmetic outcome was also assessed. METHODS: All patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated between 1998 and 2012 across two sites of a single cancer institution were retrospectively studied. Patients were analysed according to those receiving conventional RT (≤2 Gy per fraction) and those receiving hypofractionated RT (>2 Gy per fraction), as well as the presence or absence of a tumour bed boost. Data were collected through electronic medical records and local cancer registry. Cosmetic outcome was scored by physicians on a four-point scale during clinical follow-up appointments. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-seven patients were treated for DCIS during the study period. One hundred and forty-one were treated with conventional RT, and 56 with hypofractionated RT. After a median follow up of 4.4 years, there were 12 ipsilateral recurrences, of which seven were invasive disease and five DCIS. Ten recurrences occurred in patients who received conventional RT (7.1% recurrence rate) and two in those who received hypofractionated RT (3.6% recurrence rate) (P = 0.48). Cosmetic outcomes were not significantly different between conventional and hypofractionated RT (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionation represents a suitable alternative for treating DCIS in the absence of randomised data.

The effects of low- and high-dose-rate brachytherapy on depressive symptoms in prostate cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of depressive symptoms between prostate cancer (PCa) patients who have received low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRB) and those receiving high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB). METHOD: Direct comparisons were made between the prevalence of the DSM-IV-TR symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) based upon Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale responses and patients' records on 164 PCa patients from Queensland, Australia. RESULTS: HDRB patients had significantly greater frequency of self-reported symptoms of crying (or feeling like it) (MDD criterion 1), and restlessness and inability to sit still (MDD criterion 5), and a nonsignificant trend towards more frequent fatigue (MDD criterion 7). There was no significant association between fatigue and having received hormone therapy. CONCLUSION: These three MDD symptoms, which include one of the two alternative key required symptoms (criterion 1), suggest that HDRB PCa patients may present with clinically significantly different depression profiles from their peers who receive LDRB. Treatment choices need to be focused upon possible serotonergic dysfunction as well as somatic complaints of depression. The presence of subsyndromal depression in HDRB patients also warrants consideration.