A Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic Study of Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-Release Capsules Following Oral Administration with Orange Juice, Water, or Omeprazole in Cystinosis.

INTRODUCTION: Cystinosis is a rare, metabolic, autosomal recessive, genetic lysosomal storage disorder characterized by an accumulation of cystine in various organs and tissues. Cysteamine bitartrate (CB) is a cystine-depleting aminothiol agent approved in the United States and Europe in immediate-release and delayed-release (DR) formulations for the treatment of nephropathic cystinosis in children and adults. It is recommended that CBDR be administered with fruit juice (except grapefruit juice) for maximum absorption. Omeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor that inhibits gastric acid secretion and, theoretically, may cause the premature release of cysteamine by increasing intragastric pH, thereby affecting the PK of CBDR. METHODS: This open-label, three-period, randomized study in healthy adult subjects was designed primarily to compare the pharmacokinetics of CBDR capsules after a single oral dose administered with orange juice, water, or multiple oral doses of omeprazole with water at steady state. A total of 32 subjects were randomly assigned to receive study agents in one of two treatment sequences. RESULTS: All subjects completed the study and baseline characteristics of the overall population and the two treatment sequence populations were similar. Peak mean plasma cysteamine concentrations following co-administration of CBDR capsules with orange juice (1892 ng/mL) were higher compared with co-administration with water (1663 ng/mL) or omeprazole 20 mg and water (1712 ng/mL). Mean time to peak plasma concentration was shorter with omeprazole co-administration (2.5 h) compared with orange juice (3.5 h) or water (3.0 h). Statistical comparisons between treatment groups indicated that exposure as assessed by AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, and Cmax were all within the 80-125% bioequivalence ranges for all comparisons. All treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Overall, the pharmacokinetics of cysteamine bitartrate DR capsules are not significantly impacted by co-administration with orange juice, water only, or omeprazole (with water). FUNDING: Horizon Pharma, Inc.

Pharmacokinetics of neratinib during coadministration with lansoprazole in healthy subjects.

AIMS: To evaluate the effect of lansoprazole, a proton-pump inhibitor, on the absorption, pharmacokinetics, and safety of neratinib, a pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was an open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence study. Fifteen healthy adult subjects received a single oral dose of neratinib 240 mg (Period 1), followed by a washout period, then oral lansoprazole 30 mg once daily for 7 days and a single dose of neratinib 240 mg on Day 5 (Period 2). Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed for 72 h following each neratinib dose. Plasma neratinib concentration-time data were analysed using noncompartmental methods. Geometric mean ratios for AUC0-t , AUC0-inf , and peak plasma concentrations (Cmax ) for neratinib plus lansoprazole vs. neratinib were used to assess the magnitude of the drug-drug interaction if the 90% confidence intervals were outside 80.00-125.00%. RESULTS: Neratinib geometric least-squares mean (LSM) Cmax was reduced from 84.5 ng ml-1 with neratinib alone to 24.5 ng ml-1 with neratinib plus lansoprazole. The extent of exposure to neratinib was also decreased: geometric LSM AUC0-t was 1478 ng ml-1  h with neratinib vs. 426 ng ml-1  h with neratinib plus lansoprazole, and geometric LSM AUC0-inf was 1557 ng ml-1  h vs. 542 ng ml-1  h, respectively. Mean t½ was similar with both treatments (approximately 14 h). Geometric mean ratios 90% confidence intervals for AUC0-t , AUC0-inf and Cmax fell outside the prespecified equivalence range (80.0-125.0%). Treatment-emergent adverse events, all mild, were reported by five (33%) subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of lansoprazole with neratinib reduced the rate and extent of neratinib exposure in healthy subjects.

Improved pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan with Breath Powered™ nasal delivery of sumatriptan powder.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to directly compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of 22-mg sumatriptan powder delivered intranasally with a novel Breath Powered™ device (11 mg in each nostril) vs a 20-mg sumatriptan liquid nasal spray, a 100-mg oral tablet, and a 6-mg subcutaneous injection. BACKGROUND: A prior PK study found that low doses of sumatriptan powder delivered intranasally with a Breath Powered device were efficiently and rapidly absorbed. An early phase clinical trial with the same device and doses found excellent tolerability with high response rates and rapid onset of pain relief, approaching the benefits of injection despite significantly lower predicted drug levels. METHODS: An open-label, cross-over, comparative bioavailability study was conducted in 20 healthy subjects at a single center in the USA. Following randomization, fasted subjects received a single dose of each of the 4 treatments separated by a 7-day washout. Blood samples were taken pre-dose and serially over 14 hours post-dose for PK analysis. RESULTS: Quantitative measurement of residuals in used Breath Powered devices demonstrated that the devices delivered 8±0.9 mg (mean±standard deviation) of sumatriptan powder in each nostril (total dose 16 mg). Although the extent of systemic exposure over 14 hours was similar following Breath Powered delivery of 16-mg sumatriptan powder and 20-mg liquid nasal spray (area under the curve [AUC]0-∞ 64.9 ng*hour/mL vs 61.1 ng*hour/mL), sumatriptan powder, despite a 20% lower dose, produced 27% higher peak exposure (Cmax 20.8 ng/mL vs 16.4 ng/mL) and 61% higher exposure in the first 30 minutes compared with the nasal spray (AUC0-30 minutes 5.8 ng*hour/mL vs 3.6 ng*hour/mL). The magnitude of difference is larger on a per-milligram basis. The absorption profile following standard nasal spray demonstrated bimodal peaks, consistent with lower early followed by higher later absorptions. In contrast, the profile following Breath Powered delivery showed higher early and lower late absorptions. Relative to the 100-mg oral tablet (Cmax 70.2 ng/mL, AUC0-∞, 308.8 ng*hour/mL) and 6-mg injection (Cmax 111.6 ng/mL, AUC0-∞ 128.2 ng*hour/mL), the peak and overall exposure following Breath Powered intranasal delivery of sumatriptan powder was substantially lower. CONCLUSIONS: Breath Powered intranasal delivery of sumatriptan powder is a more efficient form of drug delivery, producing a higher peak and earlier exposure with a lower delivered dose than nasal spray and faster absorption than either nasal spray or oral administration. It also produces a significantly lower peak and total systemic exposure than oral tablet or subcutaneous injection.

Achieving routine sub 30 minute door-to-balloon times in a high volume 24/7 primary angioplasty center with autonomous ambulance diagnosis and immediate catheter laboratory access.

BACKGROUND: In primary angioplasty (primary percutaneous coronary intervention [PPCI]) for acute myocardial infarction, institutional logistical delays can increase door-to-balloon times, resulting in increased mortality. METHODS: We moved from a thrombolysis (TL) service to 24/7 PPCI for direct access and interhospital transfer in April 2004. Using autonomous ambulance diagnosis with open access to the myocardial infarction center catheter laboratory, we compared reperfusion times and clinical outcomes for the final 2 years of TL with the first 3 years of PPCI. RESULTS: Comparison was made between TL (2002-2004, n = 185) and PPCI (2004-2007, n = 704); all times are medians in minutes (interquartile range): for TL, symptom to needle 153 (85-225), call to needle 58 (49-73), first professional contact (FPC) to needle 47 (39-63), door to needle 18 (12-30) (mortality: 7.6% at 30 days, 9.2% at 1 year); for interhospital transfer PPCI (n = 227), symptom to balloon 226 (175-350), call to balloon 135 (117-188), FPC to balloon 121 (102-166), first door-to-balloon 100 (80-142) (mortality: 7.0% at 30 days, 12.3% at 1 year); for direct-access PPCI (n = 477), symptom to balloon 142 (101-238), call to balloon 79 (70-93), FPC to balloon 69 (59-82), door to balloon 20 (16-29) (mortality: 4.6% at 30 days, 8.6% at 1 year). There was no difference between direct-access PPCI and TL times for symptom to needle/balloon. Direct-access PPCI was significantly quicker for the group than in-hospital thrombolysis for door to needle/balloon times due to the lack of any long wait patients (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Interhospital transfer remains slow even with rapid institutional door-to-balloon times. With autonomous ambulance diagnosis and open access direct to the catheter laboratory, a median door-to-balloon time of <30 minutes day and night was achieved, and >95% of patients were reperfused within 1 hour.

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of higher-dose mizoribine in healthy male volunteers.

AIMS: Mizoribine is an oral immunosuppressive agent approved in several countries for prevention of rejection in renal transplantation. Its therapeutic window is based on trough concentrations staying at > or =0.5 but <3 microg ml(-1). It has been postulated that as renal function returns to normal, higher doses may be needed to maintain efficacy than the current clinical dosage of 2-5 mg kg(-1) day(-1). The safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics from two clinical trials of higher-dose mizoribine treatments in healthy male volunteers are presented. METHODS: Forty-eight healthy White male nonsmokers participated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials: 32 in a single-dose study (3, 6, 9 and 12 mg kg(-1)) and 16 in a multiple-dose study [6 mg kg(-1) day(-1) once daily for 5 days or twice daily (12 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) for 7 days]. Standard assessments of safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics were performed. RESULTS: The safety profiles of both studies were generally unremarkable, except for elevated serum uric acid concentrations at the highest dose (12 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) in the multiple-dose study. Orally administered mizoribine reached peak concentrations within 2-3 h and was eliminated mostly via the kidney (65-100% of dose) with a 3-h half-life. Only the 12 mg kg(-1) day(-1) group achieved trough concentrations that were within the therapeutic window. Conclusions Based on the favourable safety profile and current pharmacokinetic information, a new starting dose in the 6-12 mg kg(-1) day(-1) range is recommended in the up to 3 months acute phase following transplantation, with dose reduction recommended only if the function of the transplanted kidney is impaired.