Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry for the analysis of substituted and unsubstituted polycyclic aromatic compounds in environmental samples.

Polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) consists of multiple compounds and the number of theoretically possible isomers can reach into the thousands. Currently each PAC group is quantified collectively as a single group of compounds. However, individual PACs can reveal important information on how the PACs were formed and this information may be used to determine sources of PACs in environmental samples, It is hypothesized that many of the limitations with characterizing alkylated PACs with one dimensional gas-chromatography (1D GC) can be circumvented using GC × GC (two dimensional gas chromatography). Here we apply comprehensive GCxGC coupled to high-resolution time of flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC-HFTOF-MS) to aid in the separation, identification and quantitation of APACs in three environmental matrices: mussel tissue (Mytilus edulis), lubricating oil and coal. In the absence of authentic analytical standards, differences in the mass spectral fragmentation pattern of isomers were used to confirm the identity of isomers within a PAC group. The method was validated according to the EURACHEM guidelines and used to quantify a biological standard reference material (SRM 2974a). The method met all the standard method performance requirements such as trueness, precision and measurement of uncertainty and is fit for quantifying these compounds in biota. Furthermore, the method was used to identify and quantify additional PAC compounds in the SRM 2974a material which to date have not been certified. With appropriate statistical analytical tools, the described GC × GC method can be used as a tool for more robust source fingerprinting and source apportionment of PACs in the environment.

Inter-laboratory validation of a thin film microextraction technique for determination of pesticides in surface water samples.

The primary goal of the present study is the inter-laboratory evaluation of a thin film microextraction (TFME) technique to be used as an alternative approach to liquid-liquid extraction (LLE). Polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) and PDMS/DVB-carbon mesh supported membranes were used for the extraction of 23 targeted pesticides, while a thermal desorption unit (TDU) was employed to transfer these analytes to a GC/MS instrument for separation and detection. After optimization of the most critical parameters, both membranes were capable of achieving limits of detection (LOD) in the low ng L-1 range while demonstrating excellent robustness, withstanding up to 100 extractions/desorption cycles. Furthermore, limits of quantification (LOQ) between 0.025 and 0.50 µg L-1 were achieved for the 23 compounds selected from several classes of pesticides with a wide range of polarities. A wide linear range of 0.025-10.0 µg L-1 with strong correlation to response (R2 > 0.99) was attained for most of the studied analytes. Both membranes showed good accuracy and repeatability at three levels of concentration. Moreover, the method was also validated through blind split analyses of 18 surface water samples, collected within 3 months, using TFME at the University of Waterloo and LLE at Maxxam Analytics (Mississauga, ON) which is an accredited commercial analytical laboratory. Good agreement between the two methods was achieved with accuracy values ranging from 70 to 130%, for the majority of analytes in the samples collected. At the concentration levels investigated, 90% of the analytes were quantifiable by TFME, whereas only 53% of the compounds were reportable using the LLE method particularly at concentrations lower than 1 µg L-1. The comparison of TFME and LLE from several analytical aspects demonstrated that the novel TFME method gave similar accuracy to LLE, while providing additional advantages including higher sensitivity, lower sample volume, thus reduced waste production, and faster analytical throughput. Given the sensitivity, simplicity, low cost, accuracy, greenness and relatively fast procedure of TFME, it shows great potential for adoption in analytical laboratories as an alternative to LLE.

Comparative study on adsorption of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) by different adsorbents in water.

Perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) are emerging environmental pollutants. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) are the two primary PFC contaminants that are widely found in water, particularly in groundwater. This study compared the adsorption behaviors of PFOS and PFOA on several commercially available adsorbents in water. The tested adsorbents include granular activated carbon (GAC: Filtrasorb 400), powdered activated carbon, multi-walled carbon nanotube (MCN), double-walled carbon nanotube, anion-exchange resin (AER: IRA67), non-ion-exchange polymer, alumina, and silica. The study demonstrated that adsorption is an effective technique for the removal of PFOS/PFOA from aqueous solutions. The kinetic tests showed that the adsorption onto AER reaches equilibrium rapidly (2 h), while it takes approximately 4 and 24 h to reach equilibrium for MCN and GAC, respectively. In terms of adsorption capacity, AER and GAC were identified as the most effective adsorbents to remove PFOS/PFOA from water. Furthermore, MCN, AER, and GAC proved to have high PFOS/PFOA removal efficiencies (≥98%). AER (IRA67) and GAC (Filtrasorb 400) were thus identified as the most promising adsorbents for treating PFOS/PFOA-contaminated groundwater at mg L(-1) level based on their equilibrium times, adsorption capacities, removal efficiencies, and associated costs.