The frequency of cytochrome 4F2 rs2108622 genetic variant and its effects on the lipid profile and complications of type II diabetes among a sample of patients in Jordan: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Cytochrome 4F2 (CYP4F2) is a major arachidonic acid-metabolizing enzyme which produces 20-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (20-HETE). It is found that 20-HETE is involved in the pathophysiology of many diseases, including diabetes mellitus. The genetic variants of CYP4F2 can affect its enzymatic activity as well as the 20-HETE production. AIMS: Our aim with this paper was to find out the genotype frequency of CYP4F2 rs2108622 C>T, the major functional variant in the CYP4F2 gene, among a sample of type II diabetes (TIIDM) and its effects on diabetes complications and lipid profile. METHODS: The CYP4F2 rs2108622 variant was genotyped among 90 healthy volunteers and 90 TIIDM patients that attending the University of Jordan Hospital, using the DNA Sanger sequencing method. The data of lipid profile and diabetes complications were obtained from the electronic records available in the hospital. RESULTS: We found that the frequency of CYP4F2 rs2108622C>T variant is significantly (P = 0.02) lower among TIIDM patients in comparison to healthy subjects using both co-dominant and dominant genotyping models. In addition, the CYP4F2 rs2108622 T/T genotype was significantly (P = 0.02) more frequent among TIIDM patients with retinopathy complications (OR=4.36, CI: 1.32-14.37). Lastly, the CYP4F2 rs2108622C>T variant was not associated (P > 0.05) with the glycaemic and lipid profile of patients. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded from this study that the frequency of CYP4F2 rs2108622 T/T genotype is lower among TIIDM, but this genotype is associated with an increased risk of retinopathy complications in patients of Jordanian origin. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed to validate the findings of this study.

Clinical Ethics from the Islamic Perspective : A qualitative study exploring the views of Jordanian doctors.

Like other Arab countries, Jordan must find ways of responding to the rapid processes of change affecting many aspects of social life. This is particularly urgent in healthcare, where social and technical change is often manifested in tensions about ethical decision-making in the clinic. To explore the attitudes, beliefs and concerns relating to ethical decision-making among health professionals in Jordanian hospitals, a qualitative study was conducted involving face-to-face interviews with medical personnel in four hospitals in Amman, the capital of Jordan. Data were analysed thematically in relation to a pre-existing set of ethical categories. Interviews were conducted with thirty-eight doctors covering most medical specialities. Five major themes emerged from the interviews: ethical awareness, ethical issues, the impact of religion on ethical decision-making, practical and theoretical resources for ethical decision-making, and challenges. While uncertainty was expressed about some aspects of Western approaches to ethics, participants strongly supported adoption of a range of Western bioethical principles, including cultural and ethical diversity, along with adherence to Islamic religious norms. A range of serious ethical challenges facing the Jordanian health system were identified, covering social, legal, managerial, and technical issues. Ethical decision-making in Jordan is complex, having to accommodate the needs of patients, the opinions of doctors and their families, the views of religious authorities, managerial considerations, and both local norms and international standards. Health professionals struggle with three sets of tensions that emerge out of the struggle between traditional, community-embedded forms of social organization and the demands generated by globalization and the influence of Western culture: the tensions between tradition and modernity, conservatism and pragmatism, and religion and secularism. Doctors in Jordan prefer approaches to ethical decision-making that realize a balance between the extremes, although the exact nature of where that balance should lie remains uncertain.

The struggle for clinical ethics in Jordanian Hospitals.

The Arab and Islamic world is in cultural, political and ethical flux. Pressures of globalisation contend with ancient ideas and concepts that permeate cultural frameworks. Health professionals are among the many groups battling to accommodate the rapidly changing conditions. In many predominantly Muslim countries intense debates are underway among clinicians about the impact of the forces of change on their practices. To help understand these forces we conducted a study of the experiences of clinicians in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, a Middle Eastern nation state where the overwhelming majority of the population is Muslim. The sample contained 508 doctors and doctors-in-training, of whom 63% were male and 80% were younger than 40 years of age. It included both a quantitative survey, covering a wide range of issues, and qualitative, free-text written responses. Our results demonstrated high levels of disquiet related to the overall organisation and administration of the health care system, the specific content of ethical decisionmaking, and the impact of changing social, cultural and religious factors. Concerns included overcrowding, widespread corruption and hierarchical, non- democratic, management practices, and tensions relating to traditional and modern approaches to ethics, especially in relation to consent, organ donation, confidentiality, privacy, abortion, and the role of women. The roles of religion and religious authorities, the relative importance of the family, and community and tribal obligations were also areas of contention. The study exposes profound divisions and widely differing perspectives among Jordanian doctors and an abiding sense of uncertainty and instability within the profession. Many doctors express ambivalence in relation to both modern trends and traditional precepts. Three main axes of ethical contention were demonstrated, relating to the tensions between: "conservative" and "pragmatic" styles of decision-making; "traditional" approaches and internationalised standards of ethics; and the role of Islam and pressures to disengage ethical decision- making from religious authority. We speculate that these issues and divisions, and the deep sense of disquiet revealed by our data reflect large-scale forces to which Jordanian society is exposed and to a substantial degree may provide a way to understand the ethical predicament of many other countries in the contemporary Arab world.