ABSTRACT
The diagnosis of celiac disease relies on the assessment of serological data and the presence of histological alterations in the duodenal mucosa. The duodenal biopsy is pivotal in adults, and in some circumstances in children, to confirm the clinical suspicion of celiac disease. The correct interpretation of duodenal biopsies is influenced by numerous variables. The aim of this overview is to describe the correct methodological approach including the procedures of biopsy sampling, orientation, processing, staining and histopathological classification in order to avoid or minimize the errors and the variability in duodenal biopsy interpretation. Multiple biopsies taken from different sites of the duodenum during endoscopy maximize the diagnostic yield of duodenal histological sampling. Proper orientation of the biopsy samples is of the utmost importance to assess histological features of pathological duodenal mucosa and to avoid artifacts that may lead even an experienced pathologist to a wrong histological interpretation with subsequent misdiagnosis of celiac disease. An immunohistochemical stain for CD3 can be invaluable to aid the pathologist in obtaining a more accurate intra-epithelial T lymphocytes count. A simplified histological classification facilitates the clinician's work and improves the communication between pathologist and clinician. An integrated clinical and pathological approach is required for a correct diagnosis of celiac disease since a relatively large number of conditions may cause duodenal damage with a histological appearance similar to that of celiac disease.
ABSTRACT
Background: Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) represent a heterogeneous set of different histological lesions, characterized by the capacity to transform in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Despite optimal surgical treatment, approximately 20%-30% of OPMDs may evolve into OSCC. No clear clinical/histological factors are able to identify OPMDs at higher risk of malignant transformation. Materials and Methods: We considered surgically treated patients with a diagnosis of OPMDs, enrolled from 1996 to 2019 at ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia without a diagnosis of OSCC within the previous 2 years. Clinical and histological characteristics were recorded. Outcomes of interest were recurrence-free survival (RFS), defined as the time from surgery for primary OPMD to any relapse of OPMD or malignant transformation, whichever occurred first, and carcinoma-free survival (CFS), defined as the time from surgery for OPMD to malignant transformation. Results: We retrospectively reviewed 106 OPMDs cases. Median age at first diagnosis was 64 years old (IQR = 18.75); female patients comprise 51.9% of the cases. During a median follow-up of 30.5 months (IQR = 44), in 23.5% of patients, malignant transformation occurred. RFS at 1, 5, and 10 years was 92.4%, 60.9%, and 43.2%, respectively. Female sex and history of previous OSCC were independent risk factors for RFS. CFS at 1, 5, and 10 years of follow-up was 97.1%, 75.9%, and 64.4%, respectively. Previous OSCC was an independent risk factor for CFS. Conclusions: In this large series of OPMDs, only previous diagnosis of OSCC was a prognostic factor for further OSCC occurrence. Given the lack of additional clinical/pathological prognostic factors, we advocate further studies into molecular characterization of OPMDs to better stratify the risk of malignant transformation.
