Histone demethylase JARID1C/KDM5C regulates Th17 cells by increasing IL-6 expression in diabetic plasmacytoid dendritic cells.

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are first responders to tissue injury, where they prime naive T cells. The role of pDCs in physiologic wound repair has been examined, but little is known about pDCs in diabetic wound tissue and their interactions with naive CD4+ T cells. Diabetic wounds are characterized by increased levels of inflammatory IL-17A cytokine, partly due to increased Th17 CD4+ cells. This increased IL-17A cytokine, in excess, impairs tissue repair. Here, using human tissue and murine wound healing models, we found that diabetic wound pDCs produced excess IL-6 and TGF-ß and that these cytokines skewed naive CD4+ T cells toward a Th17 inflammatory phenotype following cutaneous injury. Further, we identified that increased IL-6 cytokine production by diabetic wound pDCs is regulated by a histone demethylase, Jumonji AT-rich interactive domain 1C histone demethylase (JARID1C). Decreased JARID1C increased IL-6 transcription in diabetic pDCs, and this process was regulated upstream by an IFN-I/TYK2/JAK1,3 signaling pathway. When inhibited in nondiabetic wound pDCs, JARID1C skewed naive CD4+ T cells toward a Th17 phenotype and increased IL-17A production. Together, this suggests that diabetic wound pDCs are epigenetically altered to increase IL-6 expression that then affects T cell phenotype. These findings identify a therapeutically manipulable pathway in diabetic wounds.

Rodent Inferior Vena Cava Venoplasty Balloon Model.

Balloon venoplasty is a commonly used clinical technique to treat deep vein stenosis and occlusion as a consequence of trauma, congenital anatomic abnormalities, acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or stenting. Chronic deep venous obstruction is histopathologically characterized by thrombosis, fibrosis, or both. Currently, no direct treatment is available to target these pathological processes. Therefore, a reliable in vivo animal model to test novel interventions is necessary. The rodent survival inferior vena cava (IVC) venoplasty balloon model (VBM) allows the study of balloon venoplasty in non-thrombotic and post-thrombotic conditions across multiple time points. The local and systemic effect of coated and uncoated venoplasty balloons can be quantified via tissue, thrombus, and blood assays such as real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), western blot, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), zymography, vein wall and thrombus cellular analysis, whole blood and plasma assays, and histological analysis. The VBM is reproducible, replicates surgical human interventions, can identify local vein wall-thrombi protein changes, and allows multiple analyses from the same sample, decreasing the number of animals required per group.

Submitting a successful National Institutes of Health career development award for the vascular surgeon scientist.

Obtaining a career development award from the National Institutes of Health (K award) is often an important step in establishing a career as a vascular surgeon scientist. The application and review process is competitive, involves many steps, and may be confusing to the prospective applicant. Further, there are requirements involving mentors and the applicant's institution. This article, authored completely by vascular surgeons with active K awards, is intended for potential applicants and personnel at their institution and reviews relevant information including strategies for a successful application.

IL-4-STAT6 axis amplifies histamine-induced vascular endothelial dysfunction and hypovolemic shock.

BACKGROUND: Mast cell-derived mediators induce vasodilatation and fluid extravasation, leading to cardiovascular failure in severe anaphylaxis. We previously revealed a synergistic interaction between the cytokine IL-4 and the mast cell-derived mediator histamine in modulating vascular endothelial (VE) dysfunction and severe anaphylaxis. The mechanism by which IL-4 exacerbates histamine-induced VE dysfunction and severe anaphylaxis is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the IL-4-induced molecular processes regulating the amplification of histamine-induced VE barrier dysfunction and the severity of IgE-mediated anaphylactic reactions. METHODS: RNA sequencing, Western blot, Ca2+ imaging, and barrier functional analyses were performed on the VE cell line (EA.hy926). Pharmacologic degraders (selective proteolysis-targeting chimera) and genetic (lentiviral short hairpin RNA) inhibitors were used to determine the roles of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and STAT6 in conjunction with in vivo model systems of histamine-induced hypovolemic shock. RESULTS: IL-4 enhancement of histamine-induced VE barrier dysfunction was associated with increased VE-cadherin degradation, intracellular calcium flux, and phosphorylated Src levels and required transcription and de novo protein synthesis. RNA sequencing analyses of IL-4-stimulated VE cells identified dysregulation of genes involved in cell proliferation, cell development, and cell growth, and transcription factor motif analyses revealed a significant enrichment of differential expressed genes with putative STAT3 and STAT6 motif. IL-4 stimulation in EA.hy926 cells induced both serine residue 727 and tyrosine residue 705 phosphorylation of STAT3. Genetic and pharmacologic ablation of VE STAT3 activity revealed a role for STAT3 in basal VE barrier function; however, IL-4 enhancement and histamine-induced VE barrier dysfunction was predominantly STAT3 independent. In contrast, IL-4 enhancement and histamine-induced VE barrier dysfunction was STAT6 dependent. Consistent with this finding, pharmacologic knockdown of STAT6 abrogated IL-4-mediated amplification of histamine-induced hypovolemia. CONCLUSIONS: These studies unveil a novel role of the IL-4/STAT6 signaling axis in the priming of VE cells predisposing to exacerbation of histamine-induced anaphylaxis.

Comparative evaluation of transcutaneous oxygen tension and ankle-brachial index as predictors of reoperation following below-knee amputation.

OBJECTIVE: Decision-making regarding level of lower extremity amputation is sometimes challenging. Selecting an appropriate anatomic level for major amputation requires consideration of tradeoffs between postoperative function and risk of wound complications that may require additional operations, including debridement and/or conversion to above-knee amputation (AKA). We evaluated the utility of common, non-invasive diagnostic tests used in clinical practice to predict the need for reoperations among patients undergoing primary, elective, below knee-amputations (BKAs) by vascular surgeons. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective BKA over a 5-year period were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Medical records were reviewed to characterize demographics, pre-amputation testing transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2), and ankle-brachial index (ABI). The need for ipsilateral post-BKA reoperation (including BKA revision and/or conversion to AKA) regardless of indication was the primary outcome. Associations were evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Cutpoints for TcPO2 values associated with amputation reoperation were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: We identified 175 BKAs, of which 46 (26.3%) required ipsilateral reoperation (18.9% BKA revisions and 14.3% conversions to AKA). The mean age was 63.3 ± 14.8 years. Most patients were male (65.1%) and White (72.0%). Mean pre-amputation calf TcPO2 was 40.0 ± 20.5 mmHg, and mean ABI was 0.64 ± 0.45. In univariable models, post-BKA reoperation was associated with calf TcPO2 (odds ratio [OR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.99; P = .013) but not ABI (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.19-1.46; P = .217). Univariable associations with reoperation were also identified for age (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.990; P = .003) and diabetes (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.21-0.87; P = .019). No associations with amputation revision were identified for gender, race, end-stage renal disease, or preoperative antibiotics. Calf TcPO2 remained associated with post-BKA reoperation in a multivariable model (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99; P = .022) adjusted for age (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94-1.01; P = .222) and diabetes (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94-1.01; P = .559). Receiver operating characteristic analysis suggested a TcPO2 ≥38 mmHg as an appropriate cut-point for assessing risk for BKA revision (area under the curve = 0.682; negative predictive value, 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Reoperation after BKA is common, and reoperation risk was associated with pre-amputation TcPO2. For patients undergoing elective BKA, higher risk of reoperation should be discussed with patients with an ipsilateral TcPO2 <38 mmHg.

Factors associated with lack of clinical improvement after vein ablation in the vascular quality initiative.

BACKGROUND: Insurance companies have adopted variable and inconsistent approval criteria for chronic venous disease (CVD) treatment. Although vein ablation (VA) is accepted as the standard of care for venous ulcers, the treatment criteria for patients with milder forms of CVD remain controversial. This study aims to identify factors associated with a lack of clinical improvement (LCI) in patients with less severe CVD without ulceration undergoing VA to improve patient selection for treatment. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing VA for CEAP C2 to C4 disease in the Vascular Quality Initiative varicose veins database from 2014 to 2023. Patients who required intervention in multiple veins, had undergone prior interventions, or presented with CEAP C5 to C6 disease were excluded. The difference (Δ) in venous clinical severity score (VCSS; VCSS before minus after the procedure) was used to categorize the patients. Patients with a ΔVCSS of ≤0 were defined as having LCI after VA, and patients with ≥1 point decrease in the VCSS after VA (ΔVCSS ≥1) as having some benefit from the procedure and, therefore, "clinical improvement." The characteristics of both groups were compared, and multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with LCI. A second analysis was performed based on the VVSymQ instrument, which measures patient-reported outcomes using five specific symptoms (ie, heaviness, achiness, swelling, throbbing pain, and itching). Patients with LCI showed no improvement in any of the five symptoms, and those with clinical improvement had a decrease in severity of at least one symptom. RESULTS: A total of 3544 patients underwent initial treatment of CVD with a single VA. Of the 3544 patients, 2607 had VCSSs available before and after VA, and 420 (16.1%) had LCI based on the ΔVCSS. Patients with LCI were more likely to be significantly older and African American and have CEAP C2 disease compared with patients with clinical improvement. Patients with clinical improvement were more likely to have reported using compression stockings before treatment. The vein diameters were not different between the two groups. The incidence of complications was overall low, with minor differences between the two groups. However, the patients with LCI were significantly more likely to have symptoms after intervention than those with improvement. Patients with LCI were more likely to have technical failure, defined as vein recanalization. On multivariable regression, age (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.02) and obesity (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.09-2.00) were independently associated with LCI, as was treatment of less severe disease (CEAP C2; OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.30-2.56) compared with more advanced disease (C4). The lack of compression therapy before intervention was also associated with LCI (OR, 6.05; 95% CI, 4.30-8.56). The analysis based on the VVSymQ showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: LCI after VA is associated with treating patients with a lower CEAP class (C2 vs C4) and a lack of compression therapy before intervention. Importantly, no significant association between vein size and clinical improvement was observed.

A comparative study of altered hemodynamics in iliac vein compression syndrome.

Introduction: Iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) is present in over 20% of the population and is associated with left leg pain, swelling, and thrombosis. IVCS symptoms are thought to be induced by altered pelvic hemodynamics, however, there currently exists a knowledge gap on the hemodynamic differences between IVCS and healthy patients. To elucidate those differences, we carried out a patient-specific, computational modeling comparative study. Methods: Computed tomography and ultrasound velocity and area data were used to build and validate computational models for a cohort of IVCS (N = 4, Subject group) and control (N = 4, Control group) patients. Flow, cross-sectional area, and shear rate were compared between the right common iliac vein (RCIV) and left common iliac vein (LCIV) for each group and between the Subject and Control groups for the same vessel. Results: For the IVCS patients, LCIV mean shear rate was higher than RCIV mean shear rate (550 ± 103 s-1 vs. 113 ± 48 s-1, p = 0.0009). Furthermore, LCIV mean shear rate was higher in the Subject group than in the Control group (550 ± 103 s-1 vs. 75 ± 37 s-1, p = 0.0001). Lastly, the LCIV/RCIV shear rate ratio was 4.6 times greater in the Subject group than in the Control group (6.56 ± 0.9 vs. 1.43 ± 0.6, p = 0.00008). Discussion: Our analyses revealed that IVCS patients have elevated shear rates which may explain a higher thrombosis risk and suggest that their thrombus initiation process may share aspects of arterial thrombosis. We have identified hemodynamic metrics that revealed profound differences between IVCS patients and Controls, and between RCIV and LCIV in the IVCS patients. Based on these metrics, we propose that non-invasive measurement of shear rate may aid with stratification of patients with moderate compression in which treatment is highly variable. More investigation is needed to assess the prognostic value of shear rate and shear rate ratio as clinical metrics and to understand the mechanisms of thrombus formation in IVCS patients.

The 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part II: Endorsed by the Society of Interventional Radiology and the Society for Vascular Medicine.

The Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Venous Forum, and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society recently published Part I of the 2022 clinical practice guidelines on varicose veins. Recommendations were based on the latest scientific evidence researched following an independent systematic review and meta-analysis of five critical issues affecting the management of patients with lower extremity varicose veins, using the patients, interventions, comparators, and outcome system to answer critical questions. Part I discussed the role of duplex ultrasound scanning in the evaluation of varicose veins and treatment of superficial truncal reflux. Part II focuses on evidence supporting the prevention and management of varicose vein patients with compression, on treatment with drugs and nutritional supplements, on evaluation and treatment of varicose tributaries, on superficial venous aneurysms, and on the management of complications of varicose veins and their treatment. All guidelines were based on systematic reviews, and they were graded according to the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations, using the GRADE method. All ungraded Consensus Statements were supported by an extensive literature review and the unanimous agreement of an expert, multidisciplinary panel. Ungraded Good Practice Statements are recommendations that are supported only by indirect evidence. The topic, however, is usually noncontroversial and agreed upon by most stakeholders. The Implementation Remarks contain technical information that supports the implementation of specific recommendations. This comprehensive document includes a list of all recommendations (Parts I-II), ungraded consensus statements, implementation remarks, and best practice statements to aid practitioners with appropriate, up-to-date management of patients with lower extremity varicose veins.

A comparison of below-knee vs above-knee endovenous ablation of varicose veins.

OBJECTIVE: Varicose veins have a significant impact on quality of life and can commonly occur in the thigh and calves. However, there has been no large-scale investigation examining the relationship between anatomic distribution and outcomes after varicose vein treatment. This study sought to compare below-the-knee (BTK) and above-the-knee (ATK) varicose vein treatment outcomes. METHODS: Employing the Vascular Quality Initiative Varicose Vein Registry, 13,731 patients undergoing varicose vein ablation for either BTK or ATK lesions were identified. Outcomes were assessed using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). Continuous variables were compared using the t-test, and categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of improvement after intervention. The multivariable model controlled for age, gender, race, preoperative VCSS composite score, and history of deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: Patients who received below-knee treatment had a lower preoperative VCSS composite (7.0 ± 3.3 vs 7.7 ± 3.3; P < .001) and lower PROs composite scores (11.1 ± 6.4 vs 13.0 ± 6.6; P < .001) compared with those of patients receiving above-knee treatment. However, on follow-up, patients receiving below-knee intervention had a higher postoperative VCSS composite score (4.4 ± 3.3 vs 3.9 ± 3.5; P < .001) and PROs composite score (6.1 ± 4.4 vs 5.8 ± 4.5; P = .007), the latter approaching statistical significance. Patients receiving above-knee interventions also demonstrated more improvement in both composite VCSS (3.8 ± 4.0 vs 2.9 ± 3.7; P < .001) and PROs (7.1 ± 6.8 vs 4.8 ± 6.6; P < .001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis similarly revealed that patients receiving above-knee treatment had significantly higher odds of improvement in VCSS composite in both the unadjusted (odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-1.65; P < .001 and adjusted (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.14-1.50; P < .001) models. Patients receiving above-knee treatment also had a significantly higher odds of reporting improvement in PROs composite in both the unadjusted (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.64-2.11; P < .001) and adjusted (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.45-1.88; P < .001) models. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment region has a significant association with PROs and VCSS composite scores after varicose vein interventions. Preoperatively, there were significant differences in the composite scores of VCSS and PROs with patients receiving BTK treatment exhibiting less severe symptoms. Yet, the association appeared to reverse postoperatively, with those receiving BTK treatments exhibiting worse PROs, worse VCSS composites scores, and less improvement in VCSS composite scores. Therefore, BTK interventions pose a unique challenge compared with ATK interventions in ensuring commensurate clinical improvement after treatment.

Effect of junctional reflux on the venous clinical severity score in patients with insufficiency of the great saphenous vein (JURY study).

OBJECTIVE: Effective treatment options are available for chronic venous insufficiency associated with superficial venous reflux. Although many patients with C2 and C3 disease based on the CEAP (Clinical-Etiological-Anatomical-Pathophysiological) classification have combined great saphenous vein (GSV) and saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) reflux, some may not have concomitant SFJ reflux. Several payors have determined that symptom severity in patients without SFJ reflux does not warrant treatment. In patients planned for venous ablation, we tested whether Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSS) are equivalent in those with GSV reflux alone compared with those with both GSV and SFJ reflux. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at 10 centers. Inclusion criteria were: candidate for endovenous ablation as determined by treating physician; 18 to 80 years of age; GSV reflux with or without SFJ reflux on ultrasound; and C2 or C3 disease. Exclusion criteria were prior deep vein thrombosis; prior vein ablation on the index limb; ilio-caval obstruction; and renal, hepatic, or heart failure requiring prior hospitalization. An a priori sample size was calculated. We used multiple linear regression (adjusted for patient characteristics) to compare differences in VCSS scores of the two groups at baseline, and to test whether scores were equivalent using a priori equivalence boundaries of +1 and -1. In secondary analyses, we tested differences in VCSS scores in patients with C2 and C3 disease separately. RESULTS: A total of 352 patients were enrolled; 64.2% (n = 226) had SFJ reflux, and 35.8% (n = 126) did not. The two groups did not differ by major clinical characteristics. The mean age of the cohort was 53.9 ± 14.3 years; women comprised 74.2%; White patients 85.8%; and body mass index was 27.8 ± 6.1 kg/m2. The VCSS scores in patients with and without SFJ reflux were found to be equivalent; SFJ reflux was not a significant predictor of VCSS score; and mean VCSS scores did not differ significantly (6.4 vs 6.6, respectively, P = .40). In secondary subset analyses, VCSS scores were equivalent between C2 patients with and without SFJ reflux, and VCSS scores of C3 patients with SFJ reflux were lower than those without SFJ reflux. CONCLUSIONS: Symptom severity is equivalent in patients with GSV reflux with or without SFJ reflux. The absence of SFJ reflux alone should not determine the treatment paradigm in patients with symptomatic chronic venous insufficiency. Patients with GSV reflux who meet clinical criteria for treatment should have equivalent treatment regardless of whether or not they have SFJ reflux.

Variations and inconsistencies in venous ablation coverage policies between single-state and multistate carriers in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Vein ablation is a common and effective treatment for patients with chronic venous insufficiency. The overuse of vein ablation despite the existence of evidence-based guidelines has resulted in insurance companies developing restrictive policies for coverage that create barriers to appropriate care. This study compares the insurance coverage by single-state carriers (SSCs) and multistate carriers (MSCs), highlighting the variations and inconsistencies in the various policies. METHODS: The American Venous Forum Venous Policy Navigator was reviewed for the various policies available in the United States. The policies were divided into SSCs and MSCs. The characteristics of the policies, including the anatomic and hemodynamic criteria for specific veins, duration of conservative treatment, disease severity, symptoms, and types of procedures covered, were compared between the two groups. SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 122 policies were analyzed and divided between SSCs (n = 85; 69.7%) and MSCs (n = 37; 30.3%). A significant variation was found in the size requirement for great saphenous vein ablation. Although 48% of the policies did not specify a size criterion, the remaining policies indicated a minimal size, ranging from 3 to 5.5 mm. However, no significant differences were found between SSCs and MSCs. Similar findings were encountered for the small and anterior accessory saphenous veins. MSCs were more likely to define a saphenous reflux time >500 ms compared with SSCs (81.1% vs 58.8%; P = .04). A significant difference was found between the SSCs and MSCs in the criteria for perforator ablation in terms of size and reflux time. MSCs were significantly more likely to provide coverage for mechanochemical ablation than were SSCs (24.3% vs 8.2%; P = .03). SSCs were more likely to require ≥12 weeks of compression stocking therapy than were MSCs (76.5% vs 48.7%; P = .01). No significant differences were found in the clinical indications between the two groups; however, MSCs were more likely to mention major hemorrhage than were SSCs. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study highlight the variations in policies for venous ablation, in particular, the striking inconsistencies in size criteria. MSCs were more likely to cover mechanochemical ablation and require a shorter duration of conservative therapy before intervention compared with SSCs. Evidence-based guidance is needed to develop more coherent policies for venous ablation coverage.

A mapping review of Pacific Vascular Symposium 6 initiatives.

OBJECTIVE: The 2010 Pacific Vascular Symposium 6 (PVS6) brought venous disease content experts together with a goal of addressing critical issues collated together in the next decade with concrete plans to achieve these goals. This mapping review aims to provide a broader representation of how progress in critical issues of chronic venous disease has been made by extrapolating scientific publications related to the PVS6 initiatives. METHODS: We performed a mapping review identifying original or systematic review/meta-analysis articles related to PVS 6 initiatives (aims) that addressed one of the following key objectives: scales to measure chronic venous disease, effectiveness of interventional deep venous thrombus removal, development of a deep venous valve, and biomarkers related to venous disease. Searches were undertaken in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Scopus. We extracted descriptive information about the studies and predefined variables for each specific aim, showing what and where research exists on the aims included. RESULTS: A total of 2138 articles were screened from 3379 retrieved articles from six electronic databases. We mapped 186 included articles, finding that the total number of publications significantly increased after the 2010 PVS6 meeting. Aim results were visually summarized. The largest body of data addressed catheter-based thrombus removal strategies for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. Primary research on artificial venous valves and venous biomarkers remained limited. No new post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) score has been developed. CONCLUSIONS: This mapping review identified and characterized the available evidence and gaps in our knowledge of chronic venous disease that exist visually, which may guide where more significant investments for the future should be targeted.

The oxylipin analog CS585 prevents platelet activation and thrombosis through activation of the prostacyclin receptor.

Cardiovascular disease remains the primary cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Platelet activation is critical for maintaining hemostasis and preventing the leakage of blood cells from the vessel. There has been a paucity in the development of new drugs to target platelet reactivity. Recently, the oxylipin 12(S)-hydroxy-eicosatrienoic acid (12-HETrE), which is produced in platelets, was shown to limit platelet reactivity by activating the prostacyclin receptor. Here, we demonstrated the synthesis of a novel analog of 12-HETrE, known as CS585. Human blood and mouse models of hemostasis and thrombosis were assessed for the ability of CS585 to attenuate platelet activation and thrombosis without increasing the risk of bleeding. Human platelet activation was assessed using aggregometry, flow cytometry, western blot analysis, total thrombus formation analysis system, microfluidic perfusion chamber, and thromboelastography. Hemostasis, thrombosis, and bleeding assays were performed in mice. CS585 was shown to potently target the prostacyclin receptor on the human platelet, resulting in a highly selective and effective mechanism for the prevention of platelet activation. Furthermore, CS585 was shown to inhibit platelet function in human whole blood ex vivo, prevent thrombosis in both small and large vessels in mouse models, and exhibit long-lasting prevention of clot formation. Finally, CS585 was not observed to perturb coagulation or increase the risk of bleeding in the mouse model. Hence, CS585 represents a new validated target for the treatment of thrombotic diseases without the risk of bleeding or off-target activation observed with other prostaglandin receptor agonists.

Saphenous vein aneurysms characterization and treatment: A 36-year single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Superficial vein aneurysms (SVA) are rare vascular pathologies associated with trauma, chronic venous disease, and venous malformation. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed cases of SVA treated from 1986 to 2022. RESULTS: Out of 2463 venous procedures, 16 patients were found with 19 GSV and 1 SSV aneurysms, with 88% presenting with a palpable mass. Varicose veins were noted in 94% of patients, 81% had concomitant reflux, 15% had thrombus within the aneurysm sac, and 19% demonstrated multiple aneurysms. All patients underwent ligation and excision. Post-procedure, 55% of patients received anticoagulants, and 85% received compression. Mean follow-up was 19.4 months, with no aneurysm recurrence. We propose a modification to the current SVA classification. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of multiple aneurysms suggests the need for complete limb imaging in affected patients. Surgical management of SVA was effective in preventing SVA recurrence, while the proposed classification modification will aid in future SVA management.

An ultrasound imaging and computational fluid dynamics protocol to assess hemodynamics in iliac vein compression syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Elevated shear rates are known to play a role in arterial thrombosis; however, shear rates have not been thoroughly investigated in patients with iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) owing to imaging limitations and assumptions on the low shear nature of venous flows. This study was undertaken to develop a standardized protocol that quantifies IVCS shear rates and can aid in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with moderate yet symptomatic compression. METHODS: Study patients with and without IVCS had their iliac vein hemodynamics measured via duplex ultrasound (US) at two of the following three vessel locations: infrarenal inferior vena cava (IVC), right common iliac vein, and left common iliac vein, in addition to acquiring data at the right and left external iliac veins. US velocity spectra were multiplied by a weighted cross-sectional area calculated from US and computed tomography (CT) data to create flow waveforms. Flow waveforms were then scaled to enforce conservation of flow across the IVC and common iliac veins. A three-dimensional (3D), patient-specific model of the iliac vein anatomy was constructed from CT and US examination. Flow waveforms and the 3D model were used as a basis to run a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. Owing to collateral vessel flow and discrepancies between CT and US area measurements, flows in internal iliac veins and cross-sectional areas of the common iliac veins were calibrated iteratively against target common iliac flow. Simulation results on mean velocity were validated against US data at measurement locations. Simulation results were postprocessed to derive spatial and temporal values of quantities such as velocity and shear rate. RESULTS: Using our modeling protocol, we were able to build CFD models of the iliac veins that matched common iliac flow splits within 2% and measured US velocities within 10%. Proof-of-concept analyses (1 subject, 1 control) have revealed that patients with IVCS may experience elevated shear rates in the compressed left common iliac vein, more typical of the arterial rather than the venous circulation. These results encourage us to extend this protocol to a larger group of patients with IVCS and controls. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a protocol that obtains hemodynamic measurements of the IVC and iliac veins from US, creates patient-specific 3D reconstructions of the venous anatomy using CT and US examinations, and computes shear rates using calibrated CFD methods. Proof-of-concept results have indicated that patients with IVCS may experience elevated shear rates in the compressed left common iliac vein. Larger cohorts are needed to assess the relationship between venous compression and shear rates in patients with IVCS as compared with controls with noncompressed iliac veins. Further studies using this protocol may also give promising insights into whether or not to treat patients with moderate, yet symptomatic compression.

Thromboembolic outcomes are decreased with the use of a standardized venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis protocol for patients undergoing superficial venous procedures.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with venous insufficiency can be treated with ablation or phlebectomy, or both. Patients undergoing superficial venous procedures have an elevated risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). At our institution, we initiated a standardized protocol in which patients with a Caprini score (2005 version) of ≥8 are treated with 1 week of prophylactic anticoagulation after the procedure. Duplex ultrasound was performed at 1 week and then within 90 days after the procedure. This aim of the present study was to determine the thrombotic and clinical outcomes after superficial vein procedures using a standardized protocol for DVT/PE risk assessment and prophylaxis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of superficial vein procedures from 2015 to 2021 at a single center. The patient demographics, CEAP (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology) clinical class, venous clinical severity score, patient-reported outcomes, treatment type, Caprini scores, pre- and postoperative anticoagulation use, and outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics were used for the patient demographics, procedure details, and unadjusted surgical outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between procedure type and DVT and PE after adjusting for patient characteristics, disease severity, periprocedural anticoagulation, and Caprini score. RESULTS: A total of 1738 limbs were treated with ablation (n = 820), phlebectomy (n = 181), or ablation and phlebectomy (n = 737). More patients were women (67.1%) and White (90.9%). The overall incidence of DVT/PE was 1.4%. Patients undergoing ablation with phlebectomy had higher rates of DVT/PE (2.7%) than those undergoing ablation (0.2%) or phlebectomy alone (1.7%; P < .01). However, only 30% of DVTs were above the knee. On multivariate analysis, only the procedure type predicted for DVT/PE. However, patients undergoing ablation and phlebectomy achieved better patient-reported outcomes (Caprini score, 5.9) compared with those undergoing ablation (Caprini score, 7.2) or phlebectomy (Caprini score, 7.9) alone (P < .01). The best improvement in the venous clinical severity score was seen with phlebectomy alone. CONCLUSIONS: The expected difference in the DVT/PE rates between high- and low-risk groups did not materialize in our patients, perhaps secondary to the additional chemoprophylaxis prescribed for the high-risk cohort (Caprini score, ≥8). These results call for a randomized trial to assess the efficacy of a standardized protocol in the reduction of DVT/PE after superficial vein procedures.

Characterizing geographic variation in postoperative venous thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) after major surgery remains an important contributor to morbidity and mortality. Despite significant quality improvement efforts in prevention and prophylaxis strategies, the degree of hospital and regional variation in the United States remains unknown. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries undergoing 13 different major surgeries at U.S. hospitals between 2016 and 2018 were included in this retrospective cohort study. We calculated the rates of 90-day VTE. We adjusted for a variety of patient and hospital covariates and used a multilevel logistic regression model to calculate the rates of VTE and coefficients of variation across hospitals and hospital referral regions (HRRs). RESULTS: A total of 4,115,837 patients from 4116 hospitals were included, of whom 116,450 (2.8%) experienced VTE within 90 days. The 90-day VTE rates varied substantially by procedure, from 2.5% for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair to 8.4% for pancreatectomy. Across the hospitals, there was a 6.6-fold variation in index hospitalization VTE and a 5.3-fold variation in the rate of postdischarge VTE. Across the HRRs, there was a 2.6-fold variation in 90-day VTE, with a 12.1-fold variation in the coefficient of variation. A subset of HRRs was identified with both higher VTE rates and higher variance across hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variation exists in the rate of postoperative VTE across U.S. hospitals. Characterizing HRRs with high overall rates of VTE and those with significant variation across the hospitals will allow for targeted quality improvement efforts.

Experimental venous thrombus resolution is driven by IL-6 mediated monocyte actions.

Deep venous thrombosis and residual thrombus burden correlates with circulating IL-6 levels in humans. To investigate the cellular source and role of IL-6 in thrombus resolution, Wild type C57BL/6J (WT), and IL-6-/- mice underwent induction of VT via inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis or stasis. Vein wall (VW) and thrombus were analyzed by western blot, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry. Adoptive transfer of WT bone marrow derived monocytes was performed into IL6-/- mice to assess for rescue. Cultured BMDMs from WT and IL-6-/- mice underwent quantitative real time PCR and immunoblotting for fibrinolytic factors and matrix metalloproteinase activity. No differences in baseline coagulation function or platelet function were found between WT and IL-6-/- mice. VW and thrombus IL-6 and IL-6 leukocyte-specific receptor CD126 were elevated in a time-dependent fashion in both VT models. Ly6Clo Mo/MØ were the predominant leukocyte source of IL-6. IL-6-/- mice demonstrated larger, non-resolving stasis thrombi with less neovascularization, despite a similar number of monocytes/macrophages (Mo/MØ). Adoptive transfer of WT BMDM into IL-6-/- mice undergoing stasis VT resulted in phenotype rescue. Human specimens of endophlebectomized tissue showed co-staining of Monocyte and IL-6 receptor. Thrombosis matrix analysis revealed significantly increased thrombus fibronectin and collagen in IL-6-/- mice. MMP9 activity in vitro depended on endogenous IL-6 expression in Mo/MØ, and IL-6-/- mice exhibited stunted matrix metalloproteinase activity. Lack of IL-6 signaling impairs thrombus resolution potentially via dysregulation of MMP-9 leading to impaired thrombus recanalization and resolution. Restoring or augmenting monocyte-mediated IL-6 signaling in IL-6 deficient or normal subjects, respectively, may represent a non-anticoagulant target to improve thrombus resolution.