Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Chest ; 133(2): 404-11, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18071011

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The relationship between eosinophilic airway inflammation and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), and the response to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy was examined. METHODS: Twenty-six steroid-naïve asthmatic patients with EIB were randomized to two parallel, double-blind, crossover study arms (13 subjects in each arm). Each arm compared two dose levels of inhaled ciclesonide that were administered for 3 weeks with a washout period of 3 to 8 weeks, as follows: (1) 40 vs 160 microg daily; and (2) 80 vs 320 microg daily. Baseline and weekly assessments with exercise challenge and sputum analysis were performed. RESULTS: Data were pooled and demonstrated that 10 subjects had baseline sputum eosinophilia >or= 5%. Only high-dose ICS therapy (ie, 160 and 320 microg) significantly attenuated the sputum eosinophil percentage. Sputum eosinophil percentage significantly correlated with EIB severity, and predicted the magnitude and temporal response of EIB to high-dose therapy, but not to low-dose therapy (ie, 40 and 80 microg). Low-dose ICS therapy provided a significant reduction in EIB at 1 week, with little additional improvement thereafter, irrespective of baseline sputum eosinophil counts. In contrast, high-dose ICS therapy provided a significantly greater improvement in EIB in subjects with sputum eosinophilia compared to those with an eosinophil count of < 5%. The difference between the eosinophilic groups in the magnitude of improvement in EIB was evident after the first week of high-dose ICS therapy and increased with time. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that eosinophilic airway inflammation may be important in modifying the severity of EIB and the response to ICS therapy. Measurements of sputum eosinophil percentage may, therefore, be useful in predicting the magnitude and temporal response of EIB to different dose levels of ICSs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrial.gov; Identifier: NCT00525772.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents/pharmacology , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/physiopathology , Bronchoconstriction/drug effects , Eosinophils/physiology , Pregnenediones/pharmacology , Sputum/chemistry , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Allergic Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Male , Pregnenediones/administration & dosage , Pregnenediones/therapeutic use , Spirometry
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 119(2): 322-7, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17141859

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of combination inhaled budesonide and formoterol as maintenance and reliever therapy significantly improves the risk and the time to exacerbations in asthma. OBJECTIVES: To explore the mechanisms underlying the effect of the reliever dose on exacerbations by examining the effect of combination therapy on the allergen challenge model when given after allergen exposure. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind crossover study, single doses of budesonide/formoterol (400/12 mug), formoterol (12 mug), budesonide (400 mug), or placebo were administered during the acute bronchoconstriction response (early airway response) immediately after allergen inhalation in 15 patients with mild asthma. Allergen-induced late airway response (LAR), sputum inflammatory markers, airway hyperresponsiveness, and exhaled nitric oxide were measured. RESULTS: All active treatments significantly attenuated the LAR, with budesonide/formoterol significantly better than its monocomponents (maximum FEV(1) fall: placebo, [mean +/- SEM] 21.2% +/- 3.1%; budesonide/formoterol, 4.2% +/- 1.4%; formoterol, 7.5% +/- 1.7%; budesonide, 10.4% +/- 1.6%). Allergen-induced change in methacholine PC(20) was significantly attenuated by budesonide/formoterol, but not by its monocomponents. Sputum cell counts and exhaled nitric oxide increased significantly after all allergen challenges, with no significant attenuation by any of the treatments. Therapy with combination and formoterol alone, but not budesonide, significantly reduced the early airway response. CONCLUSION: A single dose of budesonide/formoterol was superior to its monocomponents in attenuating the allergen-induced LAR and airway hyperresponsiveness. These effects may represent the contribution of the reliever dose to the budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever regimen. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The protective effect against allergic airway responses with a single reliever dose of budesonide/formoterol is predominantly related to greater functional antagonism of airway smooth muscles.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Asthma/drug therapy , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Ethanolamines/administration & dosage , Administration, Inhalation , Adolescent , Adult , Bronchial Hyperreactivity/drug therapy , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume/drug effects , Formoterol Fumarate , Humans , Male , Methacholine Chloride/pharmacology
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 117(5): 1008-13, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16675326

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroid therapy improves exercise symptoms in asthmatic subjects. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) as a method of determining the dose and time responses of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, cross-over study with 2 parallel arms, 4 doses of inhaled ciclesonide (40 microg and 160 microg or 80 microg and 320 microg) were compared over 3 weeks of treatment. Twenty-six asthmatic subjects (age range, 14-27 years) with baseline FEV1 values of greater than 70% of predicted value were enrolled. The primary outcome was the maximum percentage decrease in FEV1 after standardized exercise challenge. RESULTS: After 1 week of therapy, the mean +/- SEM reduction in maximum decrease in FEV1 in the ciclesonide 40-microg/80-microg dose group was 9% +/- 2.6% (95% CI, 3.9% to 14%), with no additional reduction thereafter. In the ciclesonide 160-microg/320-microg dose group, there was an 8.7% +/- 2.5% (95% CI, 3.7% to 13.7%) reduction in maximum decrease in FEV1 after week 1, which continued in a linear fashion during subsequent weeks of treatment. No difference was found between the 2 treatment arms in the temporal response of EIB to ciclesonide treatment. The maximum percentage attenuation in EIB achieved was 51.1% +/- 7.9%, which was achieved by using the 320-microg dose after 3 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A significant improvement in EIB was demonstrated for all doses of ciclesonide. Use of 160 microg/320 microg of ciclesonide resulted in a continuing improvement in FEV1 with time, and no plateau was seen in protective effect during 3 weeks of treatment. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Attenuation in exercise-induced decrease can be seen as early as after 1 week of therapy with inhaled ciclesonide at doses greater than 40 microg. However, maximal attenuation in exercise response continues to increase at doses greater than or equal to 200 microg, even after 3 weeks of therapy.


Subject(s)
Asthma, Exercise-Induced/drug therapy , Bronchoconstriction/drug effects , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Pregnenediones/pharmacology , Administration, Inhalation , Adolescent , Adult , Asthma, Exercise-Induced/physiopathology , Child , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...