Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transplant Proc ; 45(4): 1567-70, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23726621

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular mortality in renal transplant recipients is nearer 10-fold higher than in general population. Immunosuppressive therapy is one possible cause, for these drugs can modify cardiovascular risk factors, which can induce endothelial dysfunction, the first step in the process of atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to compare vasodilatatory function of endothelium in renal transplant recipients in relation to the immunosuppressive drug-cyclosporine or tacrolimus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 40 patients at 48.9 ± 36 months post-renal transplantation: 22 taking tacrolimus (group 1) and 18 taking cyclosporine (group 2). The renal transplant recipients were compared with a control group of 18 healthy people. Endothelial function was assessed by peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) using the EndoPAT 2000 device to measure RHI (reactive hyperemia index) and AI% (augmentation index%). RESULTS: The overall median values of RHI were higher than the value accepted as a normal (1.67). The RHI median value in group 1 was 2.00 (quartile 1: 1.66; quartile 2: 2.72), not different from that in group 2 [1.90 (quartile 1: 1.56; quartile 2: 2.17)] or the controls [2.11 (quartile 1: 1.77; quartile 2: 2.50)]. Multivariate analysis revealed age to be the independent factor influencing RHI in all examined groups but treatment with calcium channel blockers appeared to be the only independent factor influencing RHI among renal transplant recipients. AI% values were not significantly different between the 2 groups of renal transplant recipients, but it was significantly higher among the controls than among subjects treated with tacrolimus. CONCLUSIONS: Vasodilatatory function of endothelium assessed by PAT in renal transplant recipients was not worse than in healthy people. It was not different between cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Arterial stiffness measured as AI% depend on age but not the calcineurin inhibitor, which showed little effect.


Subject(s)
Cyclosporine/administration & dosage , Endothelium, Vascular/drug effects , Hyperemia/physiopathology , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Kidney Transplantation , Tacrolimus/administration & dosage , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cyclosporine/pharmacology , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacology , Male , Middle Aged , Tacrolimus/pharmacology
2.
QJM ; 106(2): 105-15, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23097390

ABSTRACT

Until a few years ago, the mainstay of anti-platelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel, a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. However, current clinical practice has now changed with the introduction of ticagrelor, a more potent cardiovascular drug than clopidogrel, without the limitations related to clopidogrel therapy. In this review, we provide a critical overview of ticagrelor in ACS, highlight the results with ticagrelor in several subgroups of patients and discuss the future trials.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Adenosine/analogs & derivatives , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Acute Coronary Syndrome/physiopathology , Adenosine/administration & dosage , Adenosine/pharmacology , Adenosine/therapeutic use , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Clopidogrel , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment , Ticagrelor , Ticlopidine/analogs & derivatives , Ticlopidine/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...