Influence of Measurement Depth and Acquisition Parameters on Shear Wave Speed and Shear Wave Dispersion in Certified Phantoms Using a Canon Aplio Clinical Ultrasound Scanner.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the work described here was to investigate the relative contribution of confounding factors on liver shear wave speed (SWS) and shear wave dispersion slope (SWDS) measurements in three certified phantoms using a Canon Aplio clinical ultrasound scanner. METHODS: A Canon Aplio i800 i-series ultrasound system (Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Tochigi, Japan) with i8CX1 convex array (center frequency = 4 MHz) was used to examine dependencies caused by the depth, width and height of the acquisition box (AQB), the depth and size of the region of interest (ROI), the AQB angle and the pressure of the ultrasound probe on the surface of the phantom. RESULTS: Results revealed that depth is the most significant confounder in both SWS and SWDS measurements. AQB angle, height and width and ROI size exhibited minimal confounding effects on measurements. For SWS, the most consistent measurement depth is when the top of the AQB is placed between 2 and 4 cm, and the ROI is located between 3 and 7 cm deep. For SWDS, results indicate that measurement values significantly decrease with depth from the surface of the phantom until approximately 7 cm deep, and consequently no stable area of AQB placement or ROI depth exists. CONCLUSION: In contrast to SWS, the same ideal acquisition depth range cannot necessarily be applied to SWDS measurements because of a significant depth dependency.

Breast Density Assessment in Young Women with Ultrasound based on Speed of Sound: Influence of the Menstrual Cycle.

To investigate changes in breast density (BD) during the menstrual cycle in young women in comparison to inter-breast and -segment changes as well as reproducibility of a novel Speed-of-Sound (SoS) Ultrasound (US) method.SoS-US uses a conventional US system with a reflector and a software add-on to quantify SoS in the retro-mammillary, inner and outer segments of both breasts. Twenty healthy women (18-40 years) with regular menstrual cycles were scanned twice with two weeks in-between. Three of these were additionally measured twice per week for 25 days. Average SoS (m/s) and ΔSoS (segment-variation SoS; m/s) were measured. Variations between follicular and luteal phases and changes over the four-week period were assessed. Inter-examiner and inter-reader agreements were also evaluated. Variances between cycle phases, examiners and readers were compared.No significant SoS difference was observed between follicular and luteal phases for the twenty women (P = .126), and between all different days for the three more frequently measured women (P = .892). Inter-reader (ICC = 0.999) and inter-examiner (ICC = 0.990) agreements were high. The SoS variance due to menstrual variations was not significantly larger than the inter-examiner uncertainty (P = .461). Inter-reader variations were significantly smaller than menstrual and examiner variations (P < .001).SoS-US showed high inter-examiner and inter-reader reproducibility. The alterations during the menstrual cycles were not significantly larger than the confidence interval of measurements.