ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic antireflux radiofrequency treatment (Stretta) offers a therapeutic alternative for patients suffering from refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Current evidence suggests that the treatment may improve symptoms of GORD and decrease requirement for proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. METHODS: Prospective assessment of patients undergoing Stretta, between October 2014 and February 2016, in a UK tertiary referral centre was carried. All patients were assessed for suitability using endoscopy, contrast studies, and pH and manometry studies. The Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) was used to evaluate symptoms along with PPI dependency, pre-Stretta and post-Stretta treatment. Patients were followed up by outpatient clinic appointment and telephone consultation. RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients were followed up for a median of 771 days (range 499-1162) following treatment with Stretta. The average GERD-HRQL score improved from 46.2/75 (±14.2) preprocedure to 15.2/75 (±17.3) postprocedure. Dissatisfaction with GORD as measured in the GERD-HRQL decreased from 100% to 10% with three patients showing no improvement (non-responders) at follow up and two late failures at the time of this review. There were no complications and all cases were carried out as day cases. CONCLUSION: There are currently few effective therapeutic alternatives to antireflux surgery for refractory GORD. This series corroborates the value and safety of Stretta as a viable option for selected patients who are unwilling or unable to undergo an operation. Stretta improves quality of life and decreases PPI dependency in selected patients with GORD.
ABSTRACT
In laparoscopic 'paraoesophageal hernia' (POH) repair, non-absorbable suture materials have been used to close the crural defects. More recently, various types of prosthetic mesh have been utilized to repair the defect. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis of the recent and up to-date studies incorporating 942 POH repairs. We examined the rates of recurrence, reoperation, and complication rates alongside operative time of these two techniques in the management POH. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies comparing mesh hiatal hernioplasty versus Suture cruroplasty for Paraoesophageal hernia were selected by searching Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central database published between January 1995 and December 2016. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select the studies. The outcome variables analysed are recurrence of hiatal hernia, reoperation, operative time and complications. Nine studies (RCTs = 4 and Observational studies = 5) were analysed totalling 942 patients (Mesh = 517, Suture cruroplasty = 425). The pooled effect size for recurrence favoured mesh repair over suture cruroplasty (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32, 0.73, P < 0.05). But the operation time is significantly less in suture cruroplasty (SMD 15.40, 95% CI 7.92, 22.88, P < 0.0001). Comparable effect sizes were noted for both groups which included reoperation (OR 0.35, 95%CI 0.09, 1.31, P = 0.12) and complication rates (OR 1.30, 95%CI 0.74, 2.29, P = 0.36). Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that mesh hiatoplasty and suture cruroplasty produce comparable results with regards to reoperation rate and complications following the repair of paraoesophageal hernias (POH). Moreover, the study showed significant reduction of recurrence following mesh hiatoplasty.
