Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 35(7): 2155-2165, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33069556

ABSTRACT

Patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery are exposed to opioids in the operating room and intensive care unit and after hospital discharge. Opportunities exist to reduce perioperative opioid use at all stages of care and include alternative oral and intravenous medications, novel intraoperative regional anesthetic techniques, and postoperative opioid-sparing sedative and analgesic strategies. In this review, currently used and investigational strategies to reduce the opioid burden for cardiothoracic surgical patients are explored.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Opioid-Related Disorders , Analgesics, Opioid , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Critical Care , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control
2.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 45(10): 799-804, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32868483

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Peripheral nerve blocks have been integrated into most multimodal analgesia protocols for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The adductor canal block (ACB) has gained popularity because of its quadriceps muscle sparing. Similarly, local anesthetic injection between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of the knee, IPACK block, has been described to provide analgesia to the posterior capsule of the knee with motor-sparing qualities. This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to assess the analgesic efficacy of adding the IPACK block to our current multimodal analgesic regimen, including the ACB, in patients undergoing primary TKA. METHODS: 119 patients were randomized to receive either an IPACK or a sham block in addition to multimodal analgesia and an ACB. We were set to assess pain in the back of the knee 6 hours after surgery. Other end points included quality of recovery after surgery, pain scores, opioid requirements, and functional measures. RESULTS: Patients who received the IPACK block had less pain in the back of the knee 6 hours after surgery when compared with the sham block: 21.7% vs 45.8%, p<0.01. There was marginal improvement in other pain measures in the first 24 hours after surgery. However, opioid requirements, quality of recovery and functional measures were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The IPACK block reduced the incidence of posterior knee pain 6 hours postoperatively.


Subject(s)
Analgesia , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Nerve Block , Analgesics/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Humans , Nerve Block/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
3.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 68(4): 835-840, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32124973

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Although peripheral nerve blocks are associated with improved pain control and end outcomes among older adults with hip fracture, their current utilization among US hip fracture patients is not well understood. We characterized contemporary use of peripheral nerve blocks after hip fracture over time and identified predictors of nerve block receipt. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of claims data from one large national private US insurer. SETTING: US acute care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 94 985 adults aged 50 years and older hospitalized for a femoral neck, intertrochanteric, or subtrochanteric fracture; 409 263 adults aged 50 years and older hospitalized for elective hip or knee arthroplasty between 2004 and 2016. MEASUREMENTS: Receipt of a peripheral nerve block for pain control, based on Current Procedural Terminology codes in physician service claims. RESULTS: Overall, 2874 hip fracture patients (3.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.9-3.1) received a nerve block for pain control, and the percentage receiving a block increased from .4% in 2004-2006 (95% CI = .3%-.6%) to 4.6% in 2013-2016 (95% CI = 4.4%-4.8%; P < .001). The adjusted odds of receiving a nerve block was lower for patients with vs without dementia (odds ratio [OR] = .88; 95% CI = .80-.98; P = .02) and among patients aged 75 to 84 vs 64 years or younger (OR = .86; 95% CI = .74-1.00; P = .02). The odds of nerve block receipt did not vary according to race, ethnicity, fracture location, or most other common comorbidities. Compared with patients with hip fracture, the adjusted odds of nerve block receipt were 2 times higher among patients undergoing elective hip replacement and more than 30 times higher among patients undergoing elective knee replacement. CONCLUSION: Although use of peripheral nerve blocks for pain control after hip fracture has increased over time, fewer than 5 of every 100 patients hospitalized with hip fracture currently receive a peripheral nerve block, suggesting possible underuse. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:835-840, 2020.


Subject(s)
Hip Fractures/therapy , Nerve Block/statistics & numerical data , Pain Management/methods , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/statistics & numerical data , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/statistics & numerical data , Case-Control Studies , Female , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Retrospective Studies
4.
Pain Med ; 20(5): 1012-1019, 2019 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30113685

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Pain control after shoulder arthroscopy can be challenging, often relying on opioids. The study aims to measure the quality of recovery (QoR) before and after implementation of a "Multimodal Perioperative Pain Protocol" (MP3) in patients undergoing ambulatory shoulder arthroscopy. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Free-standing ambulatory surgery facility of a tertiary care academic center. SUBJECTS: Patients undergoing ambulatory shoulder arthroscopy. METHODS: The primary end point of the study was the QoR-9 score at 24 hours, 48 hours, and one week after surgery. Secondary end points included 1) measuring the quality of pain management using the Revised American Pain Society Patient Oriented Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) and 2) postoperative opioid requirements. RESULTS: Data from132 patients in the control group (pre-intervention) and 120 patients in the MP3 group were analyzed. The QoR-9 scores were significantly higher for the MP3 group at all time points, but only met the minimal clinical important difference threshold at 24 hours (13.4 vs 14.9, P < 0.05) and 48 hours (14.0 vs 15.0, P < 0.05) postoperatively. Patients reported better quality of pain management after implementation of the MP3 in the domains of pain intensity, pain interference with activity, and sleep, and they reported the presence of negative emotions up to two days after ambulatory shoulder surgery. In addition, this protocol significantly reduced opioid consumption up to three days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the MP3 improved the overall QoR and many aspects of postoperative pain relief while reducing total opioid consumption in patients undergoing ambulatory shoulder surgery.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Arthroscopy/adverse effects , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Shoulder/surgery , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recovery of Function
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...