Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the exactness of simulated clinical impressions and stone replicas of crown preparations, using digitization and virtual three-dimensional analysis. METHODS: Three master dies (mandibular incisor, canine and molar) were prepared for full crowns, mounted in full dental arches in a plane line articulator. Eight impressions were taken using an experimental monophase vinyl polysiloxane-based material. Stone replicas were poured in type IV stone (Vel-Mix Stone; Kerr). The master dies and the stone replicas were digitized in a touch-probe scanner (Procera) Forte; Nobel Biocare AB) and the impressions in a laser scanner (D250, 3Shape A/S), to create virtual models. The resulting point-clouds from the digitization of the master dies were used as CAD-Reference-Models (CRM). Discrepancies between the points in the pointclouds and the corresponding CRM were measured by a matching-software (CopyCAD 6.504 SP2; Delcam Plc). The distribution of the discrepancies was analyzed and depicted on color-difference maps. RESULTS: The discrepancies of the digitized impressions and the stone replicas compared to the CRM were of similar size with a mean+/-SD within 40microm, with the exception of two of the digitized molar impressions. The precision of the digitized impressions and stone replicas did not differ significantly (F=4.2; p=0.053). However, the shape affected the digitization (F=5.4; p=0.013) and the interaction effect of shape and digitization source (impression or stone replica) was pronounced (F=28; p<0.0001). The reliability was high for both digitization methods, evaluated by repeated digitizations. SIGNIFICANCE: The exactness of the digitized impressions varied with shape. Both impressions and stone replicas can be digitized repeatedly with a high reliability.

Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD/CAM technology.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the reproducibility of digitized dental stone replicas compared to the master model and the reliability of the computer aided analysis. METHODS: Four master dies, prepared for complete crowns were fabricated in presintered yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP). Eight vinyl polysiloxane impressions (PROVIL novo; Heraeus Kulzer) were taken of each die and stone replicas were poured in type IV stone (Vel-Mix Stone; Kerr). The master dies and the stone replicas were digitized in a touch-probe scanner (Procera Forte; Nobel Biocare AB), to create triangulated surface-models. The point-cloud from the first of the repeated digitizations of each master die was used as CAD-reference-models (CRM). Discrepancies between the points in the triangulated surface-models and the corresponding CRM were measured by a matching-software (CopyCAD 6.504 SP2; Delcam Plc). The distribution of the discrepancies was analyzed and presented in color-difference-maps. RESULTS: The precision of the measuring method, presented as the repeatability coefficient, ranged between 7 and 16 microm (entire surface), whereas the analysis of the stone replicas revealed a precision (repeatability coefficient) ranging from 19 to 26 microm. The accuracy of the replica to master (the mean discrepancy) ranged from 0.5 to 2.0 microm (95% confidence interval 1.5-2.9 microm). SIGNIFICANCE: The greatest precision of the measurement was seen in the jacket surface of the die. The size of the stone replicas varied and the repeatability coefficient was on average 15 microm (2-25 microm) greater for the replica-to-master alignment than the repeated digitizations of the master.

A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The fit of a dental restoration depends on quality throughout the entire manufacturing process. There is difficulty in assessing the surface topography of an object with a complex form, such as teeth, since there is no exact reference form. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the repeatability and relative accuracy of 2 dental surface digitization devices. A computer-aided design (CAD) technique was used for evaluation to calculate and present the deviations 3-dimensionally. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten dies of teeth prepared for complete crowns were fabricated in presintered yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP). The surfaces were digitized 3 times each with an optical or mechanical digitizer. The number of points in the point clouds from each reading were calculated and used as the CAD reference model (CRM). Alignments were performed by registration software that works by minimizing a distance criterion. In color-difference maps, the distribution of the discrepancies between the surfaces in the CRM and the 3-dimensional surface models was identified and located. RESULTS: The repeatability of both scanners was within 10 microm, based on SD and absolute mean values. The qualitative evaluation resulted in an even distribution of the deviations in the optical digitizer, whereas the dominating part of the surfaces in the mechanical digitizer showed no deviations. The relative accuracy of the 2 surface digitization devices was within +/- 6 microm, based on median values. CONCLUSION: The repeatability of the optical digitizer was comparable with the mechanical digitization device, and the relative accuracy was similar.

The influence of surface topography of ceramic abutments on the attachment and proliferation of human oral fibroblasts.

As different implant abutments are introduced to obtain a sufficient soft tissue barrier, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of three different surface modifications of densely sintered high-purity aluminium oxide on morphology, attachment and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts. Fibroblasts were cultured on pressed aluminium oxide, milled, and then sintered to full density (1), on pressed, densely sintered (2), and on pressed, densely sintered and then polished surfaces (3). The different surfaces were analyzed using a confocal laser scanner, an atomic force microscope and a scanning electron microscope. The cell profile areas were measured using a semiautomatic interactive image analyzer and the figures were expressed as percent of attachment. The polished specimens had the smoothest surfaces and the roughest were the milled surfaces in terms of height deviation. No difference was found in the spacing between the peaks on the polished surfaces compared to the milled surfaces. Fibroblasts on the milled ceramic appeared to follow the direction of the fine irregularities on the surface. The analyses showed the polished surfaces had significantly higher percentages of initial cell attachment than the other surfaces (P < 0.05). After 3 days of cell culture, significantly more cells were attached to the milled and sintered surfaces than to the polished one, possibly indicating higher proliferation capacity on those types of surfaces.