How to avoid early mortality in acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), a phenotypically and genotypically unique subtype of acute myeloid leukemia, has seen unprecedented advances in its management since the introduction of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide. However, the phenomenal pharmacologic conversion of this once highly fatal disease to one with a long-term survival exceeding 90% among patients who survive induction remains impaired by the significant incidence of early death (ED) reaching 30% in some real-world studies. The key driver for ED in APL is catastrophic hemorrhage with a proclivity for cranial sites. Most EDs in APL are currently considered preventable. Here, we discuss the concept of early death in APL and its characteristics. Importantly, we outline implementable strategies to reduce the incidence of ED. Early recognition of APL underpins these preventive measures as significant delays in the diagnosis increase the likelihood of ED. While early administration of ATRA is often taught to all hematology trainees, this lifesaving intervention is only possible if providers, including those in emergency departments and urgent/immediate care settings, are trained to have a high index of suspicion and competence to recognize the morphologic and clinical characteristics of the disease. Other proposed strategies tackle the complications that can be present at diagnosis or arise during induction therapy and address the issues of expert consultation and protocol adherence in the management of these patients. While some of these measures appear intuitive and others aspirational, widespread adoption could bring about an era of cure for almost every patient with APL.

Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There have been significant advances in the treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) over the past two decades. However, the intention of treatment remains control of the disease and delay of progression rather than a cure which remains largely elusive. Considering that CLL is mostly seen in older patients, there are multiple factors that play a role in the selection of CLL beyond the frontline treatment. Here, we review the concept of relapsed CLL, factors that predispose to relapse, and therapeutic options available to this patient population. We also review investigational therapies and provide a framework for selection of therapies in this setting. RECENT FINDINGS: Targeted therapies with continuous BTK inhibitors (BTKi) or fixed duration venetoclax plus anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy have established superiority over chemoimmunotherapy in relapsed CLL and have become the preferred standard of care treatment. The second-generation more selective BTK inhibitors (acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib) have shown improved safety profile compared to ibrutinib. However, resistance to the covalent BTK inhibitors may emerge and is commonly associated with mutations in BTK or other downstream enzymes. The novel non-covalent BTK inhibitors such as pirtobrutinib (Loxo-305) and nemtabrutinib (ARQ 531) are showing promising activities for relapsed CLL refractory to prior covalent BTKi. Other novel therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy have also shown significant activities for relapsed and refractory CLL. Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment has a growing importance in venetoclax-based limited-duration therapy and there is mounting evidence that MRD negativity improves outcomes. However, it remains to be seen if this will become an established clinically significant endpoint. Further, the optimal sequence of various treatment options remains to be determined. Patients with relapsed CLL now have more options for the treatment of the disease. The choice of therapy is best individualized especially in the absence of direct comparisons of targeted therapies, and the coming years will bring more data on the best sequence of use of the therapeutic agents.

A safe and effective use of caplacizumab in pregnancy-related acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is not uncommonly seen in pregnancy, either with the first episode or with the exacerbation of known disease. The management of TTP in pregnancy can be challenging if there is refractoriness to the use of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and high-dose corticosteroids. Caplacizumab, a vWF-directed humanized antibody fragment, is approved for the treatment of acquired TTP but there is sparse data on its use in pregnant patients. Antenatal and peripartum haemorrhage is a theoretical concern with the use of the medication in the obstetric population. However, as options for treatment of TTP in the patients who have refractory disease are significantly limited, off-label use of caplacizumab to achieve disease control and prevent maternofetal morbidity and mortality is a reasonable consideration. This article described the successful use of caplacizumab in a pregnant patient with acquired TTP and the associated favourable outcome. The patient suffered an exacerbation following initial TPE and became refractory to both plasma exchange and high-dose corticosteroids. Off-label use of caplacizumab resulted in hematologic recovery and successful delivery of a healthy neonate. This case represents a contribution to the sparse literature on the use of this effective medication in an often-challenging clinical situation.

Hereditary thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura acquired through liver transplantation: A case report.

A 62-year-old received orthotopic liver transplantation. Three weeks later, thrombotic microangiopathy developed. Testing revealed thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) characterized by low ADAMTS13 (A Disintegrin-like Metallopeptidase with ThromboSpondin type 1 motif 13) activity and no inhibitor of ADAMTS13 protein. Retrospective attainment of donor records revealed a TTP diagnosis, presumably hereditary TTP (hTTP), as an ADAMTS13 protein inhibitor was not mentioned. As the grafted liver does not produce ADAMTS13 protein, the recipient now functionally has hTTP and will likely need plasma transfusions indefinitely. While hTTP is extremely rare, it should be considered a contraindication to liver donation outside of exceptional circumstances. If a potential liver donor has TTP listed on medical history, attempts should be made to determine whether it is autoimmune or hereditary. An accurate medical history is critical as it is the only reliable way to identify hTTP, as outside of acute exacerbations of TTP, donors with hTTP can have normal laboratory values, including normal hemoglobin, platelets, and renal function.

Gastrointestinal Presentations of Common Variable Immunodeficiency: Hiding in Plain Sight.

Primary immunodeficiency disorders typically have an onset in childhood. The suspicion for these conditions usually arises from a history of recurrent respiratory, gastrointestinal, or cutaneous infections with a history often dating back to infancy or early childhood. However, adults can also be affected. Common variable immunodeficiency, which usually has an onset/diagnosis in adulthood, is the most common symptomatic primary immunodeficiency. However, as its presentation could be manifold, its diagnosis is often delayed. The gastrointestinal tract is the second most affected system after the respiratory tract; symptoms associated with the gastrointestinal tract are often intractable. As patients with common variable immunodeficiency are often misdiagnosed, a high index of suspicion and clinical correlation is required for the appropriate diagnosis of this potentially debilitating condition.

Unusual BK polyomavirus-associated urologic malignancies in renal transplant recipients: Report of two cases and review of the literature.

Renal transplant recipients are at increased risk of developing urologic malignancies, some of which are associated with prolonged BK virus infection. We report two cases of BK virus-associated carcinoma with variant morphological patterns (clear cell adenocarcinoma of the bladder and micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the pelvicaliceal system) arising in the urinary tract of renal transplant recipients. In both cases, the diagnosis was initially established on cytologic specimens: on urine cytology in one patient and on fine needle aspiration of an inguinal lymph node in the other patient. The unusual cytologic features of both cases (multiple morphologies in one patient and micropapillary pattern in the other), co-occurrence of decoy cells in the urine of one patient and the occurrence of these tumors in renal transplant recipients raised the possibility of BK polyomavirus-associated malignancy and led to confirmatory SV40 immunostains that were positive. These cases expand the morphologic variants of BK virus-associated urologic malignancies diagnosed in solid organ transplant patients. While differentiating BK virus-infected cells from malignant cells in urine cytology specimens is a diagnostic challenge, greater awareness of their possible co-existence is vital, as this could be the only chance for an early diagnosis.