Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Agromedicine ; 18(4): 304-11, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24125045

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT A convenience survey of swine workers on large and small commercial farms in the Northeast and Midwest United States regarding zoonotic influenza awareness and precautions was conducted. Workers reported low levels of concern regarding the risk of contracting influenza from swine, and were generally not aware of national guidelines for influenza prevention. Use of personal protective equipment (PPE) varied by task, N95 respirator use was rare, and no workers were enrolled in respirator programs. Reported influenza vaccination coverage was greater than the national average in 2009-2010, but declined in 2010-2011. Workers on large farms were more likely to use PPE in some tasks and to report using more precautions when pigs appeared ill. Although reporting low levels of concern regarding zoonotic influenza and low adherence to national influenza guidelines, swine workers reported making task-based and risk-based decisions about use of PPE, suggesting opportunities for enhanced prevention of zoonotic disease transmission.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/transmission , Swine , Zoonoses/transmission , Adult , Animals , Connecticut , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Male , Massachusetts , Middle Aged , Nebraska , Protective Devices , United States , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
2.
Pediatrics ; 128(6): e1474-81, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22084328

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Electronic immunization information systems (IISs) are now established in almost all US states. We used the IIS in Minnesota, Georgia, and Connecticut for immunization data and as the source of 1 of 2 control groups to measure pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (RV5) effectiveness (VE) using case-control methodology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Case-subjects were vaccine-eligible children who presented to 1 of 5 hospitals or emergency departments with gastroenteritis and had rotavirus antigen detected in stool during any of 3 rotavirus seasons (2007-2009). Two control groups were used: children with gastroenteritis who tested negative for rotavirus and children from the IIS matched by zip code and birth date. In Minnesota and Georgia, immunization records for rotavirus-positive and -negative children were also obtained from providers. RESULTS: Overall, 402 (96%) rotavirus case-subjects and 825 (97%) rotavirus-negative controls who met eligibility criteria were found in the IISs. Ten IIS controls were identified for each case. VE estimates for RV5 were similar across control groups, immunization data sources, and states. VE point estimates for 3 vs 0 doses were 89% to 94% among children aged 8 months or older and 86% to 92% among those aged 24 months or older. VE for 2 doses was ≥90% among children aged 8 months or older, and VE for 1 dose was 66% among those aged 6 weeks through 5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Three RV5 doses confer sustained protection against rotavirus disease during the first 3 years of life in US children. Two RV5 doses also seem to provide good protection. IISs can be valuable tools for assessing the effectiveness of vaccines administered to young children.


Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Gastroenteritis/virology , Information Systems , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Case-Control Studies , Child, Preschool , Connecticut , Georgia , Humans , Infant , Minnesota , Retrospective Studies
3.
BMC Vet Res ; 5: 15, 2009 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19389228

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In order to identify priorities for building integrated surveillance systems that effectively model and predict human risk of zoonotic diseases, there is a need for improved understanding of the practical options for linking surveillance data of animals and humans. We conducted an analysis of the literature and characterized the linkage between animal and human health data. We discuss the findings in relation to zoonotic surveillance and the linkage of human and animal data. METHODS: The Canary Database, an online bibliographic database of animal-sentinel studies was searched and articles were classified according to four linkage categories. RESULTS: 465 studies were identified and assigned to linkage categories involving: descriptive, analytic, molecular, or no human outcomes of human and animal health. Descriptive linkage was the most common, whereby both animal and human health outcomes were presented, but without quantitative linkage between the two. Rarely, analytic linkage was utilized in which animal data was used to quantitatively predict human risk. The other two categories included molecular linkage, and no human outcomes, which present health outcomes in animals but not humans. DISCUSSION: We found limited use of animal data to quantitatively predict human risk and listed the methods from the literature that performed analytic linkage. The lack of analytic linkage in the literature might not be solely related to technological barriers including access to electronic database, statistical software packages, and Geographical Information System (GIS). Rather, the problem might be from a lack of understanding by researchers of the importance of animal data as a 'sentinel' for human health. Researchers performing zoonotic surveillance should be aware of the value of animal-sentinel approaches for predicting human risk and consider analytic methods for linking animal and human data. Qualitative work needs to be done in order to examine researchers' decisions in linkage strategies between animal and human data.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual/standards , Population Surveillance/methods , Public Health/methods , Zoonoses , Animals , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Odds Ratio , Regression Analysis
4.
Ecohealth ; 5(2): 224-9, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18787924

ABSTRACT

Linking human health risk to environmental factors can be a challenge for clinicians, public health departments, and environmental health researchers. While it is possible that nonhuman animal species could help identify and mitigate such linkages, the fields of animal and human health remain far apart, and the prevailing human health attitude toward disease events in animals is an "us vs. them" paradigm that considers the degree of threat that animals themselves pose to humans. An alternative would be the development of the concepts of animals as models for environmentally induced disease, as well as potential "sentinels" providing early warning of both noninfectious and infectious hazards in the environment. For such concepts to truly develop, critical knowledge gaps need to be addressed using a "shared risk" paradigm based on the comparative biology of environment-host interactions in different species.


Subject(s)
Ecosystem , Environmental Health , Hazardous Substances/analysis , Risk Assessment/methods , Sentinel Surveillance , Zoonoses/epidemiology , Animals , Humans
5.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 46(2): 93-100, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18259955

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this systematic review was to identify evidence that animals could serve as sentinels of an attack with a chemical terrorism agent. METHODS: The biomedical literature was systematically searched for evidence that wild or domestic animals exposed to certain chemical weapons of terrorism had either greater susceptibility, shorter latency period, or increased exposure risk versus humans. Additionally, we searched for documented reports of such animals historically serving as sentinels for chemical warfare agents. RESULTS: For a small number of agents, there was limited evidence that domestic and/or wild animals could provide sentinel information to humans following an airborne attack with chemical agents, usually related to increased potential for environmental exposure. Some of this evidence was based on anecdotal case reports, and in many cases high quality chemical terrorism agent evidence regarding comparative susceptibility, exposure, and latency between humans and sentinel animal species was not found. CONCLUSION: Currently, there is insufficient evidence for routine use of animals as sentinels for airborne chemical warfare agents. At the same time, Poison Center surveillance systems should include animal calls, and greater communication between veterinarians and physicians could help with preparedness for a chemical terrorism attack. Further analysis of comparative chemical warfare agent toxicity between sentinel animal species and humans is needed.


Subject(s)
Chemical Terrorism/prevention & control , Chemical Warfare Agents/analysis , Evidence-Based Medicine , Sentinel Surveillance/veterinary , Animals , Chemical Warfare Agents/poisoning , Disease Susceptibility/chemically induced , Disease Susceptibility/diagnosis , Humans
6.
Am Fam Physician ; 76(9): 1314-22, 2007 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18019874

ABSTRACT

Human contact with cats, dogs, and other pets results in several million infections each year in the United States, ranging from self-limited skin conditions to life-threatening systemic illnesses. Toxoplasmosis is one of the most common pet-related parasitic infections. Although toxoplasmosis is usually asymptomatic or mild, it may cause serious congenital infection if a woman is exposed during pregnancy, particularly in the first trimester. Common pet-borne fungal infections include tinea corporis/capitis (ringworm); campylobacteriosis and salmonellosis are among the most common bacterial infections associated with pet ownership. Less commonly, pets can transmit arthropod-borne and viral illnesses (e.g., scabies, rabies). Infection in a pet can provide sentinel warning of local vectors and endemic conditions, such as Lyme disease risk. Treatment is infection-specific, although many infections are self-limited. Prevention involves common sense measures such as adequate hand washing, proper disposal of animal waste, and ensuring that infected animals are diagnosed and treated. Special precautions are indicated for immunocompromised persons. Increased communication between primary care physicians and veterinarians could improve treatment and prevention of these conditions.


Subject(s)
Animals, Domestic , Zoonoses/transmission , Animals , Disease Vectors , Humans
7.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 12(4): 647-52, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16704814

ABSTRACT

We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature from 1966 to 2005 to determine whether animals could provide early warning of a bioterrorism attack, serve as markers for ongoing exposure risk, and amplify or propagate a bioterrorism outbreak. We found evidence that, for certain bioterrorism agents, pets, wildlife, or livestock could provide early warning and that for other agents, humans would likely manifest symptoms before illness could be detected in animals. After an acute attack, active surveillance of wild or domestic animal populations could help identify many ongoing exposure risks. If certain bioterrorism agents found their way into animal populations, they could spread widely through animal-to-animal transmission and prove difficult to control. The public health infrastructure must look beyond passive surveillance of acute animal disease events to build capacity for active surveillance and intervention efforts to detect and control ongoing outbreaks of disease in domestic and wild animal populations.


Subject(s)
Bioterrorism/statistics & numerical data , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Sentinel Surveillance/veterinary , Animals , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Bioterrorism/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Humans , Virus Diseases/epidemiology , Virus Diseases/veterinary
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...