Proximal humeral fractures in children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to investigate possible reasons for the failure of closed reduction of proximal humerus fractures in children and adolescents. We assessed the rate of soft tissue entrapment, and we also investigated the long-term clinical and radiological results after an age- and deformity-focused treatment regimen according to national guidelines. METHODS: Forty-three patients were included in the study. Ten (mean age, 12.4 years; range, 6-16 years) of the patients were treated conservatively. The remaining 33 patients (mean age, 14 years; range, 6-18 years) were treated surgically (n = 2 Neer grade 2, n = 16 Neer grade 3, and n = 15 Neer grade 4) with either closed (n = 16) or open reduction with internal fixation. In 17 fractures, closed anatomical reduction of the fracture under general anesthesia was not possible. Subsequent open reduction and Kirschner wire or screw fixation (n = 12) or plate fixation (n = 5) was necessary. In 9 of these 17 fractures (5 fractures were totally displaced fractures), closed reduction was impossible because of the entrapment of periost (n = 2) or the biceps tendon with parts of the periost (n = 7). At follow-up, the clinical assessment included a structured interview, a detailed physical examination, and the assessment of overall shoulder function with the Constant score. RESULTS: Operative and postoperative complications did not occur. All surgically treated fractures anatomically reduced and healed without loss of reduction. At a mean follow-up of 39 months (range, 12-118 months), all patients who were evaluated had excellent results according to the Constant score and had a normal range of motion and excellent strength of the shoulder joint. CONCLUSIONS: A failed closed reduction should be interpreted as a possible soft tissue entrapment most likely because of the long biceps tendon. Those cases should be addressed with open reduction and removal of the entrapped structures. If anatomical reduction is achieved and maintained until fracture healing, excellent functional and radiological results can be expected from an age- and deformity-focused treatment regimen for children and adolescents with proximal humeral fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4 (Therapeutic study).

Does fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis solve the problems of a fractured proximal humerus? A prospective series of 87 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is considerable controversy about the treatment of complex, displaced proximal humeral fractures. Various types of head-preserving osteosynthesis have been suggested. This prospective case series was designed to evaluate the perioperative and early postoperative complications associated with fixed-angle implants and to record outcome after bone healing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fractures of the proximal humerus were stabilized surgically in 87 patients (mean age 64 (16-93) years) by application of a fixed-angle plate (65 PHILOS, 22 T-LCP). There were 34 2-segment fractures, 42 3-segment fractures, and 11 4-segment fractures, including 7 dislocation fractures. Follow-up assessment after a minimum of 12 months was based on the Constant, UCLA, and DASH scores and on radiographs. RESULTS: Postoperative complications included soft tissue problems (n = 9), humeral head necrosis (n = 9), screw perforation (n = 11), secondary displacements (n = 14), and delayed fracture healing (n = 4). Treatment outcomes recorded on the various scores were very good in 60-82% of the cases. INTERPRETATION: Screw perforation of fixed-angle implants has replaced the complications of secondary displacement and implant loosening after using conventional plates. Even with the use of fixed-angle implants, fractures of the proximal humerus are associated with a high complication rate and sometimes poor outcome.