A small yet comprehensive subset of human experimental pain models emerging from correlation analysis with a clinical quantitative sensory testing protocol in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Picturing the complexity of pain in human experimental settings has increased the predictivity for clinical pain but requires increasingly complex test batteries. This raises problems in studies in which time is objectively limited, for example by the course of action of an analgesic drug. We addressed the selection of a small yet comprehensive set of pain tests for the use in such a situation. METHOD: Nineteen different pain measures from 'classical' pain models (n = 9) and a clinically established QST-pain test battery (n = 10), were obtained from 72 healthy volunteers (34 men). The nonparametric correlation structure among the various pain measures was analysed using Ward clustering. RESULTS: Four clusters emerged, each consisting of highly correlated pain measures. The pain model groups emerged comprised (I) pain thresholds and tolerances to blunt pressure or electrical pain; (II) pain thresholds to thermal stimuli; (III) pain measures obtained following application of punctate mechanical, intranasal CO2 chemical or cutaneous laser heat stimuli; and (IV) detection thresholds to thermal stimuli. The first three clusters agreed with an immediate mechanistic interpretation as reflecting C-fibre mediated pain, thermal pain and Aδ-fibre mediated pain, respectively, whereas the last cluster contained non-painful measures and was disregarded. CONCLUSIONS: When basing a selection of a small comprehensive set of pain models on the assumption that highly correlated pain measures account for redundant results and therefore, one member of each group suffices an economic yet comprehensive pain study, results suggest inclusion of established C-fibre, Aδ-fibre mediated and thermal pain measures.

[Drug interactions in pain therapy]. / Arzneimittelinteraktionen in der Schmerztherapie.

BACKGROUND: Pain is one of the most common reasons for consulting a physician. Chronic pain patients often suffer from a variety of comorbidities, such as depression and anxiety and they are therefore often simultaneously treated with more than one drug. The probability of drug interactions increases with every additional drug. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic internet and literature search up to February 2015 was carried out. Systematic lists were included. In addition, the drug prescription information sheets were used and an internet search via Pubmed and google.com was carried out for drugs alone and in combination in order to find substance-specific interactions. RESULTS: A differentiation is made between pharmaceutical, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Pharmaceutical interactions are caused by chemical, physical or physicochemical incompatibility of drugs or adjuvants used. These can even occur outside the body and during concomitant administration via the same route. A pharmacodynamic interaction in pain management is for example the additive sedative effect of opioids and benzodiazepines when taken together. Pharmacokinetic interactions occur during the absorption, distribution, metabolism and in the elimination phases. CONCLUSION: Many drug interactions can be avoided by careful and continuous evaluation of pharmacotherapy and if necessary its adaptation; however, a sound knowledge of the underlying pharmacological mechanisms and the properties of currently used analgesics is necessary.

Cytochrome P450 epoxygenase dependence of opioid analgesia: fluconazole does not interfere with remifentanil-mediated analgesia in human subjects.

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibitors may reduce opioid analgesia by inhibiting CYP activity-dependent post-opioid receptor signaling pathways in the brain. This suggestion was predicated on observations of highly attenuated morphine antinociception in rodents after intracerebroventricular injection of fluconazole or carrying a neuron-specific deletion of the cytochrome P450 reductase. However, based on assessments of thermal and electrical pain tolerance, respiratory function, and side effects in 21 healthy volunteers, before and during steady-state concentrations of 1.5 and 3.0 ng/ml of remifentanil at the effect site (viz., the central nervous system), administration of 400 mg/day fluconazole for 8 days in a double-blind, placebo-controlled manner failed to attenuate opioid effects. Although CYP inhibitors such as fluconazole are unlikely to attenuate remifentanil analgesia in humans, extrapolation of the findings to other opioids is premature because differences among opioid effects, such as ligand-selective biased signaling at opioid receptors, leave the possibility that CYP-dependent opioid signaling in the brain might be limited to morphine and may not extend to remifentanil.

Selective antagonism of opioid-induced ventilatory depression by an ampakine molecule in humans without loss of opioid analgesia.

Ventilatory depression is a significant risk associated with the use of opioids. We assessed whether opioid-induced ventilatory depression can be selectively antagonized by an ampakine without reduction of analgesia. In 16 healthy men, after a single oral dose of 1,500 mg of the ampakine CX717, a target concentration of 100 ng/ml alfentanil decreased the respiratory frequency by only 2.9 +/- 33.4% as compared with 25.6 +/- 27.9% during placebo coadministration (P < 0.01).Blood oxygenation and the ventilatory response to hypercapnic challenge also showed significantly smaller decreases with CX717 than with placebo. In contrast, CX717 did not affect alfentanil-induced analgesia in either electrical or heat-based experimental models of pain. Both ventilatory depression and analgesia were reversed with 1.6 mg of naloxone. These results support the use of ampakines as selective antidotes in humans to counter opioid-induced ventilatory depression without affecting opioid-mediated analgesia.

Differential opioid action on sensory and affective cerebral pain processing.

Low doses of morphine, the most commonly used opioid analgesic, have been shown to significantly reduce the affective but not the sensory intensive dimension of pain. This suggests differential dose-response relationships of opioid analgesia on the sensory and affective components of pain. We investigated the effects of different alfentanil plasma concentration levels (0, 19.6+/-2.7, 47.2+/-7.6, and 76.6+/-11.3 ng/ml) on pain-related brain activation achieved by short pulses of gaseous CO(2) delivered to the nasal mucosa, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) on a 3.0 T MRI scanner in 16 non-carriers and 9 homozygous carriers of the mu-opioid receptor gene variant OPRM1 118A>G. Increasing opioid concentrations had differential effects in brain regions processing the sensory and affective dimensions of pain. In brain regions associated with the processing of the sensory intensity of pain (primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, posterior insular cortex), activation decreased linearly in relation to alfentanil concentrations, which was significantly less pronounced in OPRM1 118G carriers. In contrast, in brain regions known to process the affective dimension of pain (parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, anterior insula), pain-related activation disappeared at the lowest alfentanil dose, without genotype differences.

The partial 5-hydroxytryptamine1A receptor agonist buspirone does not antagonize morphine-induced respiratory depression in humans.

Based on experiments in rats, serotonin receptor 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(1A) agonists have been proposed as a potential therapeutic strategy for the selective treatment of opioid-induced respiratory depression. We investigated the clinical applicability of this principle in healthy volunteers. Twelve subjects received 0.43 mg/kg morphine (30 mg for 70 kg body weight) administered intravenously (i.v.) over approximately 2 h. At the start of the morphine infusion, they received in a randomized, double-blind cross-over design 60 mg p.o. buspirone or placebo. Respiratory depression (hypercapnic challenge) and pain (electrical stimuli: 5 Hz sinus 0-20 mA; chemical stimuli: 200 ms gaseous CO(2) pulses applied to the nasal mucosa) were assessed at baseline, at the end of the morphine infusion, and a third time after antagonizing the opioid effects by i.v. administration of 2 mg naloxone. The linear relationship between the minute ventilation and the CO(2) concentration in the inspired air of 1.07+/-0.27 l/mm Hg CO(2) at baseline conditions became shallower (0.45+/-0.23 l/mm Hg CO(2)) after morphine administration (P<0.001), indicating respiratory depression, which was significantly reversed by naloxone (0.95+/-0.43 l/mm Hg CO(2); P=0.001). Co-administration of buspirone had no effect on morphine-induced respiratory depression (slope 0.45+/-0.23 l/mm Hg CO(2) under morphine plus placebo versus 0.38+/-0.25 l/mm Hg CO(2) under morphine plus buspirone; P=0.7). Significant morphine-induced analgesia was observed in both pain models and was reversed by naloxone but unaffected by buspirone. Buspirone significantly increased the nausea induced by morphine (P=0.011). Oral co-administration of a high dose of the clinically available 5-HT(1A) agonist buspirone cannot be advised as a remedy for opioid-induced respiratory depression. This is indicated by its lack of anti-respiratory depressive effects and by the buspirone-associated increase of morphine-induced nausea.