Disability-adjusted life years from bone and joint infections associated with antimicrobial resistance: an insight from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study.

PURPOSE: Bone and joint infections, complicated by the burgeoning challenge of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), pose significant public health threats by amplifying the disease burden globally. We leveraged results from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) to explore the impact of AMR attributed to bone and joint infections in terms of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), elucidating the contemporary status and temporal trends. METHODS: Utilizing GBD 2019 data, we summarized the burden of bone and joint infections attributed to AMR across 195 countries and territories in the 30 years from 1990 to 2019. We review the epidemiology of AMR in terms of age-standardized rates, the estimated DALYs, comprising years of life lost (YLLs) and years lived with disability (YLDs), as well as associations between DALYs and socio-demographic indices. RESULTS: The GBD revealed that DALYs attributed to bone and joint infections associated with AMR have risen discernibly between 1990 and 2019 globally. Significant geographical disparities and a positive correlation with socio-demographic indicators were observed. Staphylococcus aureus infections, Group A Streptococcus, Group B Streptococcus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter-related bone and joint infections were associated with the highest DALYs because of a high proportion of antimicrobial resistance. Countries with limited access to healthcare, suboptimal sanitary conditions, and inconsistent antibiotic stewardship were markedly impacted. CONCLUSIONS: The GBD underscores the escalating burden of bone and joint infections exacerbated by AMR, necessitating urgent, multi-faceted interventions. Strategies to mitigate the progression and impact of AMR should emphasize prudent antimicrobial usage and robust infection prevention and control measures, coupled with advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.

Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Tribulations: Providing Clinical Evidence for Personalized Surgical Pain Management Care Models.

Proving clinical superiority of personalized care models in interventional and surgical pain management is challenging. The apparent difficulties may arise from the inability to standardize complex surgical procedures that often involve multiple steps. Ensuring the surgery is performed the same way every time is nearly impossible. Confounding factors, such as the variability of the patient population and selection bias regarding comorbidities and anatomical variations are also difficult to control for. Small sample sizes in study groups comparing iterations of a surgical protocol may amplify bias. It is essentially impossible to conceal the surgical treatment from the surgeon and the operating team. Restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria may distort the study population to no longer reflect patients seen in daily practice. Hindsight bias is introduced by the inability to effectively blind patient group allocation, which affects clinical result interpretation, particularly if the outcome is already known to the investigators when the outcome analysis is performed (often a long time after the intervention). Randomization is equally problematic, as many patients want to avoid being randomly assigned to a study group, particularly if they perceive their surgeon to be unsure of which treatment will likely render the best clinical outcome for them. Ethical concerns may also exist if the study involves additional and unnecessary risks. Lastly, surgical trials are costly, especially if the tested interventions are complex and require long-term follow-up to assess their benefit. Traditional clinical testing of personalized surgical pain management treatments may be more challenging because individualized solutions tailored to each patient's pain generator can vary extensively. However, high-grade evidence is needed to prompt a protocol change and break with traditional image-based criteria for treatment. In this article, the authors review issues in surgical trials and offer practical solutions.

Microendoscopic Surgery for Degenerative Disorders of the Cervical and Lumbar Spine: The Influence of the Tubular Workspace on Instrument Angulation, Clinical Outcome, Complications, and Reoperation Rates.

BACKGROUND: Long-term clinical outcomes with microendoscopic spine surgery (MESS) are poorly investigated. The effect of instrument angulation on clinical outcomes has yet to be assessed. METHODS: A total of 229 consecutive patients operated on via two MESS systems were analyzed. Instrument angulation for both MESS systems, which differ from each other regarding the working space for instruments, was assessed using a computer model. Patients' charts and endoscopic video recordings were reviewed to determine clinical outcomes, complications, and revision surgery rates. At a minimum follow-up of two years, clinical outcomes were assessed employing the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: A total of 52 posterior cervical foraminotomies (PCF) and 177 lumbar decompression procedures were performed. The mean follow-up was six years (range 2-9 years). At the final follow-up, 69% of cervical and 76% of lumbar patients had no radicular pain. The mean NDI was 10%, and the mean ODI was 12%. PCF resulted in excellent clinical outcomes in 80% of cases and 87% of lumbar procedures. Recurrent disc herniations occurred in 7.7% of patients. The surgical time and repeated procedure rate were significantly lower for the MESS system with increased working space, whereas the clinical outcome and rate of complication were similar. CONCLUSIONS: MESS achieves high success rates for treating degenerative spinal disorders in the long term. Increased instrument angulation improves access to the compressive pathology and lowers the surgical time and repeated procedure rate.

The Changing Environment in Postgraduate Education in Orthopedic Surgery and Neurosurgery and Its Impact on Technology-Driven Targeted Interventional and Surgical Pain Management: Perspectives from Europe, Latin America, Asia, and The United States.

Personalized care models are dominating modern medicine. These models are rooted in teaching future physicians the skill set to keep up with innovation. In orthopedic surgery and neurosurgery, education is increasingly influenced by augmented reality, simulation, navigation, robotics, and in some cases, artificial intelligence. The postpandemic learning environment has also changed, emphasizing online learning and skill- and competency-based teaching models incorporating clinical and bench-top research. Attempts to improve work-life balance and minimize physician burnout have led to work-hour restrictions in postgraduate training programs. These restrictions have made it particularly challenging for orthopedic and neurosurgery residents to acquire the knowledge and skill set to meet the requirements for certification. The fast-paced flow of information and the rapid implementation of innovation require higher efficiencies in the modern postgraduate training environment. However, what is taught typically lags several years behind. Examples include minimally invasive tissue-sparing techniques through tubular small-bladed retractor systems, robotic and navigation, endoscopic, patient-specific implants made possible by advances in imaging technology and 3D printing, and regenerative strategies. Currently, the traditional roles of mentee and mentor are being redefined. The future orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons involved in personalized surgical pain management will need to be versed in several disciplines ranging from bioengineering, basic research, computer, social and health sciences, clinical study, trial design, public health policy development, and economic accountability. Solutions to the fast-paced innovation cycle in orthopedic surgery and neurosurgery include adaptive learning skills to seize opportunities for innovation with execution and implementation by facilitating translational research and clinical program development across traditional boundaries between clinical and nonclinical specialties. Preparing the future generation of surgeons to have the aptitude to keep up with the rapid technological advances is challenging for postgraduate residency programs and accreditation agencies. However, implementing clinical protocol change when the entrepreneur-investigator surgeon substantiates it with high-grade clinical evidence is at the heart of personalized surgical pain management.

Matrix Metalloproteinases in Cardioembolic Stroke: From Background to Complications.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are endopeptidases participating in physiological processes of the brain, maintaining the blood-brain barrier integrity and playing a critical role in cerebral ischemia. In the acute phase of stroke activity, the expression of MMPs increase and is associated with adverse effects, but in the post-stroke phase, MMPs contribute to the process of healing by remodeling tissue lesions. The imbalance between MMPs and their inhibitors results in excessive fibrosis associated with the enhanced risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), which is the main cause of cardioembolic strokes. MMPs activity disturbances were observed in the development of hypertension, diabetes, heart failure and vascular disease enclosed in CHA2DS2VASc score, the scale commonly used to evaluate the risk of thromboembolic complications risk in AF patients. MMPs involved in hemorrhagic complications of stroke and activated by reperfusion therapy may also worsen the stroke outcome. In the present review, we briefly summarize the role of MMPs in the ischemic stroke with particular consideration of the cardioembolic stroke and its complications. Moreover, we discuss the genetic background, regulation pathways, clinical risk factors and impact of MMPs on the clinical outcome.

Long-term follow-up MRI shows no hastening of adjacent segment degeneration following cervical disc arthroplasty.

Cervical disc arthroplasty is an established procedure, but studies with data on long-term clinical outcome, reoperation for symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (sASD), and degenerative changes based on MRI findings are rare. Thus, a file review was performed and patients with complete documentation of neurological status at preoperative, postoperative, 12 month, 3-4 years follow-up including surgical reports for reoperation with a minimum follow-up of 9 years were included. Final follow-up assessment included a physical examination, assessment of pain levels, Odoms criteria, Neck disability index. The degeneration of each cervical segment at preoperative and at final follow-up was assessed using an MRI. Forty-six out of 68 included patients participated, the mean follow-up was 11 (range 9-15) years, at which 71.7% of patients were free of arm pain, 52.2% of patients were free of neck pain, 63% of patients had no sensory dysfunction, and full motor strength was noted in 95.6% of patients. The clinical success rate was 76.1%, the mean NDI was 12%. Overall repeated procedure rate was 17%, the reoperation rate for sASD was 9%, and removal of CDA was performed in 4%. MRI showed progressive degeneration but no significant changes of SDI from preoperative to final follow-up.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a dynamic translational plating versus a rigid carbon fiber reinforced PEEK plating system - a comparison study of radiographic parameters.

PURPOSE: In this study the authors compare the radiographic findings of patients undergoing 1-3 level ACDF a rigid CFRP plate and a translational titanium plate system with a focus on radiographic alignment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review 70 consecutive patients undergoing a 1 to 3 level ACDF for cervical spondylosis was conducted. 2 groups depending on the cervical plating system were created including 38 patients in group 1 (dynamic plate) and 32 in group 2 (rigid CFRP plate). Plain neutral radiographs preoperatively, immediately after surgery and at most recent follow-up were used to assess parameters on sagittal alignment, fusion height, adjacent segment ossification (ASO), fusion rate and implant failure. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups preoperatively. Both groups had a more than 12 months follow-up (p = 0.327). Improvement of C2-7 lordosis was seen in both groups but only in group 1 it reached statistical significance at final follow-up. Significant improvement in sagittal segmental alignment was noted in both groups following surgery. A significant sagittal correction of 5.5 ± 9.1 degrees (p = 0.002) was maintained through follow-up only in group 2. No significantly different was seen for segmental fusion rates and loss of fusion height. There were no instances of implant failure within both groups. Worsening of ASO was 20% for both groups. CONCLUSION: ACDF allows for correction and maintenance of cervical alignment. Rigid rigid plate appears more effective at maintaining segmental lordotic correction. The fusion rate and implant failure was not different for both groups.

Fluorescence image-guided resection of intracranial meningioma: an experimental in vivo study on nude mice.

INTRODUCTION: The use of photodynamic agents in malignant cranial tumor surgery is quite common. For example five-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-induced porphyrins in malignant gliomas are potent photosensitizers. Until today there is no comparable selective fluorescent substance available for meningiomas. Nevertheless, there is a demand for intraoperative fluorescent identification of e.g. invasive skull base meningiomas to increase radicality. This study was established to investigate fluorescent image-guided resection with somatostatin receptor labelled fluorescence dye for intracranial meningioma in the nude mice. METHODS: Primary meningioma cell culture samples were stereotactically implanted subdural into 20 nude mice. 90 days after inoculation of the cells, a cranial MRI with contrast agent revealed tumor growth. After detection of tumor mass in MRI, FAM-TOC5,6-Carboxyfluoresceine-Tyr3-Octreotide was injected intravenously and tumor mass was hereafter resected under visualization via fluorescence microscope and endoscope. After attempted total resection, animal were sacrificed brain slices were obtained and histologically analysed to verify the resection extent. RESULTS: In 18 mice tumor growth was detected in MRI after 90 days of inoculation. The tumor mass could be clearly identified with fluorescence microscope and endoscope after injecting FAM-TOC5,6-Carboxyfluoresceine-Tyr3-Octreotide. The tumor margins could be better visualized. After fluorescence-guided resection no remaining tumor could be identified in histological analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes for the first time the use of FAM-TOC5,6-Carboxyfluoresceine-Tyr3-Octreotide and demonstrates its value of fluorescent identification of meningioma cells in vivo. Furthermore, the authors established a new experimental animal model for fluorescence meningioma surgery.

The Surgical Treatment of Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis using Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyether Ether Ketone Implants: Personal Experience of a Series of 81 Consecutive Patients.

BACKGROUND: Pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PSD) is a complex disorder that often required postoperative imaging. Carbon-fiber-reinforced polyether ether ketone (CFRP) is radiolucent and offers an optimal assessability of anatomic structures. METHODS: A retrospective file review of patients who were operated on for PSD using CFRP implants was performed to assess the clinical outcome, implant-associated complications, and revision surgery. A minimum follow-up of 3 months was required for evaluation of clinical and radiographic data, which included computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment, to determine implant stability and assessability of soft tissue and nerve structures using a grading system. RESULTS: Eighty-one consecutive patients with a mean of 69.5 years were identified. Debridement and stabilization were performed in 8 cervical, 17 thoracic, and 57 lumbar procedures; 72 interbody fusion procedures using cages were performed. Intraoperatively, no implant-associated complication was noted. The mean follow-up was 7 months, at which 52 patients attended. Improved mobility and reduced pain levels were reported by 87%, and MRI assessability was graded ideal. Residual sign of infection was seen in 5 cases, which influenced antibiotic therapy. Asymptomatic radiolucent zones were identified in 13 patients (16%) and screw loosening in 2 (2.4%). In 1 patient, the pedicle screw tip broke and remained within the vertebral body. A repeated procedure because of progressive vertebral body destruction, implant loosening, or subsidence was performed in 5 patients (6.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The surgical treatment of PSD using CFRP is safe. The repeat procedure rate as a result of implant loosening is 6.1%. Minimal artifacts offer ideal assessability of soft tissue structures on an MRI.

Is Decompression and Partial Discectomy Advantageous Over Decompression Alone in Microendoscopic Decompression Of Monosegmental Unilateral Lumbar Recess Stenosis?

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic techniques are well accepted as surgical technique for decompression of lumbar lateral recess stenosis (LRS). It is uncertain if there is a difference in clinical outcome for decompression alone (DA) or decompression with partial discectomy (DPD) for the treatment of LRS. METHODS: All files of patients who underwent an endoscopic procedure for lumbar LRS were identified from a prospectively collected database. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic video were analyzed with special focus on the technique of nerve root decompression. Clinical outcome was assessed via a personal examination, a standardized questionnaire including the numeric rating scale (NRS) for leg and back pain, the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria to assess functional outcome and clinical success. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were identified of which 57 attended for evaluation (86.4%). DA was performed in 15 (26.3%) patients and DPD in 42 patients (73.7%). The mean follow-up was 45.0 months (range: 16-82 months). Fifty-two patients reported to be free of leg pain (91.1%), 42 patients had no noticeable back pain (73.7%), 49 patients had full muscle strength (85.9%), and 48 patients had no sensory disturbance (84.2%). The mean NRS for leg pain was 1, the mean NRS for back pain was 2, mean ODI was 16% (range: 0%-60%). Clinical success was noted in 49 patients (85.9%) and it was significantly higher for patients following DPD (P = .024). The overall repeat procedure rate was 12% with reoperation rate at the index segment in 10.5% of cases. There were no significant differences with respect to leg and back pain, ODI, and reoperation between both groups. CONCLUSION: Microendoscopic DPD of LRS achieves a 92% clinical success rate which is significantly higher compared to 67% clinical success achieved by DA. There was no significant difference for the rate of reoperation, leg and back pain, and ODI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Annular closure device breakage due to recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a case report.

Detailed surgical management, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computer tomography (CT) images of a broken annular closure device (ACD) have not been reported yet. In this case, a 28-year-old male presented with a new onset of radiculopathy three years after lumbar discectomy and placement of an ACD. The CT-myelography and MRI revealed a recurrent disc herniation (RDH) and dislocation of a broken ACD. ACD removal was performed and confirmed breakage due to RDH with scarring around the RDH and displaced ACD. Implant-associated complications and management should be reported in detail in order to enhance knowledge on device-related complications.

3D-exoscopic visualization using the VITOM-3D in cranial and spinal neurosurgery. What are the limitations?

OBJECTIVE: 3D exoscopic visualization in neurosurgical procedures is of interest for several reasons. The VITOM-3D exoscopic system is cheaper compared to the operating microscope (OM) and offers each person involved in the procedure the same image of the operative field. Little is known of limitations of this visualization technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospectively, a consecutive series 34 procedures were assessed with focus on the following aspects: intraoperative limitation and the cause for a switch to the OM or endoscopy. A standardized questionnaire was answered by each individual involved in the procedure to assess the image quality, illumination, and magnification of the operative field. Intraoperative video recording and pre- and postoperative MRI and CT-scan were analyzed to assess the dimensions of the surgical approach. RESULTS: Sixteen cranial and 18 spinal procedures (10 intra-axial, 6 extra-axial, 6 cervical, and 12 lumbar) were performed by seven neurosurgical attendings, twelve residents and twelve scrub nurses who all completed a standardized questionnaire after each procedure. Handling and identification of anatomical structures was rated equal or superior to the OM in 62 % and over 80 % of cases, respectively. The illumination and magnification of the operative field on the surface was rate in equal od superior in all cases and on the depth it was rated inferior to the OM over 60 % of cases. In one spinal and five cranial procedures a switch to the OM or endoscope were performed for the following reasons: poor illumination (4 cases), tissue identification (1 case), need for fluorescence imaging (1 case). CONCLUSION: 3D exoscopic visualization using the VITOM-3D is best suited for spinal procedures and for extra-axial cranial procedures. In case of small approach dimensions, the illumination and magnification of the depth of the operative field is rated inferior to the OM which resulted in difficulty of tissue identification and a switch to the OM.

Adjacent segment disease following anterior cervical fusion and the presence of surgery for lumbar disc herniation and surgery at the musculoskeletal joints: are they related?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: A potential correlation between surgery for symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (sASD) and the development of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine or osteoarthritis of the musculoskeletal joints remains to be determined. PURPOSE: To assess the rate of sASD following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), the rate of lumbar discectomy (LD), and rate of surgery performed for osteoarthritis at the joints of the musculoskeletal in a long term follow-up. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cohort study OUTCOME MEASURES: Repeat procedure for sASD, microsurgical LD (MSD), and/or the musculoskeletal joints (shoulder, knee, hip). PATIENT SAMPLE: Retrospectively, a total of 833 consecutive patients who underwent ACDF for degenerative disorders ≥20 years ago were identified. Charts were reviewed for preoperative neurological status, smoking status, physical labor, and repeat procedures. Missing data lead to exclusion from follow-up assessment. METHODS: At final follow-up the need for pain medication, Neck disability index (NDI), and Odoms criteria were evaluated. An MRI was performed to assess the grade of degeneration of the cervical spine via the segmental degeneration index (SDI). Patients without (group 1) and with (group 2) repeat procedure for sASD were compared. RESULTS: Collectively, 313 patients met inclusion criteria and 136 patients were evaluated. The mean follow-up was 26 years. Clinical success rate according to Odoms was 85.3%, mean NDI was 14.4%, the rate of regular intake of pain medication was 14.7%, the rate of repeated procedure for sASD was 10.3%. MSD was performed in 23.5%, surgery for osteoarthritis of the shoulder, the hip, and the knee were performed in 11.8%, 6.9%, and 27.7%, respectively. The rate of MSD (p=.018) was significantly higher in group 2 compared to group 1. Gender, smoking status, surgery of the musculoskeletal joints, and the grade of degeneration of the cranial and caudal adjacent segments were similar between group 1 and group 2. CONCLUSION: The overall clinical success following ACDF was 85.3%. The rate of repeat procedure for sASD was 10.3% within 26 years. Patients with sASD had a significantly higher rate of MSD and poorer clinical outcome compared to patients without sASD.

Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

In the 1940s, the posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) was first described. At that time, this technique represented a big step ahead for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Rightly, a multitude of studies demonstrated that open microsurgical posterior foraminotomy is an effective treatment for cervical radiculopathy. Open posterior approaches have still the disadvantage of detaching the extensor cervical muscles from the laminae and the spinous processes, which can lead to severe collateral tissue and muscle damage, followed by postoperative complications, such as axial neck pain, shoulder pain, loss of lordosis, or even spinal instability. Minimally invasive techniques have been developed to reduce the approach related trauma. Initially, these techniques have been performed using endoscopic visualization and applied to the lumbar spine with great success. With this in mind, spine surgeons have extended the spectrum of indication and applied endoscopic techniques to treat degenerative cervical spine disorders. Indications for PCF are single-level or multilevel unilateral lateral disc herniation, osseous foraminal stenosis secondary to isolated facet hypertrophy, and persistent radicular symptoms following an anterior cervical spine procedure. Depending on the underlying pathology, clinical success rates from 75% to 96% for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy have been reported. Mainly, there are 2 different endoscopic techniques to perform PCF. The so-called full-endoscopic techniques are performed under continuous irrigation in single-handed technique. The endoscopic tubular assisted technique is performed in bimanual fashion with microsurgical instruments. The purpose of this video is to describe the endoscopic tubular assisted technique in detail. Patient consent was obtained prior to preparation of the video.

Is there a difference in the grade of degeneration at the cervical spine following anterior cervical fusion with respect to clinical outcome, diagnosis, and repeat procedure? An MRI study of 102 patients with a mean follow-up of 25 years.

OBJECTIVE: There is currently no consensus on whether adjacent-segment degeneration (ASD), loss of disc height (DH), and loss of sagittal segmental angle (SSA) are due to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The purpose of the present study was to assess the grade of segmental degeneration after ACDF and to analyze if there is a difference with respect to clinical outcome, diagnosis, and number of operated levels. METHODS: A total of 102 patients who underwent ACDF with a minimum follow-up of 18 years were retrospectively identified. At final follow-up, the clinical outcome according to Odom's criteria, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and reoperation for symptomatic ASD (sASD) was assessed. MRI was performed, and DH, SSA, and the segmental degeneration index (SDI, a 5-step grading system that includes disc signal intensity, anterior and posterior disc protrusion, narrowing of the disc space, and foraminal stenosis) were assessed for evaluation of the 2 adjacent and 4 adjoining segments to the ACDF. MRI findings were compared with respect to clinical outcome (NDI: 0%-20% vs > 20%; Odom's criteria: success vs no success), reoperation for sASD, initial diagnosis (cervical disc herniation [CDH] vs cervical spondylotic myelopathy [CSM] and spondylosis), and the number of operated levels (1 vs 2-4 levels). RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 25 years (range 18-45 years), and the diagnosis was CDH in 74.5% of patients and CSM/spondylosis in 25.5%. At follow-up, the mean NDI was 12.4% (range 0%-36%), the clinical success rate was 87.3%, and the reoperation rate for sASD was 15.7%. For SDI, no significant differences were seen with respect to NDI, Odom's criteria, and sASD. Patients diagnosed with CDH had significantly more degeneration at the adjacent segments (cranial, p = 0.015; caudal, p = 0.017). Patients with a 2- to 4-level procedure had less degeneration at the caudal adjacent (p = 0.011) and proximal adjoining (p = 0.019) segments. Aside from a significantly lower DH at the proximal cranial adjoining segment in cases of CSM/spondylosis and without clinical success, no further differences were noted. The degree of SSA was not significantly different with respect to clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were seen in the SDI grade and SSA with respect to clinical outcome. The SDI is higher after single-level ACDF and with the diagnosis of CDH. The DH was negligibly different with respect to clinical outcome, diagnosis, and number of operated levels.