Influence of stimulus presentation rate on intraoperative ECAP thresholds in cochlear implant users.

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to evaluate the influence of the presentation rate on intraoperative ECAP thresholds in cochlear implant users. DESIGN: The design was data on the ECAP thresholds (t-NRT) as well as the behavioural T- and C-levels have been collected in CI patients of a quaternary otologic referral centre. Measurements of the tNRT thresholds were performed intraoperatively for 250 Hz and 80 Hz presentation rates and correlated to the stabilised T- and C-levels measured at the 5th fitting session, 4-6 months after surgery. STUDY SAMPLE: There was a study sample of 35 consecutive CI patients. All patients were users of the Nucleus 24RECA (Freedom) or Nucleus CI512 cochlear implants with the Contour Advance-of-Stylet electrode. RESULTS: The result showed that the t-NRT thresholds were higher for the 250 Hz pulse rate typically used during the intraoperative stimulation under general anaesthesia than for the 80 Hz rate used typically during the postoperative fitting sessions. This difference was more pronounced for the basal electrodes where it exceeded 10 current levels (CL). Pearson's correlation coefficients between the t-NRT-measurements and the stabilised T- and C-levels r ranged between 0.34 and 0.47. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the magnitude of the ECAP thresholds (t-NRT) recorded intraoperatively depends significantly on the stimulus presentation rate.

Postimplantation changes of electrophysiological parameters in patients with cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the postoperative changes of the basic electrophysiological and psychophysical parameters in cochlear implant (CI) patients: the impedance of the electrode contacts, the electrically-evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds and the T/C levels. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective case review in a quaternary otologic referral centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on the impedance of the electrode contacts, the ECAP thresholds and the T/C levels were collected in 20 consecutive CI patients divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 10 prelingually deaf children implanted before the age of 18 months, and group 2 comprised 10 postlingually deaf adults (average age of 58 years). All patients were users of the Nucleus 24RECA (Freedom, Contour advance off-stylet electrode) CI. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: (1) The mid-portion and the apical electrodes showed a decrease in the impedance values between the 1st and the 6th postoperative months and stabilization in the later course. Impedance of the most basal electrodes grew during the first postoperative months and stabilized later on, but remained higher than the impedance of the mid-portion and the apical electrodes. (2) The neural response telemetry threshold values tended to decrease within the first 3 months after surgery to reach a plateau afterwards. (3) The behavioural threshold levels remained generally stable, except for the basal electrodes where a decrease could be observed. The hearing comfort levels showed an increase during the first 6 months of the implant use and remained stable afterwards.

Headbands, testbands and softbands in preoperative testing and application of bone-anchored devices in adults and children.

The headbands, the testbands and the softbands are applied for coupling of the sound processors of the bone-anchored devices to the patient's head before the titanium fixture/abutment can be implanted. The bands are used for acute and/or prolonged testing of the bone-anchored devices, and are able to approximate the results of postoperative amplification. Yet, whatever the type of the band coupling, the transducers interface with the bone through a layer of skin and subcutaneous tissue that damp the transmission and decrease effective amplification. Therefore, the final hearing result with the bone-anchored device after implantation is usually better than with the sound processor attached to the headband, testband or softband, especially in the high-frequency zone. The results of our studies performed in experienced Baha Compact users quantified the magnitude of the skin damping and showed significant threshold differences for frequencies 1-4 kHz (in the range of 5-20 dB) when the Baha was coupled to the implanted fixture/abutment, as compared to the headband or the testband. These differences were also reflected in speech audiometry with the speech reception threshold improvement of approximately 4-7 dB. Suboptimal character of audiometric thresholds and speech understanding scores found during the preoperative testing period must be carefully considered in patient counseling, because such suboptimal results obtained preoperatively could demotivate the patients from using the Baha. Audiometrical results obtained with the headband and the testband are comparable; therefore, the more comfortable headband is also suitable for the preoperative audiological evaluation, especially in children.

Effect of changing pulse rate on profile parameters of perceptual thresholds and loudness comfort levels and relation to ECAP thresholds in recipients of the Nucleus CI24RE device.

The Nucleus CI24RE 'Freedom' device offers higher stimulation rates and lower noise levels in action potential measurements (ECAPs) than previous devices. A study including ten European implant teams showed that the effect of changes in rate from 250 to 3500 pulses per second on tilt and curvature of the T and C profiles is insignificant. When changing rate one may change the levels at all electrodes by the same amount. Using an automated procedure ECAPs could be measured quickly and reliably at a noise level of only 1 microV, this did not result in improved correlations between the tilt and curvature parameters of the ECAP profiles and those of the T and C profiles. Average C levels appear to differ markedly among implant centers; a better assessment protocol is required. When increasing stimulus rate one should take into account that this requires higher pulse charges per second and more power consumption.

Comparison of the audiologic results obtained with the bone-anchored hearing aid attached to the headband, the testband, and to the "snap" abutment.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To quantify the audiometric differences between the preoperative tests with the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid (BAHA) attached to the headband or the testband and the final postoperative result with the BAHA positioned at the implanted abutment. 2) To compare the results obtained with the headband and the testband. 3) To quantify the magnitude of the damping through the skin for the BAHA placed at the testband (important for comparison with the implantable hearing aids). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: Tertiary otological referral centre. PATIENTS: Ten adult (> or = 14 yr old) BAHA patients (6 male and 4 female subjects) with bilateral air-bone gaps of minimum 40-dB hearing loss and with more than 6 months of BAHA experience with the BAHA "Compact." METHODS: Audiometric free-field thresholds and speech audiometry scores (Consonant-Vowel-Consonant lists, phonemic score) have been evaluated for 3 conditions: BAHA attached to the implanted "Snap" abutment, to the headband, or to the testband. RESULTS: For frequencies 1 to 4 kHz, significant differences in the range of 5 to 20 dB were found between the BAHA coupled with the Snap abutment and the preoperative testing conditions with the BAHA positioned at the headband or the testband. These differences were also reflected in the speech audiometry with a difference in speech reception threshold of approximately 4 to 7 dB. CONCLUSION: 1) Significant differences in the audiometric thresholds and the speech understanding scores were found between the preoperative test conditions and the final postoperative result. 2) Audiometric results obtained with the headband and the testband are comparable; therefore, the more comfortable headband is also suitable for the preoperative audiologic evaluation. 3) The magnitude of the skin damping must be accounted for when referring to the audiometric results obtained with the BAHA attached to the testband or headband.