Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Orthop Traumatol ; 9(1): 11-5, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19384475

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hereditary multiple exostoses (HME) is a genetic disorder that causes limb deformities due to disturbance at the growth plates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six adolescents, whith symptomatic valgus deformity at the ankle and knee (seven affected legs) underwent correction procedures using the Ilizarov apparatus. In 5 legs, a bifocal Ilizarov apparatus was used, whereas in 2 legs the use of a monofocal apparatus was sufficient. RESULTS: Correction of the mechanical axis was achieved in all cases, and limb length discrepancy was equalized in the 3 cases that underwent limb elogation. The average knee and ankle corrections were 15 degrees and 18 degrees , respectively. The average time from application to removal of the Ilizarove apparatus was 4.6 months. No major complication occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Ilizarov method in adolescents with HME enables successful simultaneous correction of multiplanar, multifocal complex limb deformities.

2.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 99(3): 686-91, 1997 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9047187

ABSTRACT

Immediate breast reconstruction with the tissue expander is now established as an accepted procedure after mastectomy, and large series have been published concerning the technique and its complications. Unfortunately, only scarce information is available regarding the long-term aesthetic results and patient satisfaction achieved by immediate reconstruction using tissue expansion. In this study, we reviewed 52 patients who had undergone immediate breast reconstruction using the tissue expander with a follow-up of at least 1 year after completion of the reconstruction. We developed an objective assessment of patient satisfaction, aesthetic results, and the factors affecting them. The results show remarkable concordance of assessment by patient, surgeon, and independent observer: All gave good scores for aesthetic appearance (6.4 to 7.4 on a scale of 1 to 10). A total of 92.3 percent of patients rated their satisfaction as good to excellent. Symmetry was the main parameter influencing the patients' score, while the surgeon's score also was affected by the quality of the inframammary fold and capsular contracture. Breast size, chemotherapy, complications, time interval, and additional procedures had no relation to either scoring or patient satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Mammaplasty , Tissue Expansion , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Esthetics , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Mammaplasty/methods , Mammaplasty/standards , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...