Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Int Q Community Health Educ ; 11(2): 155-63, 1990 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20840946

ABSTRACT

Conducting research projects that are related to illness prevention in developing countries is complex and challenging. In this article we discuss those areas common to health programs which pose potential problems to researchers; especially those foreign to the community in which a research project is taking place. Results from past experiences have indicated that failure to involve community members and indigenous research workers can lead to mistrust, misconceptions, and self-protection. Also, whenever villagers feel that the information they give may be used against them, they may be forced to alter or conceal true data. Health investigators and granting agencies must be prepared to acquaint themselves with problems related to communication, transportation, weather, and how local governments function officially and unofficially so as to guard against unrealistic assumptions and expectations. It has also been noted that students from developing countries are often faced with the double dilemma of attempting to ride the roller coaster between two cultures; and in essence, be a part of both when working on research projects with their professors from developed countries.

4.
Int Q Community Health Educ ; 9(1): 35-50, 1988 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20841199

ABSTRACT

This study determined the effect of a health education program on malaria disease control among the citizens of Nkanu-local government area, a community in Nigeria. Participants consisted of subjects that used the Nkanu community hospital for their health care. Initially, 300 subjects were randomly selected for the study (150 experimental and 150 control) from Ama-nkanu village, but only 202 subjects completed the study. Results of the pre- and posttest on field tests and that of posttest on knowledge acquisition demonstrated significant differences between the two groups on knowledge and environmental improvements. The treatment group performed better than the control group on the knowledge test. On the environmental tests, the experimental group also demonstrated noticeable changes (improvements) when compared to the control group.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...