Durable Approaches to Recurrent Rectal Prolapse Repair May Require Avoidance of Index Procedure.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse is associated with unique technical challenges, partially determined by the surgical approach used for the index operation. Success rates are variable, and data to determine the best approach in patients with recurring prolapse are lacking. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess current surgical approaches to patients with prior rectal prolapse repairs and to compare short-term outcomes of de novo and redo procedures, including recurrence of rectal prolapse. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database. SETTINGS: The Multicenter Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium Prospective Quality Improvement database. De-identified surgeons at more than 25 sites (81% high volume) self-reported patient demographics, prior repairs, symptoms of incontinence and obstructed defecation, and operative details, including history of concomitant repairs and prior prolapse repairs. PATIENTS: Patients who were offered surgery for full thickness rectal prolapse. INTERVENTIONS: Incidence and type of repair used for prior rectal prolapse surgery were recorded. Primary and secondary outcomes of index and redo operations were calculated. Patients undergoing rectal prolapse re-repair (redo) were compared with patients undergoing first (de novo) rectal prolapse repair. The incidence of rectal prolapse recurrence in de novo and redo operations was quantified. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of rectal prolapse recurrence in de novo and redo settings. RESULTS: Eighty-nine (19.3%) of 461 patients underwent redo rectal prolapse repair. On short-term follow-up, redo patients had prolapse recurrence rates similar to those undergoing de novo repair. However, patients undergoing redo procedures rarely had the same operation as their index procedure. LIMITATIONS: Self-reported, de-identified data. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that recurrent rectal prolapse surgery is feasible and can offer adequate rates of rectal prolapse durability in the short term but may argue for a change in surgical approach for redo procedures when clinically feasible. See Video Abstract . LOS ENFOQUES DURADEROS PARA LA REPARACIN DEL PROLAPSO RECTAL RECURRENTE PUEDEN REQUERIR EVITAR EL PROCEDIMIENTO NDICE: ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso rectal recurrente se asocia con desafíos técnicos únicos, determinados en parte por el abordaje quirúrgico utilizado para la operación inicial. Las tasas de éxito son variables y faltan datos para determinar el mejor abordaje en pacientes con prolapso recurrente.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los enfoques quirúrgicos actuales para pacientes con reparaciones previas de prolapso rectal y comparar los resultados a corto plazo de los procedimientos de novo y rehacer, incluida la recurrencia del prolapso rectal.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos prospectiva.AJUSTE:Base de datos de mejora prospectiva de la calidad del Consorcio multicéntrico de trastornos del suelo pélvico. Cirujanos no identificados en más de 25 sitios (81% de alto volumen) informaron datos demográficos de los pacientes, reparaciones previas, síntomas de incontinencia y defecación obstruida y detalles operativos, incluido el historial de reparaciones concomitantes y reparaciones previas de prolapso.INTERVENCIONES:Se registro la incidencia y el tipo de reparación utilizada para la cirugía de prolapso rectal previa. Se calcularon los resultados primarios y secundarios de las operaciones de índice y reoperacion. Se compararon los pacientes sometidos a una nueva reparación (reoperacion) de prolapso rectal con pacientes sometidos a una primera reparación (de novo) de prolapso rectal. Se cuantificó la incidencia de recurrencia del prolapso rectal en operaciones de novo y rehacer.RESULTADOS:El resultado primario de recurrencia del prolapso rectal en entornos de novo y redo. Ochenta y nueve (19,3%) de 461 pacientes se sometieron a una nueva reparación del prolapso rectal. En el seguimiento a corto plazo, los pacientes reoperados tuvieron tasas de recurrencia de prolapso similares a los de los sometidos a reparación de novo. Sin embargo, los pacientes sometidos a procedimientos de rehacer rara vez tuvieron la misma operación que su procedimiento índice.LIMITACIONES:Datos no identificados y autoinformados.CONCLUSIONES/DISCUSIÓN:Nuestros resultados sugieren que la cirugía de prolapso rectal recurrente es factible y puede ofrecer tasas adecuadas de durabilidad del prolapso rectal en el corto plazo, pero puede abogar por un cambio en el enfoque quirúrgico para rehacer los procedimientos cuando sea clínicamente factible. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban as Extended Prophylaxis Reduces Postdischarge Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Malignancy and IBD.

BACKGROUND: Despite guidelines suggesting the use of extended prophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with colorectal cancer and perhaps IBD, routine use is low and scant data exist regarding oral forms of therapy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to compare the incidence of postdischarge venous thromboembolism in patients given extended prophylaxis with low-dose rivaroxaban. DESIGN: We used propensity matching to compare pre- and postintervention analyses from a 2-year period before instituting extended prophylaxis. SETTING: All colorectal patients at a single institution were prospectively considered for extended prophylaxis. PATIENTS: Patients with a diagnosis of IBD or colorectal cancer who underwent operative resection were included. INTERVENTIONS: Those considered for extended prophylaxis were prescribed 10 mg of rivaroxaban for 30 days postsurgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was venous thromboembolism incidence 30 days postdischarge. The secondary outcome was bleeding rates, major or minor. RESULTS: Of the 498 patients considered for extended prophylaxis, 363 were discharged with rivaroxaban, 81 on baseline anticoagulation, and 54 without anticoagulation. Propensity-matched cohorts based on stoma creation, operative approach, procedure type, and BMI were made to 174 historical controls. After excluding cases of inpatient venous thromboembolism, postoperative rates were lower in the prospective cohort (4.8% vs 0.6%, p = 0.019). In the prospective group, 36 episodes of bleeding occurred, 26 (7.2%) were discharged with rivaroxaban, 8 (9.9%) discharged on other anticoagulants, and 2 (3.7%) with no postoperative anticoagulation. Cases of major bleeding were 1.1% (4/363) in the rivaroxaban group, and each required intervention. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited to a single institution and did not include a placebo arm. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with IBD and colorectal cancer, extended prophylaxis with low-dose rivaroxaban led to a significant decrease in postdischarge thromboembolic events with a low bleeding risk profile. See Video Abstract . RIVAROXABN EN DOSIS BAJAS COMO PROFILAXIS PROLONGADA REDUCE LA TROMBOEMBOLIA VENOSA POSTERIOR AL ALTA, EN PACIENTES CON NEOPLASIAS MALIGNAS Y ENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA INTESTINAL: ANTECEDENTES:A pesar de las normas que sugieren el uso de profilaxis extendida para la prevención del tromboembolismo venoso en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal y tal vez enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, el uso rutinario es bajo y existen escasos datos sobre las formas orales de terapia.OBJETIVO:Comparar la incidencia de tromboembolismo venoso posterior al alta, en pacientes que recibieron profilaxis prolongada con dosis bajas de rivaroxabán.DISEÑO:Utilizamos el emparejamiento de propensión para comparar un análisis previo y posterior a la intervención de un período de 2 años antes de instituir la profilaxis extendida.AJUSTE:Todos los pacientes colorrectales en una sola institución fueron considerados prospectivamente para profilaxis extendida.PACIENTES:Incluidos pacientes con diagnóstico de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal o cáncer colorrectal sometidos a resección quirúrgica.INTERVENCIONES:A los considerados para profilaxis extendida se les prescribió 10 mg de rivaroxabán durante 30 días postoperatorios.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la incidencia de tromboembolismo venoso 30 días después del alta. El resultado secundario fueron las tasas de hemorragia, mayor o menor.RESULTADOS:De los 498 pacientes considerados para profilaxis extendida, 363 fueron dados de alta con rivaroxabán, 81 con anticoagulación inicial y 54 sin anticoagulación. Se realizaron cohortes emparejadas por propensión basadas en la creación de la estoma, abordaje quirúrgico, tipo de procedimiento y el índice de masa corporal en 174 controles históricos. Después de excluir los casos de tromboembolismo venoso hospitalizado, las tasas posoperatorias fueron más bajas en la cohorte prospectiva (4,8% frente a 0,6%, p = 0,019). En el grupo prospectivo ocurrieron 36 episodios de hemorragia, 26 (7,2%) fueron dados de alta con rivaroxaban, 8 (9,9%) fueron dados de alta con otros anticoagulantes y 2 (3,7%) sin anticoagulación posoperatoria. Los casos de hemorragia mayor fueron del 1,1% (4/363) en el grupo de rivaroxabán y cada uno requirió intervención.LIMITACIONES:Limitado a una sola institución y no incluyó un grupo de placebo.CONCLUSIONES:Entre los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y cáncer colorrectal, la profilaxis extendida con dosis bajas de rivaroxabán condujo a una disminución significativa de los eventos tromboembólicos posteriores al alta, con un perfil de riesgo de hemorragia bajo. (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy).

The international variability of surgery for rectal prolapse.

Objective: There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal approach for patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse. The aim of this international survey was to assess the patterns in treatment of rectal prolapse. Design: A 23-question survey was distributed to the Pelvic Floor Consortium of the American Society of Colorectal Surgeons, the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand, and the Pelvic Floor Society. Questions pertained to surgeon and practice demographics, preoperative evaluation, procedural preferences, and educational needs. Setting: Electronic survey distributed to colorectal surgeons of diverse practice settings. Participants: 249 colorectal surgeons responded to the survey, 65% of which were male. There was wide variability in age, years in practice, and practice setting. Main outcome measures: Responses to questions regarding preoperative workup preferences and clinical scenarios. Results: In preoperative evaluation, 19% would perform anorectal physiology testing and 70% would evaluate for concomitant pelvic organ prolapse. In a healthy patient, 90% would perform a minimally invasive abdominal approach, including ventral rectopexy (56%), suture rectopexy (31%), mesh rectopexy (6%) and resection rectopexy (5%). In terms of ventral rectopexy, surgeons in the Americas preferred a synthetic mesh (61.9% vs 38.1%, p=0.59) whereas surgeons from Australasia preferred biologic grafts (75% vs 25%, p<0.01). In an older patient with comorbidities 81% would perform a perineal approach. Procedure preference (Delormes vs Altmeier) varied according to location (Australasia, 85.9% vs 14.1%; Europe, 75.3% vs 24.7%; Americas, 14.1% vs 85.9%). Most participants were interested in education regarding surgical approaches, however there is wide variability in preferred methods. Conclusion: There is significant variability in the preoperative evaluation and surgery performed for rectal prolapse. Given the lack of consensus, it is not surprising that most surgeons desire further education on the topic.

Bleeding After Hemorrhoidectomy in Patients on Anticoagulation Medications.

BACKGROUND: Post-hemorrhoidectomy bleeding is a serious complication after hemorrhoidectomy. In the setting of a new wave of anticoagulants, we aimed to investigate the relationship of post-operative anticoagulation timing and delayed bleeding. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy at a single institution over a 10-year period. Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests were utilized to test for association between delayed bleeding and anticoagulation use. RESULTS: Between January 2011 and October 2020, 1469 hemorrhoidectomies were performed. A total of 216 (14.7%) were taking platelet inhibitors and 56 (3.8%) other anticoagulants. Delayed bleeding occurred in 5.2% (n = 76) of which 47% (n = 36) required operative intervention. Mean time to bleeding was 8.7 days (SD ±5.9). Time to bleeding was longer in those taking antiplatelet inhibitors vs. non-platelet inhibitors vs. none (11 vs. 8 vs. 7 days, P = .05). Among anticoagulants (n = 56), novel oral anticoagulants were more common than warfarin (57% vs 43%) and had a nonsignificant increase in delayed bleeding (31% vs 16%, P = .21). Later restart (>3 days) of novel anticoagulants after surgery was associated with increased bleeding (10.5% vs 61.5%, P=.005). On multivariable analysis, only anticoagulation use (OR 4.5, 95% CI: 2.1-10.0), male sex (OR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-2.9), and operative oversewing (OR 3.5, 95% CI: 1.8-6.9) were associated with delayed bleeding. CONCLUSION: Post-hemorrhoidectomy bleeding is more likely to occur with patients on anticoagulation. Later restart times within the first week after surgery was not associated with a decrease in bleeding.

Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) for colitis; development of Crohn's and Pouchitis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pouchitis and Crohn's disease after Ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis could be a larger issue than previously reported. METHODS: All patients receiving care for their IPAA over a 10-year period at a community hospital were included. Primary outcomes were incidence of Crohn's disease and pouchitis. RESULTS: The study included 380 IPAA patients. Indication for pouch creation was either UC (n = 362) or indeterminate colitis (n = 18). Cumulative incidence of Crohn's was 19.5%. Five-, 10- and 20-year incidence of Crohn's was 3.4%, 8.4% and 16.9%. Chronic pouchitis occurred in 28.7%. Mean time to pouchitis and Crohn's diagnosis was 8.4 (SD ± 8.0) and 11.6 (SD ± 7.5) years. Pouch failure occurred in 12.4%. Patients who developed Crohn's were more likely to suffer pouchitis and pouch failure (OR 3.5, 95%CI 2.0-6.0 and 5.3, 95%CI 2.8-10.1). CONCLUSION: During long term follow up, almost 20% are diagnosed with Crohn's contributing significantly to pouch failure.

Use of a standardized discharge checklist with daily post-operative C-reactive protein monitoring does not impact readmission rates after colon and rectal surgery.

PURPOSE: Elevated CRP has been associated with infectious complications after colorectal surgery but has not been evaluated in a prospective fashion as part of a discharge checklist. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-component "discharge criteria checklist" that included daily use of CRP in decreasing hospital readmission rates after colorectal surgery. METHODS: This is a prospective before and after study design that included consecutive patients undergoing major colorectal operations at a single university-affiliated community hospital over a 2-year period. The primary outcome was inpatient or emergency department readmission after 30 days. Selected pre- and peri-operative factors associated with readmissions were then examined in a multivariate analysis model. RESULTS: The study included a total of 1546 patients. Surgical indications were inflammatory bowel disease (15%), colorectal cancer (24%), and benign disease (60%); 9.5% were emergencies. The readmission rates for each group were similar, 17.3% and 17.0%, for the control and discharge checklist groups, respectively (p=0.88). On multivariate analysis of the discharge checklist group dataset, only age, sex, surgical acuity and operating time were statistically significant risk factors. The difference of median CRP values on the day of discharge of those readmitted compared to those not readmitted (35 vs 32 mg/L) was not statistically significant (p=0.28). CONCLUSIONS: The institution of a "discharge checklist" did not impact post-operative hospital readmissions. Not only were readmissions unchanged by the use of a CRP threshold at discharge, but CRP levels at the time of discharge were not associated with readmissions.

The Effect of Chronic Preoperative Opioid Use on Surgical Site Infections, Length of Stay, and Readmissions.

BACKGROUND: Chronic opioid use in the United States is a well-recognized public health concern with many negative downstream consequences. Few data exist regarding the use of preoperative opioids in relation to outcomes after elective colorectal surgery. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if chronic opioid use before colorectal surgery is associated with a detriment in postoperative outcomes. DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of administrative data supplemented by individual chart review. SETTING: This study was conducted in a single-institution, multisurgeon, community colorectal training practice. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery over a 3-year time frame (2011-2014) were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Opioid use was stratified based on total dose of morphine milligram equivalents (naive, sporadic use (>0-15 mg/day), regular use (>15-45 mg/day), and frequent use (>45 mg/day)). Primary outcomes were surgical site infections, length of hospital stay, and readmissions. RESULTS: Of the 923 patients, 23% (n = 213) were using opioids preoperatively. The preoperative opioid group contained more women (p = 0.047), underwent more open surgery (p = 0.003), had more nonmalignant indications (p = 0.013), and had a higher ASA classification (p = 0.003). Although median hospital stay was longer (4.7 days vs 4.0, p < 0.001), there was no difference in any surgical site infections (10.3% vs 7.1%, p = 0.123) or readmissions (14.2% vs 14.1%, p=0.954). Multivariable analysis identified preoperative opioid use (17.0% longer length of stay; 95% CI, 6.8%-28.2%) and ASA 3 or 4 (27.2% longer length of stay; 95% CI, 17.1-38.3) to be associated with an increase in length of stay. LIMITATIONS: Retrospectively abstracted opioid use and small numbers limit the conclusions regarding any dose-related responses on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although preoperative opioid use was not associated with an increased rate of surgical site infections or readmissions, it was independently associated with an increased hospital length of stay. Innovative perioperative strategies will be necessary to eliminate these differences for patients on chronic opioids. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B280. EFECTOS DEL CONSUMO CRÓNICO DE OPIOIDES EN EL PREOPERATORIO CON RELACIÓN A LAS INFECCIONES DE LA HERIDA QUIRÚRGICA, LA DURACIÓN DE LA ESTADÍA Y LA READMISIÓN: El consumo crónico de opioides en los Estados Unidos es un problema de salud pública bien reconocido a causa de sus multiples consecuencias negativas ulteriores. Existen pocos datos sobre el consumo de opioides en el preoperatorio relacionado con los resultados consecuentes a una cirugía colorrectal electiva.El propósito es determinar si el consumo crónico de opioides antes de la cirugía colorrectal se asocia con un detrimento en los resultados postoperatorios.Revisión retrospectiva de datos administrativos complementada por la revisión de un gráfico individual.Ejercicio durante la formación de multiples residentes en cirugía colorrectal enTodos los pacientes de cirugía colorrectal electiva durante un período de 3 años (2011-2014).El uso de opioides se estratificó en función de la dosis total de equivalentes de miligramos de morfínicos (uso previo, uso esporádico [> 0-15 mg / día], uso regular (> 15-45 mg / día) y uso frecuente (> 45 mg / día)). Los resultados primarios fueron las infecciones de la herida quirúrgica, la duración de la estadía hospitalaria y la readmisión.De los 923 pacientes, el 23% (n = 213) consumían opioides antes de la operación. El grupo con opioides preoperatorios tenía más mujeres (p = 0.047), se sometió a una cirugía abierta (p = 0.003), tenía mas indicaciones no malignas (p = 0.013) y tenía una clasificación ASA más alta (p = 0.003). Aunque la mediana de la estadía hospitalaria fue más larga (4,7 días frente a 4,0; p <0,001), no hubo diferencia en ninguna infección de la herida quirúrgica (10,3% frente a 7,1%, p = 0,123) o las readmisiones (14,2% frente a 14,1%, p = 0,954). El análisis multivariable identificó que el uso de opioides preoperatorios (17.0% más larga LOS; IC 95%: 6.8%, 28.2%) y ASA 3 o 4 (27.2% más larga LOS; IC 95%: 17.1, 38.3) se asocia con un aumento en LOS.La evaluación retrospectiva poco precisa del consumo de opioides y el pequeño número de casos limitan las conclusiones sobre cualquier respuesta relacionada con la dosis - resultado.Si bien el consumo de opioides preoperatorios no se asoció con un aumento en la tasa de infecciones de la herida quirúrgica o las readmisiones, ella se asoció de forma independiente con un aumento de la LOS hospitalaria. Serán necesarias estrategias perioperatorias innovadoras para eliminar estas diferencias en los pacientes consumidores cronicos de opioides. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B280.

Assessment of a circular powered stapler for creation of anastomosis in left-sided colorectal surgery: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Circular staplers perform a critical function for creation of anastomoses in colorectal surgeries. Powered stapling systems allow for reduced force required by surgeons to fire the device and may provide advantages for creating a secure anastomosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a novel circular powered stapler in a post-market setting, during left-sided colectomy procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive subjects underwent left-sided colorectal resections that included anastomosis performed with the ECHELON CIRCULAR™ Powered Stapler (ECP). The primary endpoint was the frequency in which a stapler performance issue was observed. Secondary endpoints included evaluation of ease of use of the device via a surgeon satisfaction questionnaire, and monitoring/recording of procedure-related adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 168 anastomoses were performed with the ECP. Surgical approaches included robotic-assisted (n = 74, 44.0%), laparoscopic (n = 71, 42.3%), open (n = 20, 11.9%), and hand-assisted minimally invasive (n = 3, 1.8%) procedures. There were 22 occurrences of device performance issues in 20 (11.9%) subjects during surgery. No positive intraoperative leak tests were observed, and only 1 issue was related to a procedure-related AE or surgical complication, which was an instance of incomplete surgical donut necessitating re-anastomosis. Postoperative anastomotic leaks were experienced in 4 (2.4%) subjects. Clavien-Dindo classification of all AEs indicated that 92.0% were Grades I or II. Participating surgeons rated the ECP as easier to use compared to previously used manual circular staplers in 85.7% of procedures. CONCLUSION: The circular powered stapler exhibited few clinically relevant performance issues, an overall favorable safety profile, and ease of use for creation of left-sided colon anastomoses.

Population-Based Analysis of Adherence to Postdischarge Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Colorectal Resection.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of venous thromboembolism after colorectal surgery remains challenging. National guidelines endorse thromboembolism prophylaxis for 4 weeks after colorectal cancer resection. Expert consensus favors extended prophylaxis after IBD surgery. The actual frequency of prescription after resection remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess prescription of extended, postdischarge venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after resection in Michigan. DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of elective colorectal resections within a statewide collaborative receiving postdischarge, extended-duration prophylaxis. SETTING: This study was conducted between October 2015 and February 2018 at an academic center. PATIENTS: A total of 5722 patients (2171 with colorectal cancer, 266 with IBD, and 3285 with other). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We compared the prescription of extended, postdischarge prophylaxis over time, between hospitals and by indication. RESULTS: Of 5722 patients, 373 (6.5%) received extended-duration prophylaxis after discharge. Use was similar between patients undergoing surgery for cancer (282/2171, 13.0%) or IBD (31/266, 11.7%, p = 0.54), but was significantly more common for both patients undergoing surgery for cancer or IBD in comparison with patients with other indications (60/3285, 1.8%, p < 0.001). Use increased significantly among patients with cancer (6.8%-16.8%, p < 0.001) and patients with IBD (0%-15.1%, p < 0.05) over the study period. For patients with other diagnoses, use was rare and did not vary significantly (1.5%-2.3%, p = 0.49). Academic centers and large hospitals (>300 beds) were significantly more likely to prescribe extended-duration prophylaxis for all conditions (both p < 0.001), with the majority of prophylaxis concentrated at only a few hospitals. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the lack of assessment of actual adherence, small number of observed venous thromboembolism events, small sample of patients with IBD, and restriction to the state of Michigan. CONCLUSIONS: The use of extended-duration venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after discharge is increasing, but remains uncommon in most hospitals. Efforts to improve adherence may require quality implementation initiatives or targeted payment incentives. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B193. ANÁLISIS POBLACIONAL DE LA ADHERENCIA A LA PROFILAXIS ANTI-TROMBÓTICA EXTENDIDA (TEV) EN PACIENTES DE ALTA LUEGO DE UNA RESECCIÓN COLORECTAL.: La prevención del tromboembolismo venoso después de cirugía colorrectal sigue siendo un desafío. Las guías nacionales han aprobado la profilaxia del tromboembolismo durante cuatro semanas luego de una resección de cáncer colorrectal. El consenso de expertos favorece la profilaxia extendida solamente después de la cirugía por enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. La frecuencia real de prescripción después de la resección colorrectal sigue siendo desconocida.Evaluar la prescripción de profilaxia prolongada de tromboembolismo venoso después del alta luego de una resección colorrectal en Michigan.Revisión retrospectiva de las resecciones colorrectales electivas seguidas de una profilaxia de larga duración con el apoyo de todo el estado (MI).Este estudio se realizó entre octubre de 2015 y febrero de 2018 en un solo centro académico.Un universo de 5722 pacientes operados (2171 por cáncer colorrectal, 266 por enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, 3285 por otros diagnósticos).Se comparó la prescripción de profilaxia prolongada después del alta según la duración, los hospitales y la indicación.De 5722 pacientes, 373 (6.5%) recibieron profilaxia de duración prolongada después del alta. El uso fue similar entre pacientes sometidos a cirugía por cáncer (282/2171, 13.0%) o enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (31/266, 11.7%, p = 0.54), pero fue significativamente más común para ambos en comparación con pacientes con otras indicaciones (60/3285, 1.8%, p < 0.001). El uso aumentó significativamente entre pacientes con cáncer (6.8% a 16.8% (p < 0.001)) y en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (0% a 15.1%, p < 0.05) durante el período de estudio. Para pacientes con otros diagnósticos, su utilización fue rara y no varió significativamente (1.5% a 2.3%, p = 0.49). Los centros académicos y los grandes hospitales (>300 camas) tenían mayor probabilidad de prescribir la profilaxia de duración extendida en todas las afecciones (ambas p < 0.001), pero la mayoría de las profilaxis se concentraron el algunos pocos grandes hospitales.Este estudio estuvo limitado por la falta de evaluación de actuales adherentes, por el pequeño número de eventos tromboembólicos venosos observados, por la pequeña muestra de pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y debido a ciertas restricciones en el estado de Michigan.El uso de profilaxia para el tromboembolismo venoso de duración prolongada después del alta está en aumento, pero su uso sigue siendo poco frecuente en la mayoría de los hospitales. Los esfuerzos para mejorar la adherencia al tratamiento pueden requerir iniciativas de mejoría en la calidad o incentivos específicos de reembolso. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B193. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).

Sigmoidectomy for Diverticulitis-A Propensity-Matched Comparison of Minimally Invasive Approaches.

BACKGROUND: As the availability and use of robotic surgery increases, current data suggest comparable outcomes to laparoscopic surgery but at an increased cost. Elective sigmoid resection for diverticular disease is the most common colorectal application of robotic surgery and there is limited comparative data specifically for this indication. METHODS: We identified all elective cases of laparoscopic- and robot-assisted surgery for diverticular disease among a practice of 7 colorectal surgeons within an established enhanced recovery protocol. We performed propensity matching based on surgical indications (recurrent disease, ongoing symptoms, or fistula), stoma creation, and body mass index to create a matched cohort. Our primary outcomes were return of bowel function, length of stay, opioid use, and pain scores during the first 72 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were operative room and hospital charges. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2016, 69 robotic cases were propensity matched from a group of 222 laparoscopic cases to create a 1:1 case ratio that was equivalent in terms of patient demographics and operative indications. Time to first bowel movement was slightly quicker in the robotic group (1 [1] versus 2 [1.5], P = 0.09), while length of stay (3.5 [1.6] versus 3.6 [1.4] d, P = 0.64) was equivalent. Pain scores were lower in the robotic group on day 0 (4.6 versus 6.1, P = 0.0001), but similar on day 1 and day 2 (4.3 versus 4.1, P = 0.62 and 3.8 versus 3.3, P = 0.19). There was no difference in postoperative 72-h opioid use between groups (110.8 MME [144.5] versus 97.4 MME [101.5], P = 0.70). In the robotic arm operating room charges were slightly more ($2835 ± $394 versus $2196 ± $359, P < 0.0001), but total hospital charges were over significantly increased ($41,159 [$7840] versus $25,761 [$11,689], P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Via a carefully matched cohort of elective sigmoid resection for diverticular disease at a single community institution, we have demonstrated that laparoscopic- and robotic-assisted surgery result in clinically equivalent return of bowel function, length of stay, postoperative pain, and opioid use.

Diverticulitis recurrence after percutaneous abscess drainage.

PURPOSE: Recurrent diverticulitis has been reported in 30-50% of patients who recover from an episode of diverticular-associated abscess. Our aim was to review the outcomes of patients who underwent non-operative management after percutaneous drainage (PD) of colonic diverticular abscess. METHODS: All patients with a diverticular-associated abscess were identified between 2001 and 2012. Individual charts were queried for peri-procedural data and follow-up. The most recent follow-up data were acquired via the electronic medical record or telephone call. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients underwent PD of diverticular-associated abscesses. Abscess locations were pelvic (n = 122), abdominal (n = 36), and both (n = 7), while median abscess size was 6.1 ± 2.2 cm. One hundred eighteen patients clinically improved following non-operative management, and 81 of these patients did not undergo subsequent colonic resection within 4 months of PD. Of these, 8 died within 12 months. Among the remaining 73 patients, there were no significant differences in demographics or abscess variables compared to those who underwent elective surgery within 4 months. Only 7 of 73 patients had documented episodes of recurrences, while 22 patients later had elective surgery (1.1 ± 1.2 years from the index case). Five-year colectomy-free survival was 55% (95%CI 42-66%), while the recurrence-free survival at 5 years was 77% (95%CI 65-86%). All recurrences were managed non-operatively initially and one patient went on to have elective resection. CONCLUSION: A sizable number of patients successfully recover from complicated diverticulitis following PD. Subsequent non-operative management carries an acceptable risk for recurrent episodes and may be considered as a reasonable management option.

Does CD10 Expression Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer?

BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative prediction of lymph node status would be a revolutionary adjunct in treating colorectal cancer. The immunohistochemical marker CD10 has been suggested recently to have a predictive capacity for lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between the presence of the CD10 molecular marker and lymph node metastasis in a US patient population using previously banked colorectal cancer specimens. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single academic institution. PATIENTS: Included were specimens from 191 patients, with cancer stages ranging from T1N0 to T3N2. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relationship between CD10 and different clinicopathologic parameters was assessed, as well as the ability to predict lymph node metastasis by itself and in conjunction with lymphovascular invasion. RESULTS: CD10 was significantly correlated with left-sided colon cancers (p = 0.01) and the presence of mucinous histology and had a relatively high specificity (75.7%) for lymph node metastasis. CD10 did not correlate with lymph node status (p = 0.33) or enhance the ability of lymphovascular invasion to predict lymphatic metastasis in our patient population. Sensitivity and specificity of lymphovascular invasion alone for lymph node metastasis were 62.8% and 93.6%, whereas adding CD10 status resulted in a sensitivity of 70.6% and specificity of 69.3%. Multivariate analysis revealed only lymphovascular invasion as a predictor of lymph node metastasis in our patient population. LIMITATIONS: This study was primarily limited by its small sample size and retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient population, CD10 status was not significantly associated with lymph node metastasis, and it was no better than lymphovascular invasion alone when predicting lymph node status.

Haplotypes at LBX1 have distinct inheritance patterns with opposite effects in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a clinically significant disorder with high heritability that affects 2-4% of the population. Genome-wide association studies have identified LBX1 as a strong susceptibility locus for AIS in Asian and Caucasian populations. Here we further dissect the genetic association with AIS in a Caucasian population. To identify genetic markers associated with AIS we employed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) design comparing 620 female Caucasian patients who developed idiopathic scoliosis during adolescence with 1,287 ethnically matched females who had normal spinal curves by skeletal maturity. The genomic region around LBX1 was imputed and haplotypes investigated for genetic signals under different inheritance models. The strongest signal was identified upstream of LBX1 (rs11190878, P(trend) = 4.18 × 10(-9), OR = 0.63[0.54-0.74]). None of the remaining SNPs pass the genome-wide significance threshold. We found rs11190870, downstream of LBX1 and previously associated with AIS in Asian populations, to be in modest linkage disequilibrium (LD) with rs11190878 (r(2) = 0.40, D' = 0.81). Haplotype analysis shows that rs11190870 and rs11190878 track a single risk factor that resides on the ancestral haplotype and is shared across ethnic groups. We identify six haplotypes at the LBX1 locus including two strongly associated haplotypes; a recessive risk haplotype (TTA, Control(freq) = 0.52, P = 1.25 × 10(-9), OR = 1.56), and a co-dominant protective haplotype (CCG, Control(freq) = 0.28, P = 2.75 × 10(-7), OR = 0.65). Together the association signals from LBX1 explain 1.4% of phenotypic variance. Our results identify two clinically relevant haplotypes in the LBX1-region with opposite effects on AIS risk. The study demonstrates the utility of haplotypes over un-phased SNPs for individualized risk assessment by more strongly delineating individuals at risk for AIS without compromising the effect size.

Case-matched series of a non-cross-linked biologic versus non-absorbable mesh in laparoscopic ventral rectopexy.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVR) is an emerging technique for selected patients with rectal prolapse and obstructed defaecation syndrome. Data are insufficient to conclude which type of mesh affords the greatest benefit. Our aim was to compare the outcomes of LVR using a non-cross-linked biologic versus a permanent mesh. METHODS: Twenty nine cases of LVR with permanent mesh were matched based on age and surgical indication with an equal number of patients using biologic mesh. Cases were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Symptom resolution, patient satisfaction and recurrence of prolapse were measured among those who underwent LVR with either a biologic (Biodesign(®), Cook Medical) or polypropylene mesh. RESULTS: Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, surgical indication and primary symptoms were not different between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 15.4 months, all patients reported being either completely or partially satisfied. Rates of complete or partial symptom resolution (p = 0.26) or satisfaction (p = 0.27) did not differ between groups. After LVR, similar rates of additional procedures were performed in the biologic (21 %) and the permanent (28 %) mesh group. Among patients with full-thickness prolapse (n = 33), there were five cases (15 %) of recurrence, one in the biologic group and four in the permanent mesh group (p = 0.37). There were no mesh-related complications in either group. CONCLUSIONS: LVR using a non-cross-linked biologic mesh appears to have comparable rates of symptom improvement and patient satisfaction in the short term. Longer follow-up will be required to determine if prolapse recurrence depends on mesh type.

Anastomotic leak after restorative proctosigmoidectomy for cancer: what are the chances of a permanent ostomy?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to identify rates and factors associated with permanent diversion following restorative proctosigmoidectomy for rectal cancer when complicated by an anastomotic leak. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review. SETTING: The setting of this study is a tertiary referral hospital PATIENTS: Patients involved in this study were those who underwent restorative rectal cancer surgery from 1997 through 2008 identified from an institutional cancer database. INTERVENTIONS: No interventions were performed in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors associated with time to ostomy closure and rates of permanent diversion following anastomotic leaks RESULTS: One hundred and thirty patients (mean age 59.7 years) were identified, 111 (85%) of whom had stoma diversion at the index surgery. Asymptomatic occult radiological leaks occurred in 52 patients (40%). Seventy-eight patients (60%) underwent ultimate ostomy closure at a median time of 6.3 months after the index surgery, which was not significantly affected by previous radiotherapy (p = 0.08). Twelve patients (9%) underwent anastomotic reconstruction. Pathologic stage II or greater (OR 4.42; 1.95-10.04), symptomatic presentation (OR 4.13; 1.86-9.19) and anastomotic disruption >5 mm (OR 4.42; 2.01-9.74) were independently associated with permanent diversion. Among all survivors, 33% did not have their ostomy reversed. Stoma diversion constructed after leak detection in 19 patients (15%) did not affect permanent stoma rate (OR 0.86; 0.31-2.34) or time to stoma closure (p = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of anastomotic leaks after restorative rectal cancer surgery can be salvaged without anastomotic reconstruction. However, in one third of the patients, an anastomotic leak results in a permanent stoma.