Apophyseal ilium avulsion fractures in young athletes: a systematic review and return to sport analysis.

The purpose of the current investigation was to synthesize the epidemiology, cause, management, and return to sport (RTS) outcomes of ilium avulsion fractures sustained during sporting activities in young athletes. Studies reporting on athletes <18 years old sustaining an avulsion fracture along the ilium [injury to the anterior superior or inferior iliac spine (ASIS or AIIS), or the iliac crest (IC)], and the athlete's RTS status were included. RTS was analyzed by injury acuity, location, mechanism of injury, and management, whereas complications were recorded. Seventy studies comprising 286 avulsions (169 ASIS, 87 AIIS, and 30 IC) were included. The mean age of athletes was 14.5 + 1.3 years (range, 8-18 years). Sprinting (n = 103/286; 36.0%) and soccer (n = 97/286; 33.9%) were the most common sports during which injuries occurred. A total of 96.5% (n = 276/286) of athletes reported successful RTS at an average of 16.2 + 19.3 weeks. The RTS rate for patients sustaining ASIS, AIIS, and IC avulsions was 95.3, 97.7, and 100%, respectively. Acute trauma was responsible for 89.8% (n = 158/176) of injuries, which demonstrated a significantly faster (13.3 + 9.3 weeks) and higher RTS rate (99.4%) compared with those with chronic avulsions (74.4 + 40.9 weeks and 83.3%, respectively). Those with complications (18.2%) had a significantly lower RTS rate (90.4%) and longer recovery (23.7 weeks) compared with athletes without complications (97.9% and 14.5 weeks, respectively). Outcomes were not significantly different based on sex or management. However, chronic avulsions and postoperative complications sustained worse RTS results. An accurate and timely diagnosis is crucial when presented with these rare injuries to avoid increasing the chronicity of injury.

The biomechanics of osteoarthritis in the hand: Implications and prospects for hand therapy.

BACKGROUND: The unique anatomy of the human hand makes it possible to carefully manipulate tools, powerfully grasp objects, and even throw items with precision. These apparent contradictory functions of the hand, high mobility for manual dexterity vs high stability during forceful grasping, imply that daily activities impose a high strain on a relatively instable joint. This makes the hand susceptible to joint disorders such as osteoarthritis. Both systemic (eg, genetics, hormones) and mechanical factors (eg, joint loading) are important in the development of osteoarthritis, but the precise pathomechanism remains largely unknown. This paper focuses on the biomechanical factors in the disease process and how hand therapists can use this knowledge to improve treatment and research. CONCLUSION: Multiple factors are involved in the onset and development of osteoarthritis in the hand. Comprehension of the biomechanics helps clinicians establish best practices for orthotics intervention, exercise, and joint protection programs even in de absence of clear evidence-based guidelines. The effect and reach of hand therapy for OA patients can be expanded substantially when intervention parameters are optimized and barriers to early referrals, access reimbursement, and adherence are addressed. Close and early collaboration between hand therapists and primary care, women's health, rheumatology, and hand surgery providers upon diagnosis, and with hand surgeons pre and postoperatively, combined with advances in the supporting science and strategies to enhance adherence, appear to be a promising way forward.