ABSTRACT
EEG power spectra were studied in two poor-reading adolescent groups (dysphonetic and phonetic) as the students viewed strings of letters and easy words (seven categories). The students ranged in age from 12 to 16 years; 29 were male, 9 were female. Bilateral results are reported from frontal, parietal, and occipital regions. Significant Group x Hemisphere effects were found in the alpha and beta bands, with the phonetic group showing right greater than left asymmetry. This finding was interpreted to reflect more circumscribed and mature processing in the phonetically abler poor readers, given that normally reading adults typically show right greater than left asymmetry in word tasks. Overall, the dysphonetic group had higher beta power than the phonetic group, which may reflect greater effort.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Dyslexia/physiopathology , Electroencephalography , Adolescent , Analysis of Variance , Case-Control Studies , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dyslexia/classification , Female , Humans , Male , PhoneticsABSTRACT
We tested 186 children ranging in age from 6 years, 10 months to 13 years, 7 months; 174 suffered either physical and/or sexual abuse, and 12 were nonabused children. Abused subjects were grouped in four different ways. The primary grouping was based on whether subjects satisfied the DSM III-R criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Secondary groupings were based upon the three symptom clusters used to make the PTSD diagnosis (arousal, avoidance, and reexperiencing). In each of these groupings three separate subgroups were formed with approximately 25 percent in the high and low symptom count subgroups and the remaining 50 percent in the middle symptom count subgroup. Subjects listened to four different intensity levels (65, 80, 95, and 102 dB) of a 1 KHz tone, pseudo-randomly ordered, while event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded. Two separate blocks were used, one with short intervals (4 +/- 1 sec) between tones and the other with longer intervals (17 +/- 2 sec). PTSD subjects presented a greater P2-N2 ERP intensity gradient (i.e., a larger increase in the P2-N2 ERP component as tone intensity increased) than did abused subjects without PTSD. Abused subjects with the highest number of reexperiencing symptoms showed a similar P2-N2 augmenting effect when compared to those with the lowest number of reexperiencing symptoms. Subjects with the highest number of arousal symptoms showed a shallower intensity gradient for the N1-P2 ERP component than did those with fewer arousal symptoms. The results are discussed in relation to previous results reported on adults with PTSD and in terms of CNS processing of stimulus intensity information.
Subject(s)
Child Abuse/psychology , Electroencephalography , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Arousal/physiology , Child , Child Abuse, Sexual/psychology , Evoked Potentials , Female , Galvanic Skin Response/physiology , Heart Rate/physiology , Humans , Male , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychologyABSTRACT
Event-related brain potentials were recorded while disabled adolescent subjects read and judged whether two sequentially presented pictures had names that rhymed. Subjects with relatively good phonetic skills displayed an N400 priming effect, i.e., a significant reduction in the amplitude of the negative peak, occurring approximately 400 msec post-stimulus, for pictures with names that rhymed with preceding pictures as compared with pictures that had names that did not rhyme with the prime. No such effect was evident for subjects with relatively poor phonetic skills. This lack of an N400 priming effect provides evidence for a reduction in neural capacity and/or activation during phonological processing in the subjects with poor phonological skills. Demonstrating the N400 priming effect to be stronger in one group of reading disabled subjects, compared to another, supports the position that specific subtypes of reading disability exist. In addition to the stronger N400 priming effect, the phonetically stronger group also exhibited an enhanced negativity, from 700 to 1,000 msec after target stimulus onset, compared to phonetically inferior subjects. This finding replicates earlier work and possibly reflects a higher level of confidence in the group with better phonetic skills.
Subject(s)
Arousal/physiology , Contingent Negative Variation/physiology , Dyslexia/physiopathology , Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology , Phonetics , Verbal Learning/physiology , Adolescent , Attention/physiology , Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Child , Dyslexia/diagnosis , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Male , Reference Values , Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedABSTRACT
Two subtypes of poor readers, dysphonetic and phonetic, were compared on EEG spectral values obtained as they viewed strings of letters and short words. Dysphonetic poor readers had significantly higher values than phonetics in the theta and delta bands. Both phonetic and dysphonetic poor readers had lower beta values than adequate reading children with Attention Deficit Disorder. This evidence indicates that poor readers, especially dysphonetics, were less actively engaged in the task.
Subject(s)
Electroencephalography , Phonetics , Reading , Achievement , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/complications , Child , Cognition , Delta Rhythm , Female , Humans , Male , Theta RhythmABSTRACT
EEG power spectra were studied in two poor reader groups (with dyslexia and slow learning) and a normally reading clinic control group (with attention deficit disorder) as the children viewed strings of words and letters (seven categories). The children ranged in age from 7.5 to 12 years; 33 were girls, 86 were boys. Bilateral temporal and parietal sites and four midline sites were used. The major difference between groups was in the low beta band, where the ADD group had greater power at the parietal and midline sites. Also, the slow learner group had marginally greater low beta at the left than right temporal site, with the opposite trend found for the dyslexic and ADD groups. Across groups, power was greater at the right than at the left parietal site in the delta and alpha bands and at the right than at the left temporal site in the low beta band. Stimulus category effects were modest, with some alpha suppression to word strings, relative to letter strings, found in the poor readers. In correlational analyses, the combination of greater low beta and less theta power significantly predicted better reading and spelling. Results indicate that the adequate readers more actively processed the stimuli than did the poor readers.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Dyslexia/physiopathology , Electroencephalography , Learning Disabilities/physiopathology , Reading , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Verbal Learning/physiology , Attention/physiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Cerebral Cortex/physiology , Child , Dyslexia/diagnosis , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Female , Humans , Learning Disabilities/diagnosis , Male , Phonetics , SemanticsABSTRACT
In a visual event-related potential (ERP) study, children diagnosed as dyslexic in terms of both age and IQ discrepancy criteria were compared with two contrast groups: poor for age (SLOW) readers and normal reading children with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD). The children viewed 200 stimulus pairs and judged whether the second stimulus of each pair rhymed with the first. The first stimulus was always a three-letter word, while half of the second stimuli were pronounceable nonsense words and half were real words. Rhyme probability was 50%. The ERP waveforms of the dyslexics were significantly different from those of the ADD group in showing less late negativity. The SLOW group's waveforms more closely paralleled those of the ADD group. The major anomalous feature of the dyslexics' waveform was a pronounced late positive peak (P500), which followed an attenuated N450 peak. Over all groups, the N450 peak was sensitive to the rhyme manipulation, as has been found in adults (Rugg, 1984a, 1984b). Real words and nonsense words produced similar waveforms. Hemispheric effects were found but did not interact with group. Results suggest non-automatic visual cognitive processing of rhyme in dyslexics.
Subject(s)
Arousal/physiology , Attention/physiology , Dyslexia/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology , Paired-Associate Learning/physiology , Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Child , Dyslexia/diagnosis , Dyslexia/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Reaction Time/physiology , Semantics , Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedABSTRACT
Using a two-stimulus reaction time paradigm, with two separate reward conditions (contingent and noncontingent), we compared slow wave brain potentials (ERPs) in 144 children with attention deficit disorder (ADD) and 30 normal control children. This article reviews the findings during the 900 msec visual warning stimulus. As we had expected, based on ERP work of Forth and Hare (1989) and Raine, Venables and Williams (1990), and on previous work from our own laboratory, the group differences were found in the negative slow wave portions of the ERP complex during the contingent reward condition but not during the noncontingent condition. Aggressive hyperactive subjects with attention deficit disorder (ADDHA) were discriminated from nonaggressive subjects (including control subjects) during the contingent reward condition in the following ways: (1) greater fronto-central negativity (640-900 msec slow wave) and (2) greater right parietal than left parietal negativity (430-750 msec slow wave). All ADD subgroups, when compared to control (CONTR) subjects, showed greater slow wave negativity (700-900 msec) at the midline occipital electrode site during the contingent reward condition. This could be explained in part as an IQ effect on ERPs reflecting the IQ difference between the ADD subgroups and the controls. These slow wave findings seem to relate to attentional problems of these children. They are discussed in terms of a psychobiological model of inhibition/disinhibition and appetitive activation.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Dominance, Cerebral/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology , Aggression/physiology , Attention/physiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Motivation , Parietal Lobe/physiopathology , Reaction Time/physiologyABSTRACT
Beat-to-beat heart rate (HR) was analyzed for 9 contiguous seconds in a warned reaction time (RT) paradigm. Imperative stimuli were tones of three intensity levels (55, 78, and 100 db); a visual warning signal occurred 5 sec before tone onset. Baseline and reward conditions were run. Normal controls were contrasted with three Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) subgroups: ADD-only, ADD with hyperactivity (ADDH), ADD with hyperactivity and aggression (ADDHA). The ADD subgroups were predicted to show less deceleration in HR because of their problem sustaining readiness to respond. Significant sex x group differences in HR levels and change scores were found. Overall, girls had higher HR levels than boys and the ADD-only group (boys and girls) had lower HRs than the other ADD groups. But, the ADD-only boys had more marked deceleration to the warning signal and acceleration to the tones than the other ADD boys, whereas the ADD-only girls were no more reactive than the ADDH and ADDHA girls. Control girls had the highest HR levels and were the most reactive to stimuli. Control boys and ADD-only boys had similar HR levels and reaction patterns. ADD-only girls appear to be underaroused, whereas ADD-only boys do not. Results suggest that cardiac measures can provide external validation of disruptive and nondisruptive ADD subtypes.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Heart Rate/physiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Reaction Time/physiology , Reward , Sex CharacteristicsABSTRACT
Using an auditory stimulus intensity paradigm, we obtained both event related potentials (ERPs) and press and release reaction times (RT) from a large sample of children with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD). The ERP gradients to three tone intensities were used to classify the children as augmenters (steep gradients), moderates, or reducers (shallow or negative gradients). The RT data were used to classify the children as strong or sensitive, following neo-Pavlovian guidelines. The children were then cross-classified on these two dimensions and compared on cognitive, behavioral, and performance measures. The groups were also compared in response to two dosage levels of methylphenidate. Based on prior studies, we hypothesized that: 1. ERP augmenters would respond as well to the low as high dose but that reducers would respond better to high than low dose; and II. sensitive types (RT measure) would do better on the higher dose and strong types on the low dose. The first hypothesis was confirmed on a performance task but not on behavioral ratings. At the lower dose, augmenters improved most and reducers least on a 10-minute coding task presumed to require sustained attention. There was no support for the second hypothesis either in ratings or performance. The ERP augmentation measure was significantly related to teacher rated attentiveness; i.e., reducers and moderates were rated more adversely. The RT sensitivity measure tended to be related to achievement; i.e., strong types had lower reading and spelling scores. The ERP and RT sensitivity measures were not significantly correlated.
Subject(s)
Arousal/drug effects , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Loudness Perception/drug effects , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , Reaction Time/drug effects , Attention/drug effects , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Child , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/drug effects , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
The automated laboratory systems described in this paper were developed for use at the National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR) and each of five collaborating laboratories. These laboratories participated in a study designed to evaluate the intra- and interlaboratory reliability and sensitivity of several behavioral test methods used in developmental toxicity studies. This paper describes two microcomputer systems. System I was designed to control stimulus delivery to and record behavioral responses from rats during a visual discrimination learning task and to accept data from physical landmark, negative geotaxis, and olfactory discrimination evaluations. The microprocessor system was an S-100 bus, Z-80 processor with 8K PROM, 16K RAM, nine 8-bit parallel I/O ports, and one serial I/O port. For discrimination learning, the animal testing apparatus consisted of six operant chambers, equipped with two stimulus lights, two nose-poke apertures each containing a phototransmitter and receiver, an electromechanical liquid dispenser unit, and a reward bowl also containing a photodiode. Each chamber was interfaced with the microprocessor at a parallel I/O port which permitted the delivery of response- or time-contingent control signals for the lights and liquid dispenser units. System II controlled stimulus delivery and recorded behavioral responses from rats during an auditory startle habituation task, and also recorded rodent activity levels in figure 8 mazes for periods of 1, 4, or 23 hours. The microprocessor system was an S-100 bus, Z-80 processor with 8K PROM, 16K RAM, nine parallel I/O ports, an analog to digital (A/D) I/O board, and one serial I/O port.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Subject(s)
Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Teratogens/toxicity , Acoustic Stimulation , Animals , Discrimination Learning/drug effects , Discrimination, Psychological/drug effects , Female , Habituation, Psychophysiologic/drug effects , Humans , Information Systems , Pregnancy , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Psychology, Experimental/instrumentation , Rats , Reflex, Startle/drug effects , Reversal Learning/drug effects , Smell/drug effects , SoftwareSubject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Attention , Dyslexia/psychology , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Psychological Tests , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
Heart rate and skin conductance measures, recorded during a visual search task, were compared for hyperactive, reading-disabled, hyperactive reading-disabled, and control elementary school boys. As shown in past work, basal autonomic levels did not statistically differentiate groups. In all groups, heart rate levels increased with task complexity, but more so on reward than on nonreward trials. In the intertrial interval, heart rate decelerated consistently when subjects were anticipating stimuli associated with reward, but when reward was uncertain, heart rate accelerated slightly or stayed the same. Control subjects exhibited anticipatory heart rate deceleration more consistently than did clinical subjects, especially the solely hyperactive ones. Skin conductance levels first decreased, then rose as task complexity increased, but the groups did not differ on this measure. A conditioning model is outlined to explain directional changes in heart rate.
Subject(s)
Arousal , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Discrimination Learning , Dyslexia/psychology , Form Perception , Pattern Recognition, Visual , Attention , Child , Galvanic Skin Response , Heart Rate , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
Ten boys in each of four groups (hyperactive, learning-disabled, hyperactive/learning-disabled or mixed, and normal) were exposed to a complex visual search task. EEGs were recorded at central and parietal sites, 1-sec prestimulus and 1-sec poststimulus onset, on three types of trials. The resulting wave forms, averaged over trials, were converted to the frequency domain via a fast Fourier transform and factored by principal components. Four components accounting for 87% of the variance were varimax-rotated. Analyses of variance of the component scores revealed that Component 1 differentiated the four groups of boys. This component had highest loadings in frequencies from 16 to 20 Hz and secondary loading in frequencies from 7 to 10 Hz. It was concluded that this multifrequency component is sensitive to parameters deficient in hyperactive and learning-disabled children.