Continuity in Undergraduate Medical Education: Mission Not Accomplished.

Evidence is mounting that longitudinal medical student clerkships provide better educational experiences than traditional block clerkship "silos." Education studies across institutions demonstrate positive effects of continuity on medical students, including creating patient-centered learning environments, improving fidelity of evaluations and feedback, improving medical student patient-centeredness, enabling more autonomous functioning in the clinical workplace, and increased recruitment and retention of students into primary care careers. Outcome studies show potential for longitudinal students to add value to patient care. This perspective piece summarizes the current evidence basis for longitudinal clerkships broken down by Kirkpatrick level (reactions, perceptions/attitudes, knowledge, behaviors, and patient benefits). Despite this evidence, expansion of longitudinal clerkships has been slow-i.e., fewer than half of current US medical schools offer one. While more recent curricular innovations center around Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), there are clear opportunities for medical schools to use longitudinal clerkships as a lens through which EPAs can be effectively evaluated. This perspective highlights the synergy between longitudinal clerkships and EPAs, showing that successful implementation of the former should empower the latter. While large, complex educational interventions are daunting tasks, change is needed. Regulatory organizations should mandate continuity-focused experiences for US medical graduates.

A review of longitudinal clinical programs in US medical schools.

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal clinical experiences are a common component of undergraduate medical curricula, yet these programs have not been systematically characterized in US medical schools. OBJECTIVE: Our study sought to identify and characterize longitudinal clinical programs (LCPs) in US medical schools and measure associations between programs' structures and goals. DESIGN: Using a mixed-methods approach, we conducted a secondary analysis of data from publicly available websites. We conducted a systematic keyword search of the websites of 137 LCME-accredited US medical schools to identify LCPs. We included programs with student-patient interactions of at least six months. We categorized programs using qualitative thematic analysis and compared associations between program structures and goals. RESULTS: We identified 98 LCPs in 69 schools. Half (52.0%) of LCPs occurred during the core clinical year. Program structures included 'clinic attachments' (50.0%), 'longitudinal integrated clerkships' (26.5%), and 'patient attachments' (20.4%). We identified goals in 89 programs, including 'exposing students to specific topics, patient demographics, or practice settings' (78.7%); 'clinical or professional skill development' (65.2%); and 'understanding the patient experience' (19.1%). Patient attachments were associated with 'exposure to specific patient demographics' (P = .04) and 'understanding the patient experience' (P = .03). Pre-clinical programs were associated with clinical skills development (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies the scope and nature of LCPs in US medical schools. Understanding connections between educational structures and goals may guide program design and research investigations of educational processes and outcomes.

In Pursuit of Educational Integrity: Professional Identity Formation in the Harvard Medical School Cambridge Integrated Clerkship.

Graduates of Harvard Medical School's Cambridge Integrated Clerkship (CIC) describe several core processes that may underlie professional identity formation (PIF): encouragement to integrate pre-professional and professional identities; support for learner autonomy in discovering meaningful roles and responsibilities; learning through caring relationships; and a curriculum and an institutional culture that make values explicit. The authors suggest that the benefits of educational integrity accrue when idealistic learners inhabit an educational model that aligns with their own core values, and when professional development occurs in the context of an institutional home that upholds these values. Medical educators should clarify and animate principles within curricula and learning environments explicitly in order to support the professional identity formation of their learners.

Bearing witness: a longitudinal integrated cancer care curriculum.

BACKGROUND: The Harvard Medical School Cambridge Integrated Clerkship longitudinal cancer curriculum directly facilitates students' engagement with cancer patients to develop a comprehensive understanding of the disease and the patient's experience of illness. Third-year medical students follow newly diagnosed cancer patients over the course of a year, across all disciplines, and make formal presentations to a multidisciplinary forum at the end of the year. The aim of the study was to discover which aspects of longitudinal care were most meaningful to the students themselves. METHOD: Researchers performed a qualitative thematic analysis of students' presentations. Basing the analysis on principles of grounded theory, researchers took an inductive approach using the constant comparative method to discover core themes and to cluster themes into encompassing domains. RESULT: Researchers identified 33 individual themes among 60 presentations, reflecting five major domains: clinical issues; patient characteristics; systems problems; psychosocial response to cancer; and existential decision making. CONCLUSIONS: In this qualitative study of students' year-end final presentations after a year of cancer care experiences, two areas stood out: students perceived the complexities of medical decision making and students considered the impact of psychosocial factors on patients facing this disease over time. Which aspects of longitudinal care were most meaningful to the students(?).

Blueprint for an Undergraduate Primary Care Curriculum.

In light of the increasing demand for primary care services and the changing scope of health care, it is important to consider how the principles of primary care are taught in medical school. While the majority of schools have increased students' exposure to primary care, they have not developed a standardized primary care curriculum for undergraduate medical education. In 2013, the authors convened a group of educators from primary care internal medicine, pediatrics, family medicine, and medicine-pediatrics, as well as five medical students to create a blueprint for a primary care curriculum that could be integrated into a longitudinal primary care experience spanning undergraduate medical education and delivered to all students regardless of their eventual career choice.The authors organized this blueprint into three domains: care management, specific areas of content expertise, and understanding the role of primary care in the health care system. Within each domain, they described specific curriculum content, including longitudinality, generalism, central responsibility for managing care, therapeutic alliance/communication, approach to acute and chronic care, wellness and prevention, mental and behavioral health, systems improvement, interprofessional training, and population health, as well as competencies that all medical students should attain by graduation.The proposed curriculum incorporates important core features of doctoring, which are often affirmed by all disciplines but owned by none. The authors argue that primary care educators are natural stewards of this curriculum content and can ensure that it complements and strengthens all aspects of undergraduate medical education.

Learners, performers, caregivers, and team players: Descriptions of the ideal medical student in longitudinal integrated and block clerkships.

BACKGROUND: Hidden curriculum literature suggests that different learning environments and curricular designs reinforce disparate values and behaviors. AIM: This study explores potential differences in learning environments afforded by two clerkship models through perceptions of the ideal student. METHODS: In this qualitative study, research assistants interviewed 48 third-year students and 26 clinical supervisors from three US medical schools. Students and supervisors participated in longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) or block clerkships. Students and supervisors described the ideal student in their clerkship. Using phenomenographic techniques, authors identified five ideal student profiles and coded students' and supervisors' descriptions for alignment with one or more profiles. RESULTS: Most students in both models described an ideal student who matched a learner profile (proactive and self-directed). More LIC students described an ideal student who fit a caregiver profile (engaging with and advocating for patients) and more block students described performer (appearing knowledgeable and competent) and team-player (working well with others) profiles. Supervisors' descriptions paralleled students' descriptions but with less emphasis on caregiving. CONCLUSIONS: Ideal student descriptions in LIC and block models may reflect different learning experiences and values emphasized in each model. These findings suggest implications for students' construction of professional identities that warrant further exploration.

Into the future: patient-centredness endures in longitudinal integrated clerkship graduates.

OBJECTIVES: This study was intended to determine if previously identified educational benefits of the Harvard Medical School (HMS) Cambridge Integrated Clerkship (CIC) endure over time. METHODS: The authors' earlier work compared the 27 graduates in the first three cohorts of students undertaking the CIC with a comparison group of 45 traditionally trained HMS students; CIC graduates emerged from their clerkship year with a higher degree of patient-centredness and felt more prepared to deal with numerous domains of patient care. Between April and July 2011, at 4-6 years post-clerkship, the authors asked these original study cohorts to complete an electronic survey which included measures used in the original study. The authors also reviewed data from the National Residency Match Program to compare career paths in the two groups. RESULTS: The response rate was 62% (42/68). The immediate post-clerkship finding that CIC students held more patient-centred attitudes was sustained over time (p < 0.035). Reflecting retrospectively on their clerkship experiences, CIC graduates continued to report that their clerkship year had better prepared them in a wide variety of domains. Graduates of the CIC attained awards and published papers at the same rates as peers, and were more likely to engage in health advocacy work. Both groups chose a wide range of residency programmes. Among those expressing a preference, no CIC graduates said they would choose a traditional clerkship, but 6 (27%) of the traditionally trained graduates said they would choose a longitudinal integrated clerkship. CONCLUSIONS: This paper indicates that benefits of longitudinal integrated clerkship training are sustained over time across multiple domains.

More is better: students describe successful and unsuccessful experiences with teachers differently in brief and longitudinal relationships.

PURPOSE: Clerkship experiences that structure student-teacher continuity may promote learning differently than brief student-teacher relationships. The authors compared students' successful and unsuccessful teaching experiences in brief and longitudinal relationships. METHOD: A multicenter, qualitative interview study was conducted in 2009-2010 of students in two clerkship models that provide different durations of student-teacher relationships. Each student described a successful and unsuccessful teaching relationship early and late in the core clerkship year. Questions explored teachers' strategies and behaviors and students' efforts to improve unsuccessful relationships. Interview transcripts were coded to identify major themes. RESULTS: Fifty-four students completed interviews. Students in brief relationships struggled to be known; students in longitudinal relationships felt respected as learners and partners. Teaching strategies differed in the two relationship durations. Questioning about factual knowledge was common in brief relationships; collaborative knowledge sharing and application to patients occurred in longitudinal relationships. Hierarchy characterized brief relationships. Longitudinal students experienced evolving expectations in response to their growing skills and contributions. Only students in longitudinal relationships described successfully intervening to improve unsuccessful relationships; students in brief relationships felt powerless. CONCLUSIONS: Clerkship students in brief relationships learn to adapt to teachers' preferences and questioning to facilitate their participation and knowledge acquisition; longitudinal students experience collaborative interactions focused on their development as care providers. In longitudinal relationships, students gain confidence to influence their own learning and modify circumstances to meet their learning needs. These findings suggest that medical students' clinical experiences may be enhanced by deliberately structuring longitudinal attachments to supervisors.

The role of role: learning in longitudinal integrated and traditional block clerkships.

CONTEXT: Traditional block clerkship (BC) structures may not optimally support medical student participation in the workplace, whereas longitudinal integrated clerkship (LIC) structures seem more conducive to students' active engagement in patient care over time. Understanding the ways in which these two clerkship models influence students' roles and responsibilities can inform clinical learning programme design. METHODS: This was a multicentre qualitative study. We conducted semi-structured interviews with LIC and BC medical students at three institutions early and late in the core clinical year to explore their experiences with patients and the roles they served. Using the framework of 'workplace affordances', qualitative coding focused on students' roles and qualities of the learning environment that invited or inhibited student participation. We compared transcripts of early- and late-year interviews to assess students' changing roles and conducted discrepant case analysis to ensure that coding fit the data. RESULTS: Fifty-four students participated in interviews. They described serving three major roles in clinical care that respectively involved: providing support to patients; sharing information about patients across health care settings, and functioning in a doctor-like role. Both LIC and BC students served in the providing support and transmitting information roles both early and late in the year. By contrast, LIC students commonly served in the doctor-like role in managing their patients' care, particularly late in the year, whereas BC students rarely served in this role. Continuity in settings and in supervisors, and preceptors' endorsement of students' legitimate role afforded opportunities for students to participate actively in patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Although both LIC and BC students reported serving in important roles in supporting their patients and sharing information about their care, only LIC students consistently described opportunities to grow into a doctor role with patients. The high level of integration of LIC students into care systems and their deeper relationships with preceptors and patients enhanced their motivation and feelings of competence to provide patient-centred care.

Students' workplace learning in two clerkship models: a multi-site observational study.

CONTEXT: Longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) are established, rapidly growing models of education designed to improve the core clinical year of medical school using guiding principles about workplace learning and continuity. This study is the first to report data from direct observations of workplace learning experiences of students on LICs and traditional block clerkships (BCs), respectively. METHODS: This multi-institution study used an observational, work-sampling methodology to compare LIC and BC students early and late in the core clinical year. Trained research assistants documented students' activities, participation (observing, with assistance, alone), and interactions every 10 minutes over 4-hour periods. Each student was observed one to three times early and/or late in the year. Data were aggregated at the student level and by in-patient or out-patient setting for BC students. One-way analysis of variance (anova) was used to compare two groups early in the year (LIC and BC students) and three groups late in the year (LIC, out-patient BC and in-patient BC students). RESULTS: Early-year observations included 26 students (16 LIC and 10 BC students); late-year observations included 44 students (28 LIC, eight out-patient BC and eight in-patient BC students). Out-patient activities and interactions of LIC and BC students were similar early in the year, but in the later period LIC students spent significantly more time performing direct patient care activities alone (25%) compared with out-patient (12%) and in-patient (7%) BC students. Students on LICs were significantly more likely to experience continuity with patients as 34% of their patients returned to them, whereas only 5% of patients did so for out-patient BC students late in the year. CONCLUSIONS: By late year, LIC students engage in patient care more independently and have more opportunities to see clinic patients on multiple occasions than BC students. Consistent with the principles of workplace learning, these findings suggest that yearlong longitudinal integrated education models, that rely mostly on ambulatory settings, afford students greater opportunities to participate more fully in the provision of patient care.

Teaching medical students about cancer impact through a longitudinal surgical experience: a case study.

BACKGROUND: We designed and execute a longitudinal curriculum that provides a comprehensive understanding of cancer illness and its impact upon the patient. SUMMARY: The Harvard Medical School-Cambridge Integrated Clerkship is a redesign of the 3rd year where the traditional rotations are replaced by a single integrated year-long experience. Students are required to follow a patient with newly diagnosed gastrointestinal cancer and breast cancer, across all venues and disciplines. Twenty-nine of 34 students responded to a survey. On average patients were followed for 7 months, through 12 encounters across 4 different specialties. Students responded that this experience facilitated their understanding of cancer in a way not feasible in a traditional clerkship model. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students perceive that this longitudinal model of cancer education improves integration of the surgical, medical, scientific, emotional, and social issues. Traditional "block rotation" students and even residents are rarely afforded such an educational opportunity.

Educational outcomes of the Harvard Medical School-Cambridge integrated clerkship: a way forward for medical education.

PURPOSE: The authors report data from the Harvard Medical School-Cambridge Integrated Clerkship (CIC), a model of medical education in which students' entire third year consists of a longitudinal, integrated curriculum. The authors compare the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of students completing the CIC with those of students completing traditional third-year clerkships. METHOD: The authors compared 27 students completing the first three years of the CIC (2004-2007) with 45 students completing clerkships at other Harvard teaching hospitals during the same period. At baseline, no significant between-group differences existed (Medical College Admission Test and Step 1 scores, second-year objective structured clinical examination [OSCE] performance, attitudes toward patient-centered care, and plans for future practice) in any year. The authors compared students' National Board of Medical Examiners Subject and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores, OSCE performance, perceptions of the learning environment, and attitudes toward patient-centeredness. RESULTS: CIC students performed as well as or better than their traditionally trained peers on measures of content knowledge and clinical skills. CIC students expressed higher satisfaction with the learning environment, more confidence in dealing with numerous domains of patient care, and a stronger sense of patient-centeredness. CONCLUSIONS: CIC students are at least as well as and in several ways better prepared than their peers. CIC students also demonstrate richer perspectives on the course of illness, more insight into social determinants of illness and recovery, and increased commitment to patients. These data suggest that longitudinal integrated clerkships offer students important intellectual, professional, and personal benefits.

Can changes in the principal clinical year prevent the erosion of students' patient-centered beliefs?

PURPOSE: The third year of medical school, in which students traditionally receive their first immersion into hospital-based clinical medicine, often results in a degradation of attitudes toward medicine and patient care. The authors present data collected in the 2005-2006 academic year from a pilot program aimed at enhancing this experience, thereby enabling students to resist these negative influences. METHOD: Thirty-two Harvard Medical School students, who spent their entire principal clinical experience (PCE) at one of three clinical sites (PCE group), completed the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS), a measure of patient-centered attitudes, at the beginning of the year. They completed the PPOS again at year's end as well as the Community, Curriculum, and Culture (C3) hidden curriculum measure of patient-centered clinical experiences. Their responses on these measures were compared with those of a traditional-rotation control group that moved from site to site. RESULTS: At the beginning of the year, no PPOS differences were found within PCE groups or between PCE and control students. Traditional students' attitudes became significantly less patient-centered at year's end, whereas PCE students' attitudes did not change. PCE students reported more support for their patient-centered behaviors, and, across all students, C3 scores and changes in PPOS scores were significantly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: Innovations in clinical education may help inoculate medical students against the degradation of attitudes. Although this research was a test of a small pilot program, the consistent pattern of findings across those clinical sites and educational models studied provides suggestive evidence that the oft-cited negative impacts of the principal clinical year are not inevitable.

Learning through longitudinal patient care-narratives from the Harvard Medical School-Cambridge Integrated Clerkship.

PURPOSE: Most medical schools value and seek to create opportunities for students to learn through experiences in the longitudinal care of patients. A number of innovative programs have made longitudinal care the central experiential component of principal clinical year education.The authors sought to identify ways in which learning through the longitudinal care of patients in an innovative longitudinal integrated clerkship contributes to the education of students in their principal clinical year. METHOD: The authors reviewed 16 narratives written by 14 of the 38 students from the first four years of the Harvard Medical School-Cambridge Integrated Clerkship, 2004-2007, to identify important aspects of learning from longitudinal care. RESULTS: Students reported that the clerkship structure created a dynamic learning environment that helped them to more broadly learn about their patients' diseases and experiences of illness. Students described feeling deeply connected to "their" patients, which transformed their roles and inspired their reflections. With more thorough knowledge of their patients over time, they felt they made important contributions to their patients' care, not only in providing emotional support but also in bridging gaps in the delivery of services and in motivating deeper exploration into relevant medical and social issues. Students reported that their connections with patients over time inspired a sense of idealism and advocacy. CONCLUSIONS: Organizing learning in the principal clinical year around longitudinal patient care seems to offer significant advantages for learning and professional development.

Longitudinal integrated clerkships for medical students: an innovation adopted by medical schools in Australia, Canada, South Africa, and the United States.

PURPOSE: Integrated clinical clerkships represent a relatively new and innovative approach to medical education that uses continuity as an organizing principle, thus increasing patient-centeredness and learner-centeredness. Medical schools are offering longitudinal integrated clinical clerkships in increasing numbers. This report collates the experiences of medical schools that use longitudinal integrated clerkships for medical student education in order to establish a clearer characterization of these experiences and summarize outcome data, when possible. METHOD: The authors sent an e-mail survey with open text responses to 17 medical schools with known longitudinal integrated clerkships. RESULTS: Sixteen schools in four countries on three continents responded to the survey. Fifteen institutions have active longitudinal integrated clerkships in place. Two programs began before 1995, but the others are newer. More than 2,700 students completed longitudinal integrated clerkships in these schools. The median clerkship length is 40 weeks, and in 15 of the schools, the core clinical content was in medicine, surgery, pediatrics, and obstetrics-gynecology. Eleven schools reported supportive student responses to the programs. No differences were noted in nationally normed exam scores between program participants and those in the traditional clerkships. Limited outcomes data suggest that students who participate in these programs are more likely to enter primary care careers. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents the increasing use of longitudinal integrated clerkships and provides initial insights for institutions that may wish to develop similar clinical programs. Further study will be needed to assess the long-term impact of these programs on medical education and workforce initiatives.

The Harvard Medical School-Cambridge integrated clerkship: an innovative model of clinical education.

The Harvard Medical School-Cambridge Integrated Clerkship (HMS-CIC) is a redesign of the principal clinical year to foster students' learning from close and continuous contact with cohorts of patients in the disciplines of internal medicine, neurology, obstetrics-gynecology, pediatrics, and psychiatry. With year-long mentoring, students follow their patients through major venues of care. Surgery and radiology also are taught longitudinally, grounded in the clinical experiences of a cohort of patients and in a brief immersion experience working directly with an attending surgeon. Students participate in weekly, case-based tutorials integrating instruction in the basic sciences with training to address the common and important issues in medicine, as identified by national organizations. In addition, they participate in a social science curriculum that focuses on self-reflection, communication skills, ethics, population sciences, and cultural competence. In the pilot year (July 2004 to July 2005), HMS-CIC students performed at least as well as traditional students in tests of content knowledge and skills, as measured by National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Subject Exams and the fourth-year Objective Structured Clinical Exam, and they scored higher on a year-end comprehensive clinical skills self-assessment examination, suggesting that they retained content knowledge better. From surveys, HMS-CIC students were much more likely to see patients before diagnosis and after discharge and to receive feedback and mentoring from experienced faculty than were their traditionally educated peers. HMS-CIC students expressed more satisfaction with their curriculum and felt better prepared to cope with the professional challenges of patient care, such as being truly caring, involving patients in decision making, and understanding how the social context affects their patients.