Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Tissue Eng Part A ; 24(7-8): 595-606, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28726546

ABSTRACT

While the influence of nanotopography on stem cell behavior has been extensively investigated on adult stem cells, far fewer studies have investigated the interaction of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with various nanotopographical patterns. The purpose of this study was to identify nanopatterns that can influence the stemness and proliferation, as well as the adhesive properties in iPSCs, and thereby explore the feasibility of applying these nano-features for regenerative medicine. Three kinds of nanopatterns were fabricated from polydimethylsiloxane membranes, irregular patterned membrane (IPM), groove patterned membrane (GPM), and postpatterned membrane (PPM), in addition to flat patterned membrane (FPM) which did not have any nanotopographic features and was used as the control pattern. On the surfaces of GPM or PPM, iPSCs showed tendency for aggregation and did not spread out well at passage 1. However, with continued passaging (P6, P10), the tendency to form aggregates was greatly reduced. While iPSCs cultured on GPM and PPM had low population doubling time values compared with FPM and IPM at P1, the differences disappeared in later passages. The expression of the cell proliferation marker Ki67 in iPSCs gradually decreased with continued passaging in cells cultured on FPM and IPM, but not in those cultured on GPM and PPM. The expression of Oct3/4 and Nanog, marker of stemness, was significantly higher on GPM and PPM than on FPM at P6 and P10. At P5, numerous filopodia were demonstrated in the peripheral attachments of iPSC colonies on FPM and IPM, while GPM and PPM generally had globular appearance. The expression of the focal adhesion (FA) molecules α-actinin, vinculin, phalloidin, or FA kinase was significantly greater on GPM and PPM than on FPM and IPM at P6 or P10. In conclusion, continued passaging on regular nanopatterns, including groove- and post-forms, was effective in maintaining an undifferentiated state and proliferation of iPSCs and also in increasing the expression of FA molecules.


Subject(s)
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/cytology , Blotting, Western , Cell Culture Techniques , Cell Differentiation/physiology , Cell Line , Cell Proliferation/physiology , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Microscopy, Atomic Force , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
2.
Biomaterials ; 33(21): 5206-20, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22541355

ABSTRACT

Embryonic stem (ES) cells can undergo continual proliferation and differentiation into cells of all somatic cell lineages in vitro; they are an unlimited cell source for regenerative medicine. However, techniques for maintaining undifferentiated ES cells are often inefficient and result in heterogeneous cell populations. Here, we determined effects of nanopattern polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) as a culture substrate in promoting the self-renewal of mouse ES (mES) cells, compared to commercial plastic culture dishes. After many passages, mES cells efficiently maintained their undifferentiated state on nanopattern PDMS, but randomly differentiated on commercial plastic culture dishes, as indicated by partially altered morphologies and decreases in alkaline phosphatase activity and stage-specific expression of embryonic antigen-1. Under nanopattern PDMS conditions, we found increased activities of STAT3 and Akt, important proteins involved in maintaining the self-renewal of mES cells. The substrate-cell interactions also enhanced leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)-downstream signaling and inhibited spontaneous differentiation, concomitant with reduced focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signaling. This reduction in FAK signaling was shown to be important for promoting mES cell self-renewal. Thus, our data demonstrates that nanopattern PDMS contributes to maintaining the self-renewal of mES cells and may be applicable in the large-scale production of homogeneously undifferentiated mES cells.


Subject(s)
Cell Culture Techniques/methods , Dimethylpolysiloxanes/pharmacology , Embryonic Stem Cells/cytology , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Animals , Cell Adhesion/drug effects , Cell Differentiation/drug effects , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cells, Cultured , Embryonic Stem Cells/drug effects , Embryonic Stem Cells/enzymology , Embryonic Stem Cells/ultrastructure , Focal Adhesion Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/metabolism , Focal Adhesions/drug effects , Focal Adhesions/metabolism , Leukemia Inhibitory Factor/metabolism , Mice , Nanoparticles/ultrastructure , Surface Properties/drug effects
3.
Anal Chem ; 81(8): 2832-9, 2009 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19298056

ABSTRACT

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is a powerful and widely applied technique for detecting association of individual proteins with specific genomic regions; the technique requires several complex steps and is tedious. In this paper, we develop a microbead-packed microfluidic chip which eliminates most of the laborious, time-consuming, and skill-dependent processes of the ChIP procedure. A computational fluid dynamics model was established to analyze fluidic behavior in a microbead-packed microchannel. With the use of the new chip, a ChIP procedure was performed to purify the GAPDH (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) gene from human embryonic kidney cells (cell line 293). The ChIP capability of the microfluidic chip was evaluated and compared with that of a commercial assay kit; the precipitation performance of both methods was almost identical as shown by quantitative measurement of DNA. However, our chip offers the advantage of low resin volume, and the experimental time is greatly reduced. In addition, our method is less dependent on individual technical skill. Therefore, we expect that our microfluidic chip-based ChIP method will be widely used in DNA-, gene-, and protein-related research and will improve experimental efficiency.


Subject(s)
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation/instrumentation , DNA/genetics , Microfluidic Analytical Techniques/methods , Antibodies/immunology , Antibody Specificity , Cell Line , Cross-Linking Reagents/chemistry , DNA/analysis , DNA/isolation & purification , DNA/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/immunology , Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (Phosphorylating)/genetics , Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (Phosphorylating)/isolation & purification , Histones/analysis , Histones/metabolism , Humans , Models, Chemical , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...