Cost-effectiveness analysis of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine versus 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in an adult population in South Korea.

In South Korea, the National Immunization Program offers a 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) for the elderly; however, the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) is not included, and vaccination is not offered to younger, at-risk populations. This study offers a comparative analysis of PCV13 and PPSV23 in Korea's adults, stratified by age and risk group. A Markov model with a lifetime horizon was developed from the healthcare perspective. Data sources included the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, Korea Centre for Disease Control & Prevention and Korean medical institutions. An expert panel tested data validity. The CAPiTA trial and Cochrane meta-analysis were used to obtain vaccine effectiveness data. Regardless of co-morbidity, when the sequential PCV13-PPSV23 strategy was compared to that using PPSV23-only, in elderly populations, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 3,300 USD per quality-adjusted life years (QALY). For the risk group aged ≥65 years, the ICER of the addition of PCV13 over the existing PPSV23-only strategy was 3,404 USD/QALY. However, on replacing PPSV23 with PCV13, for all elderly populations, an ICER of 1,421 USD/QALY resulted; for the risk group aged ≥65 years, the ICER was 1,736 USD/QALY. For the 18-64 year-old risk group, the sequential PCV13-PPSV23 strategy yielded an ICER of 3,629 USD/QALY over the PPSV23-only strategy, and 6,643 USD/QALY compared to no vaccination. Thus, the PCV13→PPSV23 combination strategy for elderly populations was found to be a cost-effective alternative to the current National Immunization Program regardless of co-morbidity. This finding was the same as that for younger, at-risk populations.

Two-year direct medical costs of stroke in Korea: a multi-centre incidence-based study from hospital perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing socio-economic burden of stroke, few studies have investigated the costs associated with the stroke care in Korea. We estimated the two-year direct medical costs associated with stroke. METHODS: This was a multi-centre, incidence-based, retrospective observational study. We examined the records of all adult patients who were admitted in eight large hospitals throughout Korea due to acute stroke [I60: sub-arachnoid haemorrhage; I61: intracerebral haemorrhage; I62: other nontraumatic haemorrhage; I63: cerebral infarction, by The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD)-10] between 1 November and 31 December 2006. Direct medical inpatient and outpatient cost of each patient was extracted from the medical record and the reimbursement claim data of the hospital. RESULTS: Out of 908 studied patients (14% diagnosed as I60, 18% as I61, 3% as I62, and 65% as I63), 460 (50.7%) were assessed for more than one-year. The annual average direct medical costs were Korean 8,114,471 US$8732) for the first year, and Korean 431,527 for the second year. The first year costs for haemorrhagic stroke (I60-I62) (Korean 13,090,179) were significantly higher than those associated with cerebral infarction (I63) (Korean 5,460,459), whereas the second year costs were not different. Factors independently associated with high cost were female gender, young age, and first stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Direct medical costs for stroke in Korea were determined, which seem to be lower than those of other developed countries. Female gender, young age, and first stroke were factors related to higher stroke cost.