Effects of depression on medication adherence in HIV/AIDS patients: Korea HIV/AIDS cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The number of people with HIV/AIDS has consistently increased in Korea since the first case of HIV/AIDS infection was reported in 1985. The depressive symptoms of patients with HIV/AIDS may lead to medication non-adherence. This study sought to investigate the cross-sectional and longitudinal association between depression and antiretroviral treatment adherence in the Korean HIV/AIDS population. METHODS: We included participants of the Korea HIV/AIDS cohort study between 2009 and 2017. All information was collected at the enrollment and every annual visit, including sociodemographic characteristics, health-related behaviors, HIV/AIDS infection-related factors, depression score, and frequency of skipped medication. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 601 participants registered between 2009 and 2017. Longitudinal data were evaluated by panel regression analysis in 515 patients who registered from 2009 to 2013. RESULTS: In cross-sectional analysis, the HIV/AIDS patients with depressive symptoms were more likely to be non-adherent (adjusted OR = 0.52, 95 % CI 0.34, 0.79, p = 0.002). Medication adherence was significantly associated with a health-related lifestyle; the adjusted odds ratio of the non-smoking and non-drinking group was 1.75 (95 % CI 1.05, 2.90, p = 0.031). The longitudinal panel regression model revealed a significant negative impact of depression on medication adherence (adjusted OR = 0.50, 95 % CI 0.30, 0.84, p = 0.009). Non-smoking and non-drinking participants were 2.31 times more likely to adhere to antiretroviral treatment (95 % CI 1.29, 4.15, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our finding of depression and lifestyle modifications being significant contributors underscore the importance of proactive interventions to optimize the treatment outcomes of PLWH.

Effect of single tablet regimen on prescription trends for treatment-naïve patients with HIV/AIDS in Korea.

Single-tablet regimens (STRs) should be considered for patients with HIV/AIDS to increase medication compliance and improve clinical outcomes. This study compared variations in the prescription trends between STRs and multiple-tablet regimens (MTRs) for treatment-naïve patients with HIV/AIDS after the approval of the new STRs, a proxy indicator for improvement in medication adherence. The medical and pharmacy claim data were retrospectively obtained from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment service, which contains basic information on the patients' sociodemographic characteristics and treatment information for the entire Korean population. From 2013 to 2018, a total of 6737 patients with HIV/AIDS were included. Most patients were men (92.8%, n = 6251) and insured through the National Health Insurance (95.1%, n = 6410). The mean number of pills in their antiretroviral treatment regimens decreased from 2.8 ± 1.2 in 2013 to 1.2 ± 1.0 in 2018. After the first STR (EVG/c/TDF/FTC) was approved in 2014, prescription transitions from MTR to STR were observed among more than 38% of patients. In 2018, most treatment-naïve patients were prescribed STRs (91.2%). There was a time lag for STR prescription trends in non-metropolitan hospitals compared with those in metropolitan cities. Our data provide a valuable perspective for evaluating ART regimen prescription patterns on a national scale.

A comparison of medication adherence and viral suppression in antiretroviral treatment-naïve patients with HIV/AIDS depending on the drug formulary.

Antiretroviral treatment (ART) adherence is highlighted in management of patients living with human immunodeficiency virus. In South Korea, ART medication research has rarely been conducted due to the low economic burden associated with government-funded treatment. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the pill burden impact between ART regimen compliance and HIV-RNA viral load suppression. Data were collected from 2008 to 2016 at a general hospital in South Korea. A total of 210 HIV/AIDS treatment-naïve patients were grouped as follows: single-tablet regimen (STR, one tablet/day), mild pill burden (two-four tablets/day), and heavy pill burden (≥ five tablets/day). Patients were analyzed according to gender, age at index date, medical insurance type, comorbidities, depression, HIV/AIDS disease burden as indicated by HIV-RNA viral load and CD4, and laboratory variables. In a multivariate logistic regression model, the STR group demonstrated adherence 5.10 times more often than the heavy pill burden group. Females and patients with an initial viral load of 500,000 or more were 0.090- and 0.040-fold less adherent to the ART regimen. Among these patients, 95% or more of the MPR group were 7.38 times more likely to have a lower limit of detection (LLOD) of viral load suppression. The highest initial viral load group was 0.090-fold less likely to have an LLOD than the reference group. These results suggest that a single-tablet regimen could improve medication adherence and the clinical virologic outcome. Therefore, general population research on ART adherence and polypharmacy is needed.

Development and validation of the Korean version of the medication regimen complexity index.

The medication regimen complexity index (MRCI), originally developed in English, is a reliable and valid tool to assess the complexity of pharmacotherapy. This study aimed to validate the Korean version of MRCI (MRCI-K). A cross-cultural methodological study comprising 335 discharged patients of a tertiary hospital in Korea was conducted. The translation process included translation into Korean by two clinical pharmacists, back translation by two native speakers, and a pretest of the tool, culminating in the Korean version of MRCI-K. Reliability analysis was assessed using inter-rater and test-retest reliability with 25 randomly selected patients. Convergent and discriminant validity analyses were conducted by correlating MRCI scores with medication number, age, sex, adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports, and length of stay. The criterion validity was confirmed through evaluation by a nine-member expert panel that subjectively ranked these regimens. The reliability analysis demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.977), and the intraclass correlation coefficient exceeded 0.90 for all cases. The correlation coefficient for the number of medications was 0.955 (P < 0.001). Weak significant correlations were observed with age and length of stay. The MRCI-K group with ADR reports scored higher (mean, 31.8) than the group without ADR reports (mean, 27.3). The expert panel's ranking had a stronger correlation with the MRCI ranking than the medication number ranking. MRCI-K has similar reliability and validity as MRCI and is useful for analyzing therapeutic regimens with potential applications in both practice and research in Korea.