Coffee consumption is associated with lower serum aminotransferases in the general Korean population and in those at high risk for hepatic disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The favourable effects of coffee on liver enzymes have been reported worldwide. This study investigated the association between coffee consumption and serum aminotransferase concentration in Korean adults. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Data were obtained from the fourth and fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) concentration were defined as >30 IU/L for men and >19 IU/L for women. The risk of elevated ALT and AST according to general characteristics and frequency of coffee consumption were tested by chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The prevalence of elevated ALT was 27.4%, 27.8%, and 26.9% in subjects who drank <1, 1, and >=2 times/day, respectively. The proportions of individuals with elevated AST were 32.5%, 33.1%, and 26.7% in subjects who drank <1, 1, and >=2 times/day, respectively. The aORs for elevated ALT and AST were significantly lower in subjects who drank >=2 times of coffee/day than in those who drank <1 time/day (ALT: aOR=0.86, 95% CI=0.79-0.94; AST: aOR=0.83, 95% CI=0.76-0.91). In subgroup analysis, consumption of >=2 times/day was associated with lower ORs for elevated ALT in the high-risk group overall and in the viral hepatitis and obesity subgroups, respectively. In sensitivity analysis, reduced frequency of coffee consumption was associated with an increased risk for elevated liver enzymes, although an association between coffee consumption and elevated ALT was not observed in women or current smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Higher coffee consumption was associated with lower risk of elevated aminotransferase concentration in Korean adults.

The Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency among Cancer Survivors in a Nationwide Survey of the Korean Population.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that inadequate vitamin D levels are associated with a poor cancer prognosis, but data regarding actual vitamin D levels in cancer survivors are limited. This study investigated the vitamin D levels and prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among Korean cancer survivors compared with non-cancer controls, and identified the factors associated with vitamin D deficiency. METHODS: Using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), 915 cancer survivors and 29,694 controls without a history of cancer were selected. Serum 25(OH)D levels were measured; vitamin D deficiency was defined as 25(OH)D levels less than 20 ng/mL. Chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and associated factors. RESULTS: Vitamin D deficiency was observed in 62.7% of cancer survivors and 67.1% of controls. Among cancer survivors, vitamin D deficiency was most prevalent among 19-44 year olds (76.2%) and among managers, professionals, and related workers (79.3%). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that younger cancer survivors and those who work indoors were predisposed to vitamin D deficiency. CONCLUSION: Vitamin D deficiency was prevalent among both cancer survivors and controls in Korea. The regular evaluation and management of vitamin D levels is needed for both bone health and general health in cancer survivors.

Assessing activity limitation among cancer survivors in Korea using data from a nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND: More than 1 million cancer survivors reside in Korea. We here investigated activity limitations of cancer survivors compared to controls without a history of cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the 4th and 5th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007-2012) data, we identified 1,155 adult cancer survivors. Activity limitations were defined as limitation in activities of daily living, experience of lying in a sickbed, and number of days lying in a sickbed during the last month. Descriptive analysis and multiple logistic regression compared these measures for survivors and controls by sex and age groups. RESULTS: Approximately 29.4% of cancer survivors reported limitation in activities of daily living, 14.6% experienced lying in a sickbed, and 4.3% experienced more than 15 days lying in a sickbed during the last month. After controlling for demographic and health-related factors, cancer survivors were more likely to report activity limitation than controls. The associations were similar across sex and age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors have increased activity limitation compared to controls and these limitations persist across sex and age. Targeted interventions and improved management are essential for improving cancer survivor daily life.

Family history and survival of patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have generated conflicting evidence regarding associations between family history and survival after gastric cancer surgery. In this study, we investigated this question using a meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To identify relevant studies, PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to June 2013. Two reviewers independently assessed search results and data extraction of included studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) were calculated based on fixed- or random- effects models. Homogeneity of effects across studies was assessed using x2 test statistics and quantified by I2. RESULTS: A total of five studies were selected according to the inclusion criteria. The total number of patients included was 2,030, which ranged from 145 to 598 per study. There was no significant difference in OS by family history of cancer (HR=0.83, 95%CIs=0.50-1.38), but subgroup analysis of patients with a first-degree family history of cancer (HR=0.74, 95%CIs=0.60-0.93) and gastric cancer family history (HR=0.56, 95%CIs=0.41-0.76) tended to show better OS in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that a first-degree family history of cancer or gastric cancer family history is associated with better survival of gastric cancer patients after surgery, after a systematic review of five previous studies. These results can be applied by clinicians when counselling patients regarding their risk of death from gastric cancer. Further study is needed to investigate the underlying mechanism between family history and survival in gastric cancer patients.

Health-related quality of life among cancer survivors in Korea: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the quality of life among cancer survivors compared with individuals without a history of cancer (noncancer controls) using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. METHODS: The study subjects were 783 adult cancer survivors and 36 456 noncancer controls who participated in the third, fourth and fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Demographic factors, health-related behavior, clinical characteristics and health-related quality of life were assessed with self-reported questionnaires. The EuroQoL-5Dimension was used to evaluate health-related quality of life. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis were used to compare health-related quality of life between cancer survivors and noncancer controls. RESULTS: About 67% were women and the mean age of the cancer survivors was 60.9 ± 12.4 years. About 52% of survivors were diagnosed with cancer between 45 and 64 years, and more than half of cancer survivors were diagnosed 5 years or less before the interview. The pain/discomfort dimension was the highest reported problem: 43.6% for cancer survivors. The proportion of any reported problem was significantly higher among cancer survivors compared with noncancer controls in terms of mobility (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.56, 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.97), usual activities (aOR, 1.45, 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.89), pain/discomfort (aOR, 1.26, 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.52) and anxiety/depression (aOR, 1.61, 95% confidence interval, 1.29-2.01). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors had a significantly lower quality of life compared with noncancer controls. The pain/discomfort dimension was the highest reported problem in cancer survivors.

Health behaviors of cancer survivors: the Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV, 2007-09).

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the health behaviors of cancer survivors in the Republic of Korea and to compare them with the health behaviors of two control groups: (i) individuals with no history of cancer but with other chronic diseases and (ii) individuals with no history of cancer or other chronic diseases. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of 17 311 adults at least 19 years of age who participated in the Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007-09). Smoking, alcohol drinking, physical activity and cancer screening behaviors of cancer survivors were assessed and compared with those of the two control groups. χ(2) tests and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the likelihood and predictors of health behaviors. RESULTS: The proportion of cancer survivors who were current smokers, heavy drinkers and engaged in physical activity were 9.6, 6.6 and 26.0%, respectively. Cancer screening rates reported among survivors were 44.2, 17.0, 49.8 and 47.7% for stomach, colorectal, breast and cervical cancers, respectively. Cancer survivors showed lower smoking and alcohol drinking rates compared with both control groups after adjusting for sex, age, marital status, education, household income and health insurance. Cancer survivors also showed stomach, breast and cervical cancer screening rates that differed from both control groups. However, in multiple analyses, these differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors are more likely to adopt good health behaviors than individuals without a history of cancer. Further study is needed to determine the factors that lead to continued unhealthy behaviors after cancer diagnosis.

Association of smoking history with cancer recurrence and survival in stage III-IV male gastric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Smoking and drinking alcohol are major risk factors for cancer development, and we investigated their effects on gastric cancer prognosis following initial resection. METHODS: Data from male patients with stage III-IV gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery between 2001 and 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were followed up until 2011. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards regressions were applied for survival rates. RESULTS: Among 238 patients, 151 (63.4%) smoked and 146 (61.3%) drank alcohol. Current smokers had an increased risk of cancer recurrence or death from any cause [adjusted HR (aHR), 1.94; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-3.21], cancer recurrence (aHR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.12-3.21), and overall mortality (aHR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.23-3.73) compared with never-smokers. Patients with a lifetime cigarette smoking of <40 and ≥ 40 pack-years had increased cancer recurrence or death from any cause (aHR, 1.72 and 2.43, respectively; 95% CI, 1.03-2.86 and 1.38-4.30, respectively), cancer recurrence (aHR, 1.63 and 2.61, respectively; 95% CI, 0.95-2.79 and 1.43-4.77, respectively), and overall mortality (aHR, 1.92 and 2.75, respectively; 95% CI, 1.09-3.38 and 1.47-5.12, respectively) compared with never-smokers. However, drinking alcohol was not associated with postsurgery survival. CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette-smoking history at the time of diagnosis, but not drinking history, is associated with cancer recurrence and poor survival after surgery in male patients with stage III-IV gastric cancer. IMPACT: These findings encourage physicians to advise patients with gastric cancer to stop smoking to obtain a general health benefit and likely improvement in the gastric cancer course.

Association of family history with cancer recurrence and survival in patients with gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Family history of gastric cancer is a major risk factor for the disease. In this study, we investigated the prognoses of patients with gastric cancer with a family history. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 1,273 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who had undergone gastrectomy between 2001 and 2005 at a tertiary cancer center hospital. A positive family history was defined as a self-reported history of cancer in first- or second-degree relatives. Patients were followed up until December 2009 for death or recurrence. Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared by family history. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards regressions were applied for disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 1,273 patients, 263 patients (20.6%) had first-degree relatives with a history of gastric cancer. First-degree family history of gastric cancer was associated with better DFS, RFS, and OS (P = .012, .006, and .005, respectively). In patients with stage I or II gastric cancer, first-degree family history was not associated with survival. However, it was associated with a reduced risk of recurrence or mortality in patients with stage III or IV gastric cancer. Compared with patients without a family history, the adjusted hazard ratios for those with a first-degree family history of gastric cancer were 0.49 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.84) for DFS, 0.51 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.87) for RFS, and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.84) for OS in patients with stage III or IV gastric cancer. CONCLUSION: A first-degree family history of gastric cancer is associated with improved survival after curative-intent surgery in patients with stage III or IV gastric cancer.