Outcomes in Organ Transplant Recipients With Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Few data exist in the literature regarding outcomes of men with prostate cancer (CaP) who are receiving immunosuppression from prior organ transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate biochemical disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity in patients with organ transplants who were later treated with definitive radiotherapy for CaP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our institutional CaP registry was reviewed to identify patients who had undergone an organ transplantation before CaP diagnosis. Between 1999 and 2013, a total of 28 organ transplant recipients treated with definitive radiotherapy for CaP were identified. Treatment consisted of either I-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy or external-beam radiotherapy. All patients were receiving immunosuppressive medications. RESULTS: The median age was 66 years. Median follow-up time was 30 months. Twenty-four patients (86%) were treated with brachytherapy, and 4 patients (14%) were treated with external-beam radiotherapy. Nine patients (32%) had low-risk CaP, 14 (50%) had intermediate-risk CaP, and 5 (18%) had high-risk CaP. At the time of last follow-up, 2 patients had died, 1 from metastatic CaP and 1 from other causes. The 3-year biochemical disease-free survival was 95.8%. The 3-year distant metastasis-free survival was 93.1%. The 3-year overall survival was 93.8%. One patient developed grade 3 late gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSION: This represents one of the largest reported series of outcomes in patients with organ transplantation and CaP. Organ transplant recipients treated with prostate radiotherapy have excellent 3-year outcomes.

Isolated Nodal Failure after Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer: The Role for Salvage Mediastinal Radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Isolated nodal failure (INF) without synchronous local or distant failure is an uncommon occurrence after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung cancer. Here we review the natural history and patterns of failure after post-SBRT INF with or without salvage mediastinal radiotherapy (SvRT). METHODS: Patients treated with SBRT for non-small cell lung cancer with definitive intent were identified. Patients who experienced hilar or mediastinal INF without synchronous distant, lobar, or local failure were included and grouped according to the use of SvRT. The rates of subsequent locoregional control, distant metastases, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival were assessed. RESULTS: Of 797 patients treated with definitive SBRT, 24 (3%) experienced INF and 15 (63%) received SvRT. The most common SvRT regimen (53%) was 45 Gy in 15 fractions. The median follow-up after INF was 11.3 months for survivors. There were no grade 3 or higher toxicities after SvRT. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier PFS and overall survival estimates were 33% and 56% for patients not receiving radiotherapy and 75% and 73% with SvRT. After SvRT, the rate of locoregional control at 1 year was 84.4%. Crude rates of distant failure were 20.0% with SvRT and 22.2% with no radiotherapy. Of the 13 deaths observed, five (38%) were related to distant progression of lung cancer, four (31%) to comorbidities, three (23%) to mediastinal progression, and one (8%) to an unknown cause. CONCLUSIONS: INF is uncommon after SBRT. Despite the significant comorbidities of this population, intrathoracic progression remains a contributor to morbidity and mortality. SVRT for INF is well tolerated and may improve PFS.

The impact of pretreatment prostate volume on severe acute genitourinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of pretreatment prostate volume on the development of severe acute genitourinary toxicity in patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2004 and 2007, a consecutive sample of 214 patients who underwent IMRT (75.6 Gy) for prostate cancer at two referral centers was analyzed. Prostate volumes were obtained from computed tomography scans taken during treatment simulation. Genitourinary toxicity was defined using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 guidelines. Acute toxicity was defined as any toxicity originating within 90 days of the completion of radiation therapy. Patients were characterized as having a small or large prostate depending on whether their prostate volume was less than or greater than 50 cm(3), respectively. Genitourinary toxicity was compared in these groups using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to further assess the impact of prostate volume on severe (Grade 3) acute genitourinary toxicity. RESULTS: Patients with large prostates (>50 cm(3)) had a higher rate of acute Grade 3 genitourinary toxicity (p = .02). Prostate volume was predictive of the likelihood of developing acute Grade 3 genitourinary toxicity on bivariate (p = .004) and multivariate (p = .006) logistic regression. Every 27.0 cm(3) increase in prostate volume doubled the likelihood of acute Grade 3 genitourinary toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with larger prostates are at higher risk for the development of severe acute genitourinary toxicity when treated with IMRT for prostate cancer.