Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl ; 31(3): 655-675, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32655052

ABSTRACT

Screening for cardiovascular (CV) disease before transplant is common. However, the clinical utility of screening asymptomatic transplant candidates remains unclear. There is a large degree of variation among the practices of the different transplant centers in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and among the international guidelines. Opinions are mostly based on mixed observational data with a great potential for bias. When compared to the Western countries, renal-transplant candidates in the KSA are likely to have longer dialysis vintage, higher prevalence of catheter use, higher rate of uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism, and high prevalence of diabetes. These factors are likely to expose renal-transplant candidates to a higher CV risk than those in Western countries. In the absence of any published guideline for CV risk assessment of the renal-transplant candidate in the KSA, we present these guidelines as the first published guidelines in the KSA. These guidelines review the pertinent aspects from the most recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for cardiac disease evaluation and management among kidney-transplant candidates and reflect on the local practices in the KSA. These guidelines overview many of the daily- encountered challenges in renal transplantation such as the indications for stress testing, screening coronary angiogram and prophylactic revascularization, screening and management of pulmonary hypertension, cardiac surveillance while on the waiting list and duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy before renal transplant. These guidelines were reviewed by a team of consultant nephrologists, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, and transplant surgeons from six major transplant centers in the KSA. The guidelines aim to standardize the practices of CV risk assessment in kidney transplantation in the KSA, according to the most up-to-date available evidence. The expected impact of these guidelines on the current practices is also reviewed here.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Kidney Transplantation , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Consensus , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Kidney Transplantation/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prognosis , Saudi Arabia
2.
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl ; 30(2): 359-364, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31031372

ABSTRACT

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers life to patients with end-stage liver disease. The balance between the benefit to the recipient and the risk to the donor plays a central role in justifying LDLT. However, the incidence rates of complications posttransplant differ widely. This study is designed to identify postoperative complications in LDLT in a tertiary care center King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC). This was a retrospective cohort study. All donors at KAMC between January 2003 and December 2015 were reviewed through a hospital database and patient charts to determine the postoperative complications based on the modified Clavien classification system. All donors were relatives of the recipients and assessed before the surgery. A total of 101 donors underwent LDLT: 75 were male and 26 were female, with a mean age of 27.7 ± 6.6. The breakdown of specific surgical procedures was as follows: 65 (64.3%) donors underwent right hepatic lobectomy, 31 (30.6%) underwent left lateral hepatectomy, three (2.97%) underwent extended right hepatectomy with the inclusion of the middle hepatic vein, and two (1.98%) underwent left hepatectomy. Postoperative complications were determined in 20 patients (19.8%), but no mortality was observed. Complications were reported in 14 (21.5%) right and six (19.4%) left lateral hepatectomy donors. A total of 12 patients had Grade I complications, six patients had Grade II complications, and Grade III complications were reported in two cases. The most frequent complications were upper limb weakness to brachial plexus neuropathy and mild bile leak. Life-threatening complications in our center have not been reported in LDLT; however, some donors may experience postoperative morbidity, which usually were mild and had a good prognosis.


Subject(s)
Hepatectomy/adverse effects , Hepatectomy/methods , Liver Transplantation , Living Donors , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Adult , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Brachial Plexus Neuropathies/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Muscle Weakness/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Saudi Arabia , Young Adult
3.
Middle East J Anaesthesiol ; 23(5): 549-55, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27487641

ABSTRACT

Combined liver and kidney transplantation is a highly demanding and challenging procedure for anesthesiologists due to the lengthy and complicated nature of the procedure, the critical patient condition and the need to balance the intravascular volume to maintain the venous outflow of the hepatic allograft and also the diuresis of the renal allograft. Intravascular volume management and coagulation control, seem to be the most important issues during combined liver and kidney transplantation. There is sparsity of data in the literature concerning the anesthetic and fluid management in CLKT. We present and discuss the anesthetic management in a case series in three patients, who underwent combined liver and kidney transplantation in our institution during the last two years.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/methods , Kidney Transplantation , Liver Transplantation , Adult , Blood Coagulation Factors/therapeutic use , Central Venous Pressure , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...