Bidirectional, longitudinal associations between chronic pain and family functioning in youth with spina bifida.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain does not reside within an individual. Pain is affected by and affects larger systems (e.g., families). We examined longitudinal, bidirectional associations between chronic pain and family functioning in spina bifida (SB). We hypothesized a bidirectional association between pain and family functioning (cohesion and conflict); youth chronic pain status would be associated with maladaptive family functioning and maladaptive family functioning would be associated with youth chronic pain status. METHOD: Participants were from an ongoing longitudinal study of adolescents with SB (N = 140, 53.6% female, ages 8-15 at Time 1). Data were collected every 2 years, with this study using data from Times 1 and 2 (T1, T2; T1: 2006-2009, T2: 2008-2011). Parents reported on youth demographics and family functioning. Youth reported on family functioning and pain; pain was dichotomized into a categorical variable (chronic pain vs. no chronic pain). Family functioning (cohesion and conflict) was also assessed using observational data. RESULTS: Youth chronic pain status was associated with decreased family conflict (child report) and increased cohesion (parent report) over time. Increased family conflict (parent report) was associated with a greater likelihood of reporting chronic pain 2 years later. Findings were nonsignificant between observed family conflict or cohesion and chronic pain in either direction. DISCUSSION: With the presence of an additional stressor (chronic pain) families increase cohesion and reduce conflict. Increased conflict may increase a child's vulnerability of developing chronic pain. It is critical that interventions for both pain and family functioning in SB are guided by a strengths-based model. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Stress and Coping in Youth With Spina Bifida: A Brief Longitudinal Study in a Summer Camp Setting.

INTRODUCTION: It is well established that youth with chronic conditions experience elevated levels of stress; the manner in which they respond to or cope with this stress is likely to impact both health and psychosocial outcomes. The current study examined stress and coping in youth and young adults with spina bifida (SB) using the response to stress questionnaire-SB version (RSQ-SB; Connor-Smith et al., 2000). METHODS: Data were collected as part of a camp-based psychosocial intervention for children (ages 7-13), adolescents (ages 14-19), and young adults (ages 20-38) with SB. Participants completed the RSQ-SB as well as questionnaires assessing demographics and condition severity. Data were collected prior to camp (T1) and 1 month (T2) after camp ended. Self-report data were collected from adolescents and young adults; parents of children and adolescents reported on their child's stress and coping. Ratios of primary control coping, secondary control coping, disengagement coping, involuntary engagement, and involuntary disengagement coping were calculated. Descriptive statistics and t-tests were utilized to describe coping and stress responses and to determine potential change over time. T-tests were also used to compare youth and parent reported coping styles with those of youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and sickle cell disease (SCD). Associations between demographic/disease factors and coping styles were also examined. RESULTS: Parent and youth report indicated that youth with SB tend to use primary control coping. Youth with SB use more primary control coping and less disengagement coping compared to youth with SCD and youth with T1D. Few significant changes in coping were found between T1 and T2. IQ and socioeconomic status were significantly associated with coping styles. CONCLUSION: Youth with SB use more primary control coping compared to other coping methods and as compared to other pediatric populations. Future studies should examine mechanisms by which primary control coping is advantageous for youth with SB. Future interventions should be more focused on promoting adaptive coping behaviors and be tailored to developmental age and access to resources.

A Systematic Review of Benefit-Finding and Growth in Pediatric Medical Populations.

OBJECTIVE: This review synthesizes the literature on benefit-finding and growth (BFG) among youth with medical illnesses and disabilities and their parents. Specifically, we summarized: (a) methods for assessing BFG; (b) personal characteristics, personal, and environmental resources, as well as positive outcomes, associated with BFG; (c) interventions that have enhanced BFG; and (d) the quality of the literature. METHODS: A medical research librarian conducted the search across PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. Studies on BFG among children ages 0-18 with chronic illnesses and disabilities, or the parents of these youth were eligible for inclusion. Articles were uploaded into Covidence; all articles were screened by two reviewers, who then extracted data (e.g., study characteristics and findings related to BFG) independently and in duplicate for each eligible study. The review was based on a systematic narrative synthesis framework and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020189339). RESULTS: In total, 110 articles were included in this review. Generally, BFG capabilities were present across a range of pediatric health conditions and disabilities. Correlates of both youth and parent BFG are presented, including personal and environmental resources, coping resources, and positive outcomes. In addition, studies describing interventions aimed at enhancing BFG are discussed, and a quality assessment of the included studies is provided. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations are provided regarding how to assess BFG and with whom to study BFG to diversify and extend our current literature.

Technology usage and barriers to the use of behavioral intervention technologies in adolescents and young adults with spina bifida.

PURPOSE: The majority of behavioral intervention technologies (BITs) have been designed and targeted towards the general population (i.e., typically-developing individuals); thus, little is known about the use of BITs to aid those with special needs, such as youth with disabilities. The current study assessed adolescents and young adults with spina bifida (AYA-SB) for: 1) their technology usage, and 2) anticipated barriers to using technology to help manage their health. METHODS: AYA-SB completed a survey of their media and technology usage. A card sorting task that ranked and grouped anticipated barriers to using a mobile app to manage health was also completed. Ranked means, standard deviations, and the number of times a barrier was discarded were used to interpret sample rankings. RESULTS: AYA-SB reported less frequent technology and media use than the general population. However, differences emerged by age, with young adults endorsing higher usage than their younger counterparts. Top concerns focused on usability, accessibility, safety, personal barriers due to lack of engagement, technological functioning, privacy, and efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: AYA-SB appear to be selective users of technology. It is therefore critical that the design of BITs address their concerns, specifically aiming to have high usability, accessibility, and engagement.

Longitudinal Associations Between Pain and Psychosocial Adjustment in Youth With Spina Bifida.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined: (a) the nature and prevalence of pain in youth with spina bifida (SB) (b) common coping responses to pain, and (c) longitudinal, bi-directional associations between internalizing symptoms and pain characteristics. METHODS: Data were collected from youth (N = 140, 53.6% female, ages 8-15 at Time 1) and their parents and teachers at two time points spaced 2 years apart. Youth reported on several pain characteristics and coping responses. Multiple informants reported on child internalizing symptoms. Evaluation of Aims 1-3 was based on descriptive analyses, bivariate correlations, and linear and logistic regressions. RESULTS: About 25% of the sample reported chronic pain (e.g., experiencing pain one or more times per week over the past 3 months) at Time 1 or 2, with roughly one-third of this chronic pain subsample reporting chronic pain both time points. Pain was usually rated as mild in intensity for the full sample and most commonly experienced in the head, abdomen, and back, and described as "aching." Youth with chronic pain reported significantly higher pain intensity and tended to use condition-specific methods to cope with pain (e.g., taking off braces). In 2 of 10 analyses, internalizing symptoms at Time 1 were associated with chronic pain and pain intensity at Time 2. CONCLUSIONS: Roughly one-fourth of youth with SB are at risk for experiencing chronic pain, highlighting the need for increased assessment and treatment of pain in this population. Youth psychological functioning appears to more often precede, rather than being a consequence of pain symptoms.

Development of an Observational Parental Scaffolding Measure for Youth with Spina Bifida.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability and validity of a new observational measure of parental scaffolding, as well as the impact of parental scaffolding on academic and social outcomes among youth with spina bifida (SB). METHODS: As part of a larger study, 137 families of youth with SB participated in family interaction tasks and self-report questionnaires at the baseline assessment. Teachers also reported on youth's academic independence and competence, as well as social skills. Guided by previous research and theoretical formulations, a rational approach to measure development was employed whereby maternal and paternal scaffolding composites were created using the Family Interaction Macro-coding System (Holmbeck, Zebracki, Johnson, Belvedere, & Hommeyer (2007). Parent-child interaction macro-coding manual. Unpublished coding system. Chicago: Loyola University Chicago). RESULTS: The scaffolding measure demonstrated acceptable interrater and scale reliabilities. Additionally, both the maternal and paternal scaffolding composites were significantly associated with scores from self-report questionnaires of parenting behaviors in the expected directions. Maternal scaffolding was positively associated with IQ, academic competence, academic independence, and social self-control in youth with SB, whereas paternal scaffolding was positively associated with social cooperation and social self-control. Differences in scaffolding emerged between mothers and fathers, as well as across demographic variables. CONCLUSION: Initial findings support the use of the scaffolding measure. Future research should continue to examine the utility of this scaffolding measure in families of youth with SB.

Pathways by which Maternal Factors are Associated With Youth Spina Bifida-Related Responsibility.

OBJECTIVE: Achieving condition-related autonomy is an important developmental milestone for youth with spina bifida (SB). However, the transfer of condition-related responsibility to these youth can be delayed due to parent factors. This study aimed to investigate two potential pathways by which maternal factors may be associated with condition-related responsibility among youth with SB: (a) Maternal adjustment → perception of child vulnerability (PPCV) → youth condition-related responsibility; and (b) Maternal PPCV → overprotection → youth condition-related responsibility. METHODS: Participating youth with SB (N = 140; Mage=11.4 years, range = 8-15 years) were recruited as part of a longitudinal study; data from three time points (each spaced 2 years apart) from the larger study were used. Mothers reported on personal adjustment factors, PPCV, and overprotection. An observational measure of overprotection was also included. Mothers, fathers, and youth with SB reported on youths' degree of responsibility for condition-related tasks. Analyses included age, lesion level, IQ, and the dependent variables at the prior wave as covariates. RESULTS: Bootstrapped mediation analyses revealed that PPCV significantly mediated the relationship between maternal distress and youth responsibility for medical tasks such that higher levels of distress at Time 1 predicted higher levels of PPCV at Time 2 and lower youth medical responsibility at Time 3. Furthermore, self-reported maternal overprotection significantly mediated the relationship between maternal PPCV and youth responsibility for medical tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal personal distress, PPCV, and self-reported overprotection are interrelated and affect youth's condition-related responsibility. Interventions for mothers of youth with SB that target these factors may improve both maternal and youth outcomes.

A Systematic Review of Behavioral Intervention Technologies for Youth With Chronic Health Conditions and Physical and Intellectual Disabilities: Implications for Adolescents and Young Adults With Spina Bifida.

OBJECTIVE: Behavioral intervention technologies (BITs) stand as a promising delivery mechanism that overcomes multiple condition-specific and access barriers for self-management interventions for adolescents and young adults with spina bifida (AYA-SB). The purpose of the current review was to synthesize the behavioral and self-management intervention literature in conditions that have overlapping symptoms with youth with SB and to develop a model of likely user needs for AYA-SB that promotes self-management. METHOD: The search strategy was conducted by a medical research librarian in the following databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Elsevier), PsycINFO (EbscoHost), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), and Web of Science (Thomson Reuters) databases. The review was based on a systematic narrative synthesis framework and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (registration number CRD42018092342). RESULTS: In total, 18 articles were included in the current BIT review. The majority of included studies (1) targeted the management of chronic health conditions, (2) were informed by evidence-based approaches, (3) relied on content delivery, (4) were Web-based, (5) used linear or user-driven workflows, (6) included professional human support, and (7) included a control condition. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the evaluated BITs resulted in acceptable usage and maintained or improved targeted symptoms. A user needs model for AYA-SB is proposed with the intention that future research will promote further refinement and ultimate deployment of a BIT for AYA-SB to promote self-management.

Cultural Considerations for Autonomy and Medical Adherence in a Young Palestinian American Muslim Female With Spina Bifida: A Longitudinal Case Study in a Research Context.

This case study examines the unique presentation of a young Palestinian-American Muslim female, who is a part of an ongoing longitudinal study examining family and peer relationships, psychological adjustment, and neuropsychological functioning in youth with spina bifida. Throughout ten years of data collection, Palestinian-Arab culture and Islamic faith have consistently emerged as important factors that can be considered when interpreting this participant's general level of autonomy, medical autonomy, medical adherence, and psychological adjustment. This case study examines important aspects of adaptive and independent functioning for youth with spina bifida and how this family's culture interacts with these different domains of functioning. Moreover, it explores potential conflicts between an Arab collectivist family structure and Western biomedical ethics and suggests how clinicians might navigate these conflicts and bolster culturally-rooted strengths of families and patients from non-Western backgrounds.