Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Med ; 13(16)2024 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39200887

ABSTRACT

Background: The incidence of lymphomatous involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) has been increasing in recent years. However, the rarity of the disease has resulted in a scarcity of available data regarding its clinical presentation, natural history, and prognosis. We aimed to investigate the neurological characteristics of uncommon lymphomatous involvements confined to the CNS and to identify key variables that could serve as predictive biomarkers for treatment outcomes. Methods: We identified patients presenting with neurological symptoms and diagnosed with CNS-restricted lymphomatous involvement between 2005 and 2023. Results: We identified 44 cases, 93% of which were diagnosed with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and 7% with intravascular lymphoma. The median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 47 days (range: 6-573 days), with no statistically significant difference between patients older and younger than 60 years (p = 0.22). The median follow-up time was 1144 days (range: 27-3501 days). Cognitive deterioration was the most common presenting symptom, occurring in 19 out of 44 patients (43%). Brain MRI revealed that lobar lesions were the most frequent location of lesions, found in 24 out of 44 patients (55%). By the end of the study period, 30 patients (68%) had died, with a median survival of 666 days (range: 17-3291 days). Death was significantly more common in patients who experienced relapses (p = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.99-0.03), with these patients having a four times higher chance of death (HR = 4.1; 95% CI: 1.01-16.09). The time to diagnosis significantly correlated with survival (p = 0.02; 95% CI: 0.005-0.54), as did the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status at the last follow-up (p = 0.006; 95% CI: 0.0012-0.62). Patients aged over 60 years did not exhibit a higher likelihood of death (p = 0.19; HR = 2.3; 95% CI: 0.63-8.61); however, the threshold age at diagnosis for the maximally predicted mortality was 64 years (ROC = 0.73; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Patients had significant delays in diagnosis, affecting patient outcomes. Cognitive deterioration and lobar lesions were prominent clinical and radiological features. Mortality was notably higher in patients with relapses and those who had a longer time to diagnosis.

2.
Front Neurol ; 13: 973165, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36203984

ABSTRACT

Background and purpose: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is the most recommended tool for objectively quantifying the impairment caused by a suspected stroke. Nevertheless, it is mainly used by trained neurologists in the emergency department (ED). To bring forward the NIHSS to the pre-hospital setting, a smartphone-based Telestroke system was developed. It captures the full NIHSS by video, transmits it off-line, and enables assessment by a distant stroke physician. We aimed to compare the reliability of an NIHSS score determined by a neurologist from afar, using the platform with a standard NIHSS assessment performed in the emergency departments. Methods: A multi-center prospective study was conducted in two centers (Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, and Rambam, Israel). Patients admitted to the ED with suspected stroke had a neurological exam based on the NIHSS, while being recorded by the system. A skilled neurologist rated the NIHSS according to the videos offline. The results were compared with the NIHSS score given by a neurologist at the bedside. Results: A total of 95 patients with suspected stroke were included. The overall intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.936 (0.99 in VdH and 0.84 in Rambam), indicating excellent and good reliability, respectively. Conclusion: Remote stroke assessment based on the NIHSS, using videos segments collected by a dedicated platform, installed on a standard smartphone, is a reliable measurement as compared with the bedside evaluation.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL