A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Between Lumenis Pulse 120H and VersaPulse Select 80W.

Objectives: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a valid and safe procedure for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. This study aimed to examine the perioperative outcomes of HoLEP using a new laser platform, Lumenis Pulse™ 120H, and a previous laser platform, VersaPulse Select 80W. Methods: A total of 612 patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation were enrolled, including 188 and 424 patients who underwent enucleation using Lumenis Pulse 120H and VersaPulse Select 80W, respectively. They were matched using propensity scores with preoperative patient characteristics, and the differences between the two groups, including operative time, enucleated specimen, transfusion rate, and complication rate, were examined. Results: Propensity score-matched cohort comprised 364 patients with 182 in the Lumenis Pulse 120H group (50.0%) and 182 in the VersaPulse Select 80W group (50.0%). Operative time was significantly shorter with Lumenis Pulse 120H (55.2 ± 34.4 vs 101.4 ± 54.3 minutes, p < 0.001). In contrast, no significant differences were seen in resected specimen weight (43.8 ± 29.8 vs 39.6 ± 22.6 g, p = 0.36), rate of incidental prostate cancer (7.7% vs 10.4%, p = 0.36), transfusion rate (0.6% vs 1.1%, p = 0.56), and perioperative complication rates, including urinary tract infection, hematuria, urinary retention, and capsular perforation (5.0% vs 5.0%, 4.4% vs 2.7%, 0.5% vs 4.4%, 0.5% vs 0%, respectively, p = 0.13). Conclusions: Lumenis Pulse 120H improved the operative time significantly, which is regarded as one of the disadvantages of HoLEP.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with previous holmium laser enucleation of the prostate is challenging, and few studies have analyzed its perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes. Here we retrospectively evaluated 298 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies, including 25 with and 273 without previous holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, performed in 2015-2022. Regarding perioperative outcomes, operative and console times were significantly longer in the previous holmium laser enucleation of the prostate group. In contrast, the estimated blood loss was similar between groups, and there were no transfusions or intraoperative complications. Multivariable Cox hazard regression analysis of the functional outcomes of postoperative urinary continence showed that body mass index, intraoperative bladder neck repair, and nerve sparing were independently associated factors, whereas a history of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate was not. Similarly, a history of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate was not associated with biochemical recurrence; however, positive surgical margins and seminal vesicle invasion were independent risk factors of biochemical recurrence. Our findings revealed that robot-assisted radical prostatectomy after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate was safe and raised no concerns of postoperative urinary incontinence or biochemical recurrence. Therefore, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy may be a treatment option for patients with prostate cancer after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

Detection rate and variables associated with incidental prostate cancer by holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

OBJECTIVES: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate is well-established and effective for bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The objective of this study was to examine the detection rate of incidental prostate cancer by holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and variables associated with them. METHODS: A total of 612 patients were enrolled. We retrospectively examined the detection rate of incidental prostate cancer and perioperative variables associated with them. RESULTS: Forty-nine of 612 patients were diagnosed with incidental prostate cancer. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher prostate-specific antigen density (odds ratio 3.34, 95% confidence interval 1.02-10.94, P = 0.05), higher prostate-specific antigen density of the transition zone (odds ratio 2.28, 95% confidence interval 1.02-5.09, P = 0.04), and findings of the prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging (peripheral zone: odds ratio 4.71, 95% confidence interval 1.70-13.1, P = 0.003; transition zone: odds ratio 3.46, 95% confidence interval 1.74-6.86, P < 0.001; peripheral and transition zones: odds ratio 6.00, 95% confidence interval 1.51-23.8, P = 0.01) were significantly associated with incidental prostate cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that findings of the prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging (peripheral zone: odds ratio 4.36, 95% confidence interval 1.49-12.8, P = 0.001; transition zone: odds ratio 3.54, 95% confidence interval 1.75-7.16, P < 0.001; peripheral and transition zones: odds ratio 6.14, 95% confidence interval 1.53-24.5, P = 0.01) was an independent risk factor for incidental prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: The detection rate of incidental prostate cancer was 8.0%, and findings of the prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging were an independent predictive factor for incidental prostate cancer.