Intraocular pressure-lowering effects of ripasudil on open-angle glaucoma in eyes with high myopia and pathological myopia.

The aim is to study the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effects of additional administration of ripasudil in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients including high myopia (HM) and pathological myopia (PM). Study design is retrospective cohort study. We assessed the changes in the mean IOP between the HM eyes (axial length ≧ 26.5 mm 33 eyes) and the non-HM eyes (axial length < 26.5 mm 29 eyes) at 4 and 12 weeks from baseline. We also assessed the IOP changes between the PM eyes (21 eyes) and the non-PM eyes (41 eyes). The significant IOP reduction by the ripasudil administration was observed at 4 weeks in the non-HM eyes and at 12 weeks in HM and non-HM eyes. And the IOP reduction in the HM eyes was significantly less than the non-HM eyes at 4 and 12 weeks. IOP reduction by ripasudil had statistically significant association with the baseline IOP and presence of PM. Furthermore, significant IOP reduction by the ripasudil administration was observed at 4 and 12 weeks in the non-PM eyes, but not in the PM eyes. The additional administration of ripasudil was effective in the HM eyes, but less than non-HM eyes. And the PM may negatively contribute to reducing the IOP by ripasudil.

Outcomes of standalone ab interno trabeculotomy in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma in eyes with high myopia.

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of trabeculotomy glaucoma surgery in treating open-angle glaucoma (OAG) in eyes with high myopia (HM). METHODS: This study included 20 eyes with HM (axial length ≥ 26.5 mm) and OAG; age, preoperative IOP (intraocular pressure), and sex-matched 20 non-HM eyes (axial length < 26.5 mm) served as controls. Each eye underwent standalone ab interno trabeculotomy using a Kahook dual blade. A follow-up examination was performed 36 months after surgery. The main outcome measure was the operative success rate (i.e., a ≥ 20% pre- to post-operative reduction in IOP with or without IOP-lowering medication). Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed as a measure of surgical success. The secondary outcome measures were postoperative IOP, the number of glaucoma medications, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: IOP and the number of glaucoma medications were statistically significantly reduced at all postoperative follow-up examinations. The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the probability of postoperative success at 36 months was 45% and 65% for HM and non-HM eyes, respectively. In the HM group, the presence of pathological myopia was statistically significant risk factor for surgical failure. No critical postoperative complications were detected. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the long-term efficacy of ab interno trabeculotomy in HM eyes with OAG was inferior to that in non-HM eyes with OAG. Our findings suggest that surgical indications for trabeculotomy in HM should be determined based on the presence of pathological myopia.