ABSTRACT
AIM: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is one of the common complications of liver cirrhosis. Although anticoagulation contributes to thrombus resolution and is considered the first-choice treatment, its impact on patients' prognosis is still controversial. This study aimed to clarify the benefit of anticoagulation on mortality, liver function, and the incidence of liver cirrhosis-related complications in cirrhotic PVT patients. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective review in which we included 78 eligible patients with PVT out of 439. After propensity score matching, 21 cirrhotic PVT patients were included in each one of the untreated control and anticoagulation groups. RESULTS: Overall survival was significantly improved in the anticoagulation group compared with the control group (p = 0.041), along with PVT size reduction (53.3% vs. 108.2%, p = 0.009). At the time of CT follow-up, the anticoagulation group showed a lower ALBI score (p = 0.037) and its prevalence of massive ascites was significantly lower (p = 0.043) compared with the control group. The incidence of overt encephalopathy was also lower in the anticoagulation group (p = 0.041). The cumulative incidence of bleeding events did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation improves the survival of patients with cirrhotic PVT. Preserved liver function and reduced risks of cirrhosis-related complications under the treatment may have contributed to a better prognosis. Given its efficacy and safety, anticoagulation is worth initiating in patients with PVT.
ABSTRACT
A 52-year-old female had cholecystoduodenostomy for biliary atresia of type I cyst at 120 days of age. The patient's surgery recovery was uneventful;however, the patient had recurring cholangitis at the age of 27. The patient had high hepatobiliary enzymes in the outpatient clinic and was diagnosed with cholangitis. In general, the Kasai method is the mainstream for biliary atresia, since it has a much-reduced incidence of both early and late postoperative problems. However, this patient had biliary atresia of type I cyst and had undergone cholecystoduodenostomy. We suspected that the obstructive cholangitis was caused by the relatively wide anastomosis opening into the duodenal bulb, where the stomach contents pass through the most, and the poor clearance owing to the convoluted cystic duct;therefore, we chose to place a stent endoscopically. However, to our surprise, Class V was detected in the bile cytology performed as a precaution. Although no tumor was seen on imaging such as contrast-enhanced CT, EUS, and PET/CT, mapping biopsy results showed the presence of cancer at the bifurcation of the cystic duct. The patient had cholangiocarcinoma confined to the extrahepatic bile ducts only;thus, extrahepatic bile duct resection was conducted. The patient was discovered to have biliary intraepithelial neoplasia-3, and the tumor was entirely respectable. The patient had a good postoperative course, with normalization of liver function and no recurrence of cholangitis. In this case, cholangiocarcinoma was detected at an early stage by cytological examination performed as a precaution during endoscopic therapy for recurrent cholangitis. In addition to the fact that the long-term pathogenesis of biliary atresia is still unknown, it is important to note the presence of malignancy, which has the greatest effect on the patient prognosis, considering that the course of the disease varies depending on the operation carried out. Because cholecystoduodenostomy for biliary atresia is a rare approach, and there has been no previous report of related cholangiocarcinoma, we report this case for the benefit of gastroenterologists who may encounter similar cases in the future.
