ABSTRACT
The Long Evans cinnamon (LEC) rat is highly susceptible to X-irradiation due to defective DNA repair and is thus a model for hepatocellular carcinogenesis. We constructed a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) contig of rat chromosome 4 completely covering the region associated with radiation susceptibility. We used transient and stable transfections to demonstrate that defective DNA repair in LEC cells is fully complemented by a 200-kb BAC, CHORI-230-65K18. Further analysis showed that the region associated with radiation susceptibility is located in a 128,543-bp region of 65K18 that includes the known gene Rpn1. However, neither knockdown nor overexpression of Rpn1 indicated that this gene is associated with radiation susceptibility. We also mapped three ESTs (TC523872, TC533727, and CB607546) in the 128,543-bp region, suggesting that 65K18 contains an unknown gene associated with X-ray susceptibility in the LEC rat.
Subject(s)
Chromosome Mapping , DNA Damage , DNA Repair , Animals , Base Sequence , Cell Line , Clone Cells , DNA Primers , Genetic Complementation Test , Radiation Tolerance/genetics , Rats , Transfection , X-RaysABSTRACT
LEC rats constitute an animal model of high susceptibility to X-rays. We developed congenic LEC rat lines (recipient strain, Fischer 344 (F344)) and performed genome-wide genotyping to identify radiation susceptibility genes. We mapped seven positional candidate genes, Bmp10, Gpr73, Gp9, Cnbp, Copg, Rab7, and Rpn1, to an approximately 1.2-Mb region located between loci D4Got85 and D4Got148 on chromosome 4. None of the seven genes has been reported to be associated with radiation susceptibility. Comparison of the coding sequences for these seven genes in F344 and LEC rats showed no changes in deduced amino acid sequences. We determined gene expression differences in Gp73, Gp9, and Cnbp as well as strain-specific variations in upstream sequences of these genes. Our results suggest that radiation susceptibility in the LEC rat is primarily attributable to one of the genes within this approximately 1.2-Mb region; however, expression analysis gave no clear indication as to which gene is responsible.
