A combination therapy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and airway stent placement using a transparent silicone stent.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a combination therapy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and airway stent placement using a transparent silicone stent (gold studded stent [GSS]). Laser irradiation (664 nm, continuous wave) was performed through the GSS using a straight and cylindrical fiber 1.0 cm away from a power meter. There are two types of GSS: the TD type for the trachea and the BD type for the bronchus. Laser outputs were set to 150 mW, 180 mW, 210 mW, 240 mW, 270 mW, and 300 mW. The laser powers passing through the both types of GSS were measured three times for each outputs and the averages were calculated. Based on the results, animal experiment was performed using two female pigs. Under general anesthesia, a GSS (BD type) was inserted into trachea of pigs, and PDT using NPe6 as a photosensitizer was performed by 100 J/cm2 laser irradiation on parts of the trachea with and without a GSS. Immediately after and 1 week after PDT, pig tracheas were harvested and histological analysis was performed. Histological analysis of areas with or without the stent showed edematous changes between the cartilage and submucosal layer immediately after PDT, and necrotic changes 1 week later. The effectiveness of NPe6-PDT for pigs' trachea covered by the stent was same as trachea without the stent. The use of a GSS may enable PDT to be effective even in the area covered by the stent.

Factors Influencing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Identifying the Histologic Type of Non--Small-Lung Cancer With Small Samples.

BACKGROUND: The pathologic diagnosis has become a greater consideration in decision-making regarding the treatment options for lung cancer. Therefore, the accurate diagnosis of the tumor histologic type is essential, even when only small biopsy or cytology samples are available. However, the risk of a misdiagnosis with smaller biopsy samples is greater. The factors underlying the increased risk of a misdiagnosis in small samples are unknown. The aim of the present study was to identify the clinical and pathologic factors (other than immunohistochemical staining) that influence the pathologic diagnostic accuracy in small biopsy and cytological lung samples obtained by bronchoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed transbronchial lung biopsy or brushing and lavage to determine the preoperative diagnosis of 126 of 299 surgically resected lung cancer specimens. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the preoperative transbronchoscopic examination findings against that of the surgically resected lung specimens. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, the mean pathologic tumor size in the noncorresponding cases was larger than that in corresponding cases. Vascular invasion was also more prevalent in the noncorresponding cases. The tumor differentiation grade in the noncorresponding cases was poorer than in the corresponding cases. The noncorresponding cases were at a more progressed stage. On multivariate analysis, the pathologic tumor size and tumor differentiation grade were associated with the noncorresponding cases. CONCLUSION: We found a larger tumor size and poor differentiation grade were indicative of lung cancer tissue with a greater content of heterogeneous cells. Therefore, a possibility exists of a false diagnosis using only these factors. Thus, treatment decisions should be made considering the pathologic diagnosis and other relevant factors.

Clinical usefulness of gefitinib for non-small-cell lung cancer with a double epidermal growth factor receptor mutation.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the pattern of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations affects sensitivity to gefitinib treatment. We investigated 44 surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) specimens obtained between 2001 and 2012 at the Tokyo Medical University Hospital. The specimens were obtained from patients treated with gefitinib as 1st-, 2nd-, or 3rd-line therapy for postoperative recurrent NSCLC. We detected EGFR mutations using the cycleave PCR technique. In addition, the specimens from non-responders were stained with antibodies against hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGFR; MET) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). We assessed the progression of non-responders over a period of 2 months. Intermediate responders were considered to be patients who responded (exhibiting at least stable disease) to gefitinib therapy for 3-11 months, while long-term responders were defined as those who responded to gefitinib therapy for >12 months. The NSCLCs were histologically classified as 43 adenocarcinomas and one large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. One patient had an exon 18 point mutation, 23 an exon 19 deletion, 2 an exon 20 point mutation, 16 an exon 21 point mutation and 2 patients had both exon 20 and 21 point mutations. There were 4 non-responders, including the 2 patients with exon 20 mutation, 25 intermediate responders (including 10 patients under ongoing treatment) and 15 long-term responders (2 of whom are under ongoing treatment), including the 2 patients with both exon 20 and 21 mutations. Of the specimens obtained from non-responders, 3 stained with the anti- MET antibody and 1 stained with the anti-HGF antibody. Therefore, NSCLC with exon 20 mutation may respond to gefitinib treatment in the presence of an additional EGFR mutation.

Quantitative p16 and ESR1 methylation in the peripheral blood of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Inactivation of the p16 and ESR1 tumor suppressor genes by promoter lesion methylation has been reported in many tumor types, including lung cancer. We examined the blood of 95 non-small cell lung cancer patients (66 cases of adenocarcinoma, 23 of squamous cell carcinoma and 6 of large cell carcinoma) and 30 controls consisting of normal subjects and benign disease patients to determine the methylation ratios of p16 and ESR1 using real-time PCR. For both genes, there was a statistically significant difference in the methylation ratio between non-small cell lung cancer patients and controls (p16; p<0.01, ESR1; p<0.001). In addition, there was a strong correlation between the methylation ratio of each gene and old age (p16; p<0.01, ESR1; p<0.001 and p16 or ESR1; p<0.001), and between p16 or ESR1 methylation rate and smoking history (p<0.01). Moreover in Stage I cases, the methylation positive rate of each gene (p16, ESR1 and p16 or ESR1) was higher than the CEA positive rate (p<0.05, p<0.001, p<0.001). Evaluation of p16 and ESR1 promoter methylation in blood using real-time PCR appears to be very useful for lung cancer diagnosis and there is some possibility that these methylated genes might come to represent useful biomarkers for the early detection of lung cancer. Our study results also suggested that comparative evaluation of the methylation ratio before and after surgery might be a powerful tool to predict the prognosis of lung cancer patients.