ST elevation myocardial infarction - national trend analysis with mortality differences in outcomes based on day of hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Patientswho present with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) need emergent revascularization. Our study aims to investigate the outcomes in patients with STEMI admitted during weekends versus weekdays. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample database. Patients with an admitting diagnosis of STEMI identified by the International Classification of Disease code for the year 2016 were analyzed. A weighted descriptive analysis was performed to generate national estimates. Patients admitted over the weekend were compared to those admitted over the weekday. Patients were stratified by demographic and clinical factors including the Elixhauser comorbidity index. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) utilization rate, rate of transfer-out, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charges. Statistical analysis including linear and logistic regression was performed using STATA. RESULTS: A total of 163 715 adult patients were admitted with STEMI, of which 27.9% (45 635) were admitted over the weekend. There were 76.2% Caucasians, 9.3% African Americans, and 8.0% Hispanics. Mean age of the patients was 63.2 years (95% CI, 62.9-63.5) for the weekend group and 63.7 years (95% CI, 63.5-63.9) for weekday admissions. The majority of the patients in both groups had Medicare (43.7% and 45.8% on weekends and weekdays, respectively; P = 0.0047). After adjusting for age, sex, race, income, Elixhauser comorbidity index, PCI use, hospital location, teaching status, and bed size, mortality was not significantly different in weekend versus weekday admissions (odds ratios 1.04; P = 0.498; 95% CI, 0.93-1.16). There was no significant difference in mean total charge per admission during the weekend versus weekday admissions ($107 093 versus $106 869; P = 0.99.) Mean LOS was 4.1 days for both groups (P = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in mortality, LOS, or total hospital charge in STEMI patients being admitted during the weekend versus weekdays.

Thirty-day readmission in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the nationwide readmission database.

BACKGROUND: There are rising numbers of patients who have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Poorly understood pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction and due to a sparsity of studies, the management of HFpEF is challenging. AIM: To determine the hospital readmission rate within 30 d of acute or acute on chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and its effect on mortality and burden on health care in the United States. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using the Agency for Health-care Research and Quality Health-care Cost and Utilization Project, Nationwide Readmissions Database for the year 2017. We collected data on hospital readmissions of 60514 adults hospitalized for acute or acute on chronic HFpEF. The primary outcome was the rate of all-cause readmission within 30 d of discharge. Secondary outcomes were cause of readmission, mortality rate in readmitted and index patients, length of stay, total hospitalization costs and charges. Independent risk factors for readmission were identified using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The thirty day readmission rate was 21%. Approximately 9.17% of readmissions were in the setting of acute on chronic diastolic heart failure. Hypertensive chronic kidney disease with heart failure (1245; 9.7%) was the most common readmission diagnosis. Readmitted patients had higher in-hospital mortality (7.9% vs 2.9%, P = 0.000). Our study showed that Medicaid insurance, higher Charlson co-morbidity score, patient admitted to a teaching hospital and longer hospital stay were significant variables associated with higher readmission rates. Lower readmission rate was found in residents of small metropolitan or micropolitan areas, older age, female gender, and private insurance or no insurance were associated with lower risk of readmission. CONCLUSION: We found that patients hospitalized for acute or acute on chronic HFpEF, the thirty day readmission rate was 21%. Readmission cases had a higher mortality rate and increased healthcare resource utilization. The most common cause of readmission was cardio-renal syndrome.

Slither Into the Heart: Salmonella Endocarditis Following Rattlesnake Meat Ingestion.

Salmonellae foodborne infections are a well described and documented entity, however cardiac complications of Salmonellae foodborne infections including infective endocarditis (IE) are rare. Here we present a case of infective endocarditis as a result of bacteremia caused by multiple species of Salmonella. The patient initially presented with chest pain, fever and altered mental status. Troponin and ECG were unremarkable. The patient was started on empiric antibiotics. Blood cultures grew Salmonella species serotype O&H. Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) confirmed aortic valve vegetation. Regional cultural practices suggested possible contamination attributed to ingestion of rattlesnake meat, a practice that has been previously described and well-established in various Hispanic folk practices. Upon further history taking, the patient was found to be regularly consuming dried rattlesnake meat preparations, a rather common practice in Chihuahua desert region. Surgery was not indicated, and the patient was treated with six weeks of antibiotics. This case presents an opportunity to gain insight into such a unique manifestation of Salmonellae, offering a potential facet of information for clinicians to better understand its presentation, susceptibility, and potential adverse outcomes.

Medical Therapy Versus Revascularization in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease and Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews the evidence on optimal medical therapy (OMT) versus coronary revascularization in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). RECENT FINDINGS: A post hoc analysis of the COURAGE trial in patients with SIHD and CKD showed no difference in freedom from angina, death, and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) between OMT and percutaneous intervention plus OMT compared with patients without CKD. The ISCHEMIA-CKD trial of 777 patients with advanced CKD revealed no difference in cumulative incidence of death or nonfatal MI at 3 years between OMT and revascularization but the composite of death or new dialysis was higher in the invasive arm. Additionally, there were no significant or sustained benefits in related to angina-related health status in invasive versus conservative strategy. An initial revascularization strategy does not reduce mortality or MI or relieve angina symptoms in patients with SIHD and advanced CKD.

Current Use and Trends in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Intervention.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the clinical evidence on the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) revascularization options in left main (LM) disease in comparison with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Coronary artery disease (CAD) involving the LM is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Though CABG remains the gold standard for complex CAD involving the LM artery, recent trials have shown a trend towards non-inferiority of the LM PCI when compared with CABG in certain subset of patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Two recent major randomized trials compared the outcomes of PCI versus CABG in the LM and multi-vessel disease with LM involvement. The NOBLE trial included patients with all range of Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) scores and utilized biolimus drug-eluting stent (DES). The trial concluded that MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event) was significantly higher with PCI (28%) when compared with CABG (18%) but overall stroke and motility were not different. EXCEL trial evaluated the same treatment option in low to intermediate SYNTAX score population with third-generation everolimus DES platform as PCI option. Results showed no significant differences in the composite primary endpoints of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) at the end of 30 days (22% versus 19.2%, p = 0.13), although repeat revascularization was higher in PCI group (16.9% versus 10%). Recent evidence suggests that PCI is an acceptable alternative to treat symptomatic LM stenosis in select group of patients. In low to medium SYNTAX score, particularly in patients without diabetes mellitus, PCI remains a viable option. Future trials focusing on evaluating subset of patients who would benefit from one particular revascularization option in comparison with other is warranted.

The Clinical Significance of Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) have emerged as the invasive diagnostic tools of choice for hemodynamic assessment of the severity of CAD (coronary artery disease). We sought to comprehensively review the evidence on the utility of hemodynamic assessment of the coronary stenoses after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using FFR/iFR, mechanisms of positive post-PCI iFR/FFR, and the clinical impact of significant residual ischemia. RECENT FINDINGS: The evidence on the utility of the post-PCI hemodynamic assessment has accumulated over the last few years. The post hoc analysis from the FAME 1 and FAME 2 data shows that higher post-PCI FFR is associated with better symptomatic improvement and lower event rate with larger increase in delta FFR (∆ FFR: post-PCI FFR - pre-PCI FFR). Unlike pre-PCI FFR, a consensus has not been established on the optimal value of post-PCI FFR, though multiple studies point toward better clinical outcomes with higher post-PCI FFR and larger ∆ FFR. Visual assessment of adequate stent apposition by coronary angiography is insufficient in evaluating for residual ischemia. The hemodynamic evaluation of residual ischemia by post-PCI FFR/iFR yields clinically relevant data and allows for appropriate post PCI optimization.

Patent Foramen Ovale, the Role of Antiplatelet Therapy Alone or Anticoagulant Therapy Alone Versus Device Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke: A Review of the Literature and Current Recommendations.

Cryptogenic stroke and its relation to the Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) is a long-debated topic. Recent clinical trials have unequivocally established the relationship between cryptogenic strokes and paradoxical embolism across the PFO. This slit-like communication exists in everyone before birth, but most often closes shortly after birth. PFO may persist as a narrow channel of communication between the right and left atria in approximately 25-27% of adults. In this review, we examine the clinical relevance of the PFO with analysis of the latest trials evaluating catheter-based closure of PFO's for cryptogenic stroke. We also review the current evidence examining the use of antiplatelet medications versus anticoagulants for stroke prevention in those patients with PFO who do not qualify for closure per current guidelines.