ABSTRACT
Background: Peritonitis is inflammation of the peritoneum usually as a result of a localized or generalized infection. Secondary peritonitis which is the most common type follows an infective process in a visceral organ. The role of peritoneal cultures and use of antibiotics effective against culture results remain controversial. Objectives: This study was conducted to determine the bacterial and antibiotic sensitivity pattern in patients with secondary peritonitis. It also compared the use of empirical antibiotics and culture-sensitive antibiotics with outcomes of patients with secondary peritonitis. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized clinical study was conducted. Five millilitres of peritoneal fluid was sampled intra-operatively, and microscopy, culture, and sensitivity testing was performed in patients with secondary peritonitis. The patients, randomized into two groups, had antibiotics administered for 7 days. The first group had empirical antibiotics throughout (Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole), whereas the second group had empirical antibiotics (Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole) for the first 2 days and antibiotics according to the sensitivity report for the remaining 5 days. The post-hoc analysis was also done on a third group, who, even though were randomized to either groups, had no growth on culture of peritoneal fluid. Results: The commonest pathogens identified from the peritoneal culture of the participants were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Anaerococcus group, and Bacteroides fragilis. Complications including mortality were significantly higher in those who received empirical antibiotics than those who received culture-sensitive antibiotics. Conclusion: The outcome of antibiotics administration in patients with secondary peritonitis with a positive culture was better in those who received culture-sensitive antibiotics than those who received empirical antibiotics.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Chronic leg ulcers are defects in the skin below the level of knee persisting for more than six weeks and shows no tendency to heal after three or more months. Zinc is a necessary component of several DNA & RNA polymerases and transferases essential for cell proliferation. Zinc deficiency is known to retard wound healing by preventing cellular mitosis and disturbance of fibroblast function and collagen synthesis. This study compares zinc levels in patients with chronic leg ulcers with apparently healthy individuals. METHODS: Five milliliters of venous blood samples was taken from twelve patients with chronic leg ulcers. Five milliliters of venous blood samples was also taken from a control group, who do not have chronic leg ulcers, but are matched with the cases in age (± 5 yr), sex, socioeconomic status and body mass index (± 3 kg/m2). Plasma zinc levels was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Principal exposure include the socio-demographic characteristics of patients, duration of symptoms before presentation, signs of ulcer-site, number, size, depth, base, edge, presence of discharge, enlarged lymph nodes and local neurovascular integrity. The outcome variables include plasma levels of biochemical markers measured -Zinc, serum albumin, total protein. RESULTS: The plasma zinc levels was significantly lower (P<0.01) in patients with chronic leg ulcer (92.808±16.689 µg/dl) as compared with control subjects (109.413 ± 9.304 µg/dl). There was no statistical difference in albumin and protein levels in both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic leg ulcers have significantly lower plasma zinc levels than apparently healthy individuals.
