ABSTRACT
(Purpose) This study examined the usefulness of positron emission tomography (PET) / computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of metastasis in patients with urothelial carcinoma. (Materials and methods) The subjects were patients who were newly diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma in our department on whom we performed CT and PET/CT to search for metastasis. (Results) The median age of the 92 subjects was 71 years, and bladder and upper tract urotherial cancer were underlying diseases in 41 (46%) and 51 (54%) patients, respectively. In 66 (72%) of the 92 cases, no metastasis was observed by CT, while PET/CT revealed metastasis in 9 (14%). The 57 (86%) patients in whom both CT and PET/CT showed no metastasis underwent radical surgery, while 2 patients (4%) exhibited pathological lymph node metastasis.Of the 26 patients in whom CT revealed metastasis, PET/CT showed no metastasis in 3 (12%), and the absence of pathological metastasis was confirmed in all patients. Of the 23 patients found to have metastasis in both CT and PET/CT, metastasis that could not be identified by CT was discovered by performing PET/CT in 10 (43%) patients.PET/CT showed significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than CT alone (p< 0.01), with sensitivities of 94.1% and 67.6%, specificities of 100% and 94.8%, and positive diagnosis rates of 97.8% and 84.7%, respectively. (Conclusions) PET/CT in patients with urothelial cancer revealed that metastases that cannot be diagnosed by CT alone are found at a significant frequency. Since these metastases can affect treatment choices in patients with urothelial cancer, PET/CT is considered to be useful in diagnosing patients with urothelial cancer.
