Hematocrit stability following intravenous versus subcutaneous administration of epoetin alfa to dialysis patients: a post hoc analysis.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND, SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A previous study of epoetin alfa dose requirements [Paganini et al. 1995] among hemodialysis patients who were switched from thrice weekly intravenous (i.v.) to thrice weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) administration showed that the weekly epoetin alfa dose requirement decreased by 18.5% after 13 to 16 weeks s.c. treatment and 26.5% after 21 to 24 weeks, without significant change in hematocrit. There was patient-to-patient variation in response, however, and 39% of the patients required the same or greater doses of epoetin alfa after the change from i.v. to s.c. administration. The present study reexamines the database to compare hematocrit stability between the two routes of administration. RESULTS: During 4 weeks of i.v. epoetin alfa administration, the pooled standard deviation (SD) for the patients' (n = 72) weekly hematocrit measurements was 1.40, compared with weeks 13 to 16 of s.c. epoetin alfa administration when the SD was 1.66 (p < 0.01). Among 41 patients who completed 24 weeks of s.c. therapy, the pooled SD for the 4 weeks of i.v. treatment was 1.37 compared with 2.02 during weeks 21-24 of s.c. treatment (p < 0.01). Sixty-eight percent of patients had lower hematocrit SD during 4 weeks of i.v. therapy than during the 4 weeks of s.c. therapy (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that hematocrits may be more stable when epoetin alfa is administered i.v. rather than s.c. to patients on dialysis. These results would be expected since 100% of i.v.-administered epoetin alfa reaches the systemic circulation compared with 18% to 80% bioavailability of s.c.-administered epoetin alfa. Within-patient variation in s.c. epoetin alfa absorption may be related to non-uniformity of adipose tissue, blood supply, lymphatic drainage, and other factors at sequential injection sites, and may explain the variability in hematocrit after s.c. administration.

The effects of normal as compared with low hematocrit values in patients with cardiac disease who are receiving hemodialysis and epoetin.

BACKGROUND: In patients with end-stage renal disease, anemia develops as a result of erythropoietin deficiency, and recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) is prescribed to correct the anemia partially. We examined the risks and benefits of normalizing the hematocrit in patients with cardiac disease who were undergoing hemodialysis. METHODS: We studied 1233 patients with clinical evidence of congestive heart failure or ischemic heart disease who were undergoing hemodialysis: 618 patients were assigned to receive increasing doses of epoetin to achieve and maintain a hematocrit of 42 percent, and 615 were assigned to receive doses of epoetin sufficient to maintain a hematocrit of 30 percent throughout the study. The median duration of treatment was 14 months. The primary end point was the length of time to death or a first nonfatal myocardial infarction. RESULTS: After 29 months, there were 183 deaths and 19 first nonfatal myocardial infarctions among the patients in the normal-hematocrit group and 150 deaths and 14 nonfatal myocardial infarctions among those in the low-hematocrit group (risk ratio for the normal-hematocrit group as compared with the low-hematocrit group, 1.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.9 to 1.9). Although the difference in event-free survival between the two groups did not reach the prespecified statistical stopping boundary, the study was halted. The causes of death in the two groups were similar. The mortality rates decreased with increasing hematocrit values in both groups. The patients in the normal-hematocrit group had a decline in the adequacy of dialysis and received intravenous iron dextran more often than those in the low-hematocrit group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with clinically evident congestive heart failure or ischemic heart disease who are receiving hemodialysis, administration of epoetin to raise their hematocrit to 42 percent is not recommended.

Intravenous versus subcutaneous dosing of epoetin alfa in hemodialysis patients.

Hemodialysis patients were studied to determine whether the dose of recombinant human erythropoietin (Epoetin alfa; Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA) required to maintain a therapeutic hematocrit level changed when the route of administration was switched from intravenously (IV) three times per week to subcutaneously (SC) three times per week. Thirteen to 16 weeks after patients were changed from IV three times per week to SC three times per week treatment, the Epoetin alfa requirement was reduced by 18.5% +/- 3.8% (P < 0.001; n = 72), and after 21 to 24 weeks of SC treatment the mean dosage had decreased from the IV dose by 26.5% +/- 4.2% (P < 0.001; n = 41). Sixty-one percent (44 of 72) of patients experienced maintenance-dose reductions over 13 to 16 weeks of treatment and 80% (33 of 41) were maintained on lower weekly doses after 21 to 24 weeks of treatment than at baseline (IV). There was interpatient variability, however: 26% of the patients required greater doses SC than IV following 13 to 16 weeks of SC treatment, and 15% required greater doses SC than IV following 21 to 24 weeks. On completing the initial SC three-times-per-week stage of the study, patients were randomized to one of three SC dosing strategies for an additional 12 weeks: (1) once per week, (2) three times per week Epoetin alfa diluted 1:2 with bacteriostatic saline to mitigate stinging at the injection site, or (3) continued three times per week with undiluted Epoetin alfa. Patients who were switched to administration of SC once per week undiluted Epoetin alfa (n = 20) had their total weekly dose lowered by 18.0% +/- 9.4% (P > 0.05), but the mean hematocrit for this cohort also decreased, from 34.3% +/- 3.0% to 32.4% +/- 3.9% (P > 0.05), rendering dose comparison between the two schedules ambiguous. The maintenance dose for patients who received Epoetin alfa diluted 1:2 with bacteriostatic saline (n = 23) did not differ from the undiluted three times per week dose at the end of stage 1. The third cohort of patients (n = 24), who continued to receive undiluted Epoetin alfa on the same SC three-times-per-week schedule, did not require a significant change in dosage over the ensuing 12 weeks. Comparison of SC three times per week mean dosage after an average of 32 weeks following the switch from IV three times per week for this latter cohort revealed a decrease of 23.5% +/- 6.5% (P < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)