Correction: Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility?

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235191.].

Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility?

Leading academic institutions, governments, and funders of research across the world have spent the last few decades fretting publicly about the need for scientists and research organisations to engage more widely with the public and be open about their research. While a global literature asserts that public communication has changed from a virtue to a duty for scientists in many countries and disciplines, our knowledge about what research institutions are doing and what factors drive their 'going public' is very limited. Here we present the first cross-national study of N = 2,030 research institutes within universities and large scientific organisations in Brazil, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. We find that institutes embrace communication with non-peers and do so through a variety of public events and traditional news media-less so through new media channels-and we find variation across countries and sciences, yet these are less evident than we expected. Country and disciplinary cultures contribute to the level of this communication, as do the resources that institutes make available for the effort; institutes with professionalised staff show higher activity online. Future research should examine whether a real change in the organisational culture is happening or whether this activity and resource allocation is merely a means to increase institutional visibility.

Differences in serum bisphenol a concentrations in premenopausal normal women and women with endometrial hyperplasia.

Exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) has been raised in relation to its potential for adverse health outcomes. Bisphenol A (BPA) is an estrogenic EDC widely found in plastic products. We determined BPA concentrations in premenopausal women by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and evaluated possible linkage between its contamination levels and endometrial hyperplasia, an estrogen-related disorder of the uterus. It has been implied that higher levels of BPA, which binds to estrogen receptor and plays estrogenic roles may, enhance endometrial hyperplasia. Serum BPA was detectable in all subjects and its concentrations in healthy controls with normal endometrium were 2.5 +/- 1.5 ng/ml (mean +/- SD). BPA levels in patients with simple endometrial hyperplasia with benign nature were 2.9 +/- 2.0 ng/ml and were not significantly different from the controls. Unexpectedly, BPA levels in patients with complex endometrial hyperplasia with malignant potential were 1.4 +/- 0.4 ng/ml and significantly lower compared to both control and simple endometrial hyperplasia groups. In addition, we measured the serum BPA levels in postmenopausal endometrial cancer patient (1.4 +/- 0.5 ng/ml), which were also significantly lower than control and simple endometrial hyperplasia groups. These findings suggest the presence of associations between BPA exposure and complex endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer. The mode of action of BPA may be more complex than expected and the contradictory results may serve as a clue to addressing the mechanisms of linkage between occurrence of estrogen-dependent diseases and endocrine disruption.