The impact of CREBRF rs373863828 Pacific-variant on infant body composition.

In Maori and Pacific adults, the CREBRF rs373863828 minor (A) allele is associated with increased body mass index (BMI) but reduced incidence of type-2 and gestational diabetes mellitus. In this prospective cohort study of Maori and Pacific infants, nested within a nutritional intervention trial for pregnant women with obesity and without pregestational diabetes, we investigated whether the rs373863828 A allele is associated with differences in growth and body composition from birth to 12-18 months' corrected age. Infants with and without the variant allele were compared using generalised linear models adjusted for potential confounding by gestation length, sex, ethnicity and parity, and in a secondary analysis, additionally adjusted for gestational diabetes. Carriage of the rs373863828 A allele was not associated with altered growth and body composition from birth to 6 months. At 12-18 months, infants with the rs373863828 A allele had lower whole-body fat mass [FM 1.4 (0.7) vs. 1.7 (0.7) kg, aMD -0.4, 95% CI -0.7, 0.0, P = 0.05; FM index 2.2 (1.1) vs. 2.6 (1.0) kg/m2 aMD -0.6, 95% CI -1.2,0.0, P = 0.04]. However, this association was not significant after adjustment for gestational diabetes, suggesting that it may be mediated, at least in part, by the beneficial effect of CREBRF rs373863828 A allele on maternal glycemic status.

Diabetes in pregnancy: Women's views of care in a multi-ethnic, low socioeconomic population with midwifery continuity-of-care.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes in pregnancy is diagnosed in 6% of pregnancies annually in Aotearoa-New Zealand, disproportionately affecting multi-ethnic, low socio-economic women. Little is known about the care experience of this population within the model of midwifery continuity-of-care, including views of telehealth care. AIM: Increase understanding of the experience of diabetes in pregnancy care, including telehealth, among multi-ethnic, low socio-economic women receiving midwifery continuity-of-care. METHODS: Qualitative interview study with primarily indigenous and migrant women who had diabetes in pregnancy and gave birth 6-18 months previously. Interviewers were matched with participants by ethnicity. Transcripts were analysed using Framework analysis. RESULTS: Participants were 19 women (5 Maori, 5 Pacific Peoples, 5 Asian, 4 European). Data analysis revealed three key themes: 1) 'shock, shame, and adjustment' to the diagnosis 2) 'learning to manage diabetes in pregnancy' and 3) 'preparation for birth and beyond' to the postpartum period. DISCUSSION: Receiving the diagnosis of diabetes in pregnancy was a shock. Managing diabetes during pregnancy was particularly challenging for indigenous and migrant women, who wished for better access to culturally appropriate dietary and lifestyle information. Women appreciated having options of telehealth and face-to-face consultations. Preparation for birth and postpartum diabetes follow-up were areas requiring significant improvement. Challenges were mitigated through care from a consistent diabetes specialist midwife and community-based midwifery continuity-of-care. CONCLUSION: Midwives were the backbone of diabetes in pregnancy care for this multi-ethnic, low socio-economic population. Care could be improved with more culturally appropriate diet and lifestyle information, better birth preparation, and expanded postpartum diabetes support.

A validation of placental pathology reports by ethnicity in New Zealand, through systematic analysis of histological slides.

INTRODUCTION: Reliability studies of placental examination have shown differing interobserver agreement for certain pathological features, a lack of uniform reporting criteria and variable experience among pathologists. In previous analyses we have shown that placental pathology differs by ethnicity. This validation study was performed to investigate whether bias related to ethnicity is a feature of placental pathology reporting in New Zealand (NZ). METHODS: 199 of 1726 eligible perinatal death cases between 2008 and 2017 were selected at random for this audit-type study, including 51 cases from South Asian, Maori and NZ European ethnicity and 46 cases from Pacific mothers. Stored histology slides were blinded and re-examined by an experienced perinatal pathologist, and linked to the corresponding original pathology report. Interobserver agreement (overall, by ethnicity and by gestational age) was described by proportional differences and kappa coefficients. RESULTS: Total interobserver agreement between original placental reporting and the validation review was 89.7 %, which differed by pathological feature. There was generally more underreporting than overreporting (3.6 % and 6.7 %, respectively). There was little disagreement by ethnicity (decidual vasculopathy [p = 0.03]), although there were more differences by gestational age (villous morphology [p < 0.01], chorioamnionitis [p = 0.03], high-grade villitis of unknown etiology [p < 0.01], and placental haemorrhage [p = 0.03]). DISCUSSION: No systematic bias in placental pathology reporting in NZ was identified by ethnicity or gestational age, as observed differences could be related to the underlying prevalence of pathology. We identified more underreporting than overreporting of pathology in the original reports, emphasizing the importance of placental investigation by specialised perinatal pathologists.

An in-depth analysis of perinatal related mortality among women of South Asian ethnicity in Aotearoa New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: International and national New Zealand (NZ) research has identified women of South Asian ethnicity at increased risk of perinatal mortality, in particular stillbirth, with calls for increased perinatal research among this ethnic group. We aimed to analyse differences in pregnancy outcomes and associated risk factors between South Asian, Maori, Pacific and NZ European women in Aotearoa NZ, with a focus on women of South Asian ethnicity, to ultimately understand the distinctive pathways leading to adverse events. METHODS: Clinical data from perinatal deaths between 2008 and 2017 were provided by the NZ Perinatal and Maternal Mortality Review Committee, while national maternity and neonatal data, and singleton birth records from the same decade, were linked using the Statistics NZ Integrated Data Infrastructure for all births. Pregnancy outcomes and risk factors for stillbirth and neonatal death were compared between ethnicities with adjustment for pre-specified risk factors. RESULTS: Women of South Asian ethnicity were at increased risk of stillbirth (aOR 1.51, 95%CI 1.29-1.77), and neonatal death (aOR 1.51, 95%CI 1.17-1.92), compared with NZ European. The highest perinatal related mortality rates among South Asian women were between 20-23 weeks gestation (between 0.8 and 1.3/1,000 ongoing pregnancies; p < 0.01 compared with NZ European) and at term, although differences by ethnicity at term were not apparent until ≥ 41 weeks (p < 0.01). No major differences in commonly described risk factors for stillbirth and neonatal death were observed between ethnicities. Among perinatal deaths, South Asian women were overrepresented in a range of metabolic-related disorders, such as gestational diabetes, pre-existing thyroid disease, or maternal red blood cell disorders (all p < 0.05 compared with NZ European). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous reports, women of South Asian ethnicity in Aotearoa NZ were at increased risk of stillbirth and neonatal death compared with NZ European women, although only at extremely preterm (< 24 weeks) and post-term (≥ 41 weeks) gestations. While there were no major differences in established risk factors for stillbirth and neonatal death by ethnicity, metabolic-related factors were more common among South Asian women, which may contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes in this ethnic group.

Fish oil supplementation during pregnancy and postpartum in mothers with overweight and obesity to improve body composition and metabolic health during infancy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Maternal obesity during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of obesity and metabolic disease in the offspring. Supplementation with fish oil (FO), which is insulin sensitizing, during pregnancy in mothers with overweight or obesity may prevent the development of greater adiposity and metabolic dysfunction in their children. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of FO supplementation throughout the second half of pregnancy and lactation in mothers with overweight or obesity on infant body composition and metabolism. METHODS: A double-blind randomized controlled trial of 6 g FO (3.55 g/d of n-3 PUFAs) compared with olive oil (control) from mid-pregnancy until 3 mo postpartum. Eligible women had singleton pregnancies at 12-20 wk of gestation, and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. The primary outcome was the infant body fat percentage (DXA scans) at 2 wk of age. Secondary outcomes included maternal metabolic markers during pregnancy, infant anthropometry at 2 wk and 3 mo of age, and metabolic markers at 3 mo. RESULTS: A total of 129 mothers were randomized, and 98 infants had a DXA scan at 2 wk. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Imputed and nonimputed analyses showed no effects of FO supplementation on infant body fat percentage at age 2 wk. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: There were no treatment effects on infant outcomes at 2 wk, but FO infants had a higher BMI z-score (P = 0.025) and ponderal index (P = 0.017) at age 3 mo. FO supplementation lowered maternal triglycerides by 17% at 30 wk of pregnancy (P = 0.0002) and infant triglycerides by 21% at 3 mo of age (P = 0.016) but did not affect maternal or infant insulin resistance. The rate of emergency cesarean section was lower with FO supplementation [aRR = 0.38 (95%CI 0.16, 0.90); P = 0.027]. CONCLUSIONS: FO supplementation of mothers with overweight or obesity during pregnancy did not impact infant body composition. There is a need to follow up the offspring to determine whether the observed metabolic effects persist. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: This study was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617001078347p). In addition, the Universal Trial Number, WHO, was obtained (U1111-1199-5860).

Grouping women of South Asian ethnicity for pregnancy research in New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: The New Zealand (NZ) Ministry of Health ethnicity data protocols recommend that people of South Asian (SAsian) ethnicity, other than Indian, are combined with people of Japanese and Korean ethnicity at the most commonly used level of aggregation in health research (level two). This may not work well for perinatal studies, as it has long been observed that women of Indian ethnicity have higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as perinatal death. It is possible that women of other SAsian ethnicities share this risk. AIMS: This study was performed to identify appropriate groupings of women of SAsian ethnicity for perinatal research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: National maternity and neonatal data, and singleton birth records between 2008 and 2017 were linked using the Statistics NZ Integrated Data Infrastructure. Socio-demographic risk profiles and pregnancy outcomes were compared between 15 ethnic groups. Recommendations were made based on statistical analyses and cultural evaluation with members of the SAsian research community. RESULTS: Similarities were observed between women of Indian, Fijian Indian, South African Indian, Sri Lankan, Bangladeshi and Pakistani ethnicities. A lower-risk profile was seen among Japanese and Korean mothers. Risk profiles of women of combined Indian-Maori, Indian-Pacific and Indian-New Zealand European ethnicity more closely represented their corresponding non-Indian ethnicities. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings, we suggest a review of current NZ Ministry of Health ethnicity data protocols. We recommend that researchers understand the risk profiles of participants prior to aggregation of groups in research, to mitigate risks associated with masking differences.

Teleclinics for the management of diabetes in pregnancy during COVID-19-maternal satisfaction and pregnancy outcomes.

AIMS: Diabetes in pregnancy (DiP) rates are increasing worldwide. Pasifika, Indian and Maori peoples have high rates of DiP any improvements in clinical care may be beneficial for these populations. During COVID-19 lockdowns, the DiP service in Counties Manukau Health (CMH) South Auckland switched from face-to-face appointments to teleclinics. This study aims to: determine satisfaction of pregnant people with teleclinics for DiP; compare clinical outcomes and attendance for those receiving care through teleclinics versus standard care; and compare rates of clinic attendance between face-to-face and teleclinic appointments. METHODS: A standardised questionnaire was completed by those who had attended a teleclinic. The primary outcome was a high score (4-5/5) for satisfaction and future use. A separate, retrospective study of clinical outcomes, and the number of appointments scheduled/attended were compared between all DiP patients who were scheduled an appointment during lockdown, and all of those who were scheduled appointments the year prior. RESULTS: Of the thirty-five participants who completed the survey (response rate 37%), 89% scored the clinic highly for satisfaction and future use. There were 179 patients scheduled to clinic during the period where teleclinics were the default model of care, and 187 patients scheduled to clinic the year prior. No differences in clinical outcomes were observed. Those receiving care during lockdown were offered more appointments, although attendance rates did not differ. CONCLUSION: Teleclinics for DiP are acceptable to the people we surveyed, but should be developed further so they better support the needs of those using them.

The priorities for future clinical trials and large cohort studies addressing health and healthcare for mothers and babies in Aotearoa New Zealand.

AIMS: To identify priorities for clinical trials and large cohort studies addressing maternal and perinatal health and healthcare in Aotearoa New Zealand. METHODS: An Aotearoa New Zealand specific Research Prioritisation Framework was developed. Knowledge gaps were collected from an Audience Group via online questionnaires, video call interviews, and by systematic review. These were formulated into research questions. An Advisory Group reviewed questions suited to a clinical trial or large cohort study. A Ranking Group weighted the ranking criteria and ranked the research questions. RESULTS: A total of 305 online questionnaires, 62 interviews and 62 published prioritisation projects generated 3,347 knowledge gaps. After content analysis, 358 unanswered research questions were ranked. Rating criteria weightings were: effect on equity 26.1%; potential to reduce disease burden 20.5%; effectiveness 20.0%; deliverability 17.9%; and answerability 16.0%. All of the top 20 prioritised research questions directly related to Maori and/or Pacific health and predominantly involved research into healthcare systems and workforce rather than disease conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This project has identified the most important questions for future clinical trials and large cohort studies addressing maternal and perinatal health and healthcare in Aotearoa New Zealand. The Framework and methodology can be adapted for use across all areas of health.

Use of healthcare resources and family planning methods 12 months after birth in women of South Auckland: The Healthy Mums and Babies (HUMBA) randomised trial.

AIM: To report the utilisation of healthcare and family planning methods by participants in the Healthy Mums and Babies (HUMBA) trial at 12 months postpartum. METHODS: Surveys on access to 1) healthcare, and 2) family planning methods were completed 1 year following birth by a sample of multi-ethnic women with obesity in South Auckland, New Zealand. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven out of two hundred and thirty (55.2%) HUMBA participants completed the surveys. All babies and 99% of the mothers were enrolled with a general practitioner (GP) and over 60% also accessed community or hospital emergency departments. One hundred and twelve (88.2%) used Plunket as their Well Child provider. A discussion on family planning/contraception during or after pregnancy occurred for 123/127 (96.9%) but only 74/127 (58.3%) had family planning/contraception provided after birth. Of the 53 who did not have a family planning/contraception method arranged, 20 (37.7%) did not believe in them. Factors that participants felt would assist access to family planning/contraception services included home visits, weekend or after-hour clinics and a local or mobile clinic. CONCLUSIONS: In this South Auckland population, engagement with primary healthcare and Well Child health providers was almost universal. Family planning/contraception discussions during or after pregnancy were done well. However, provision of family planning/contraception services postpartum could be improved.

Pregnancy outcomes in women with booking HbA1c ≤ 40 mmol/mol compared with 41-49 mmol/mol in South Auckland, New Zealand.

AIMS: There are few data on pregnancy outcomes in women with pre-diabetes (HbA1c 41-49 mmol/mmol) at pregnancy booking. We aimed to (i) identify the proportion of women in Counties Manukau Health (CMH), South Auckland, New Zealand (NZ), with pre-diabetes at booking and (ii) compare outcomes between women with normal HbA1c and pre-diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from a multi-ethnic population of 10,869 singleton pregnancies, booked at <20 weeks from January 2017 to December 2018 in CMH, we compared outcomes between those with normal HbA1c (≤40 mmol/mol) and those with pre-diabetes (HbA1c 41-49 mmol/mol). The primary outcomes were gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by NZ criteria and large for gestational age (LGA) defined as birthweight >90th customised centile. Logistic regression determined the contribution of HbA1c 41-49 mmol/mol to the development of GDM. RESULTS: Among 10,869 participants, 193 (1.78%) had an HbA1c 41-49 mmol/mol at <20 weeks' gestation. Those with HbA1c 41-49 mmol/mol were 11 times more likely to develop GDM (59.6 vs 7.9%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 11.16 (7.59, 16.41)) and were more likely to have an LGA baby (47 (24.4%) vs 1436 (13.5%) aOR 1.63 (1.10, 2.41)) versus those with normal HbA1c. They also had significantly higher rates of pre-eclampsia, caesarean sections, preterm births and perinatal deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly two-thirds of women with a booking HbA1c of 41-49 mmol/mmol developed GDM as well as multiple other perinatal complications compared to women with HbA1c ≤40. Trials to evaluate the impact of treatment in early pregnancy on the risk of late-pregnancy complications are required.

Randomised controlled trial of paracetamol or ibuprofen, as required for fever and pain in the first year of life, for prevention of asthma at age 6 years: paracetamol or ibuprofen in the primary prevention of asthma in Tamariki (PIPPA Tamariki) protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma is one of the most common diseases in the world and is a global public health burden. There is an urgent need for research that leads to evidenced-based primary prevention strategies to reduce the prevalence of asthma. One novel risk factor that might have a role in the pathogenesis of asthma is the use of paracetamol in early life. This trial aims to determine if paracetamol, compared with ibuprofen use, as required for fever and pain in the first year of life, increases the risk of asthma at age 6 years. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in Primary Prevention of Asthma in Tamariki trial is a multicentre, open-label, two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial. 3922 infants born at ≥32 weeks' gestation will be randomly allocated to receive only paracetamol or only ibuprofen for treatment of fever and pain, if required in the first year of life. The primary outcome is asthma at 6 years of age, defined as the presence of wheeze in the preceding 12 months. Secondary outcomes include hospital admissions for bronchiolitis, wheeze or asthma in the first year of life, and within the first 6 years of life; wheeze at 3 years of age; eczema within the first year and at 3 and 6 years of age; atopy at 3 and 6 years of age. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by the Northern A Health and Disability Ethics Committee of New Zealand (17/NTA/233). Dissemination plans include publication in international peer-reviewed journals, and presentation at national and international scientific meetings, assimilation into national and international guidelines, and presentation of findings to lay audiences through established media links. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12618000303246; Pre-results.

The Pacific-specific CREBRF rs373863828 allele protects against gestational diabetes mellitus in Maori and Pacific women with obesity.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The CREBRF rs373863828 minor (A) allele is associated with increased BMI but reduced prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Maori and Pacific people. Given the shared aetiology of type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), we tested for an association between the CREBRF rs373863828 variant and GDM. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of Maori and Pacific women nested within a nutritional intervention study for pregnant women with obesity. Women were enrolled at 12-17 weeks' gestation and underwent anthropometry and collection of buffy coats for later genetic testing. GDM was diagnosed by 75 g OGTT at 24-28 weeks' gestation using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. Genotyping was performed by real-time PCR with a custom CREBRF rs373863828 probe-set. The association between CREBRF rs373863828 and GDM was analysed separately by ethnic group using logistic regression, with effect estimates combined in a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 112 Maori and Pacific pregnant women with obesity, 31 (28%) carried the CREBRF rs373863828 A allele (A/G or A/A) and 35 (31%) developed GDM. Women who carried the CREBRF rs373863828 A allele did not differ in BMI when compared with non-carriers (G/G). There was a fivefold reduction in the likelihood of GDM per CREBRF rs373863828 A allele (OR 0.19 [95% CI 0.05, 0.69], p = 0.01), independent of age, BMI and family history of diabetes (adjusted OR 0.13 [95% CI 0.03, 0.53], p = 0.004). GDM was diagnosed in 10% and 40% of women with and without the CREBRF rs373863828 A allele, respectively (no woman with the A/A genotype developed GDM). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The CREBRF rs373863828 (A) allele is associated with reduced likelihood of GDM in Maori and Pacific women with obesity and may improve GDM risk prediction. Graphical abstract.

Probiotic treatment for women with gestational diabetes to improve maternal and infant health and well-being.

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is carbohydrate intolerance first recognised during pregnancy and associated with complications for mothers and babies. Probiotics are naturally occurring micro-organisms, which when ingested in adequate amounts, may confer health benefits. Evidence of the role of probiotics as treatment for GDM is limited. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of probiotics in treating women with GDM on maternal and infant outcomes. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (24 July 2019), and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of probiotics versus placebo/standard care for the treatment of GDM. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data, checked data accuracy, and assessed risk of bias of included trials. The certainty of evidence for selected maternal and infant/child outcomes was assessed using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: Nine RCTs (695 pregnant women with GDM) comparing probiotics versus placebo were identified. The overall risk of bias in the nine RCTs was low to unclear and the evidence was downgraded for imprecision due to the small numbers of women participating in the trials. The trials were carried out in hospitals and universities in Iran (seven trials), Thailand (one trial) and Ireland (one trial). All trials compared probiotics with placebo. Maternal outcomes We are uncertain if probiotics have any effect compared with placebo on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, (risk ratio (RR) 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 3.53; participants = 256; studies = 3; low-certainty evidence) and mode of birth as caesareans (average RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.35; participants = 267; studies = 3; low-certainty evidence) because the certainty of evidence is low and the 95% CIs span possible benefit and possible harm. No trials reported primary outcomes of: mode of birth as vaginal/assisted and subsequent development of type 2 diabetes. We are uncertain if probiotics have any effect compared with placebo on induction of labour (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.37; participants = 127; studies = 1; very low-certainty evidence). For other secondary maternal outcomes, we are uncertain if there are differences between probiotics and placebo for: postpartum haemorrhage; weight gain during pregnancy intervention and total gestational weight gain; fasting plasma glucose and need for extra pharmacotherapy (insulin). Probiotics may be associated with a slight reduction in triglycerides and total cholesterol. In probiotics compared with placebo, there was evidence of reduction in markers for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and HOMA-B; and insulin secretion. There was also an increase in quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI). Probiotics were associated with minor benefits in relevant bio-markers with evidence of a reduction in inflammatory markers high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and marker of oxidative stress malondialdehyde; and an increase in antioxidant total glutathione, but we are uncertain if there is any difference in total antioxidant capacity. No trials reported secondary outcomes: perineal trauma, postnatal weight retention or return to pre-pregnancy weight and postnatal depression. Infant/child/adult outcomes We are uncertain if probiotics have any effect, compared with placebo, on the risk of large-for-gestational-age babies (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.52; participants = 174; studies = 2; low-certainty evidence) or infant hypoglycaemia (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.84; participants = 177; studies = 3; low-certainty evidence) because the certainty of evidence is low and the 95% CIs span possible benefit and possible harm. No trials reported primary outcomes of: perinatal (fetal/neonatal) mortality; or neurosensory disability. For other secondary outcomes, we are uncertain if there is any difference between probiotics and placebo in gestational age at birth, preterm birth, macrosomia, birthweight, head circumference, length, infant hypoglycaemia, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. There was evidence of a reduction in infant hyperbilirubinaemia with probiotics compared with placebo. No trials reported secondary outcomes: infant adiposity, and later childhood adiposity. There were no adverse events reported by any of the trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Low-certainty evidence means we are not certain if there is any difference between probiotic and placebo groups in maternal hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, caesareans; and large-for-gestational-age babies. There were no adverse events reported by the trials. Due to the variability of probiotics used and small sample sizes of trials, evidence from this review has limited ability to inform practice. Well-designed adequately-powered trials are needed to identify whether probiotics may improve maternal blood glucose levels and/or infant/child/adult outcomes; and whether they can be used to treat GDM.

An analysis of omega-3 fatty acid status in a population of pregnant women with obesity, at higher risk of preterm birth.

An updated Cochrane Review showed that maternal supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids reduced preterm birth, offering a potential strategy for prevention. We hypothesised that pregnant women with obesity, at higher risk of preterm birth, would have low omega-3 fatty acid levels and may benefit from supplementation. Our study measured the omega-3 fatty acid levels of 142 participants from the Healthy Mums and Babies study, Counties Manukau, Auckland, New Zealand. Counties Manukau is a multi-ethnic community with high rates of socio-economic deprivation, obesity, and preterm birth. Red blood cell omega-3 fatty acid levels were measured from samples collected between 120 and 176 weeks' gestation. Contrary to our hypothesis, participants in our study had similar or higher levels of omega-3 fatty acids to those reported in pregnant populations in Australia, Norway, China, and Germany. Our findings emphasise the importance of testing omega-3 fatty acid status before supplementing groups at risk of preterm birth.

Probiotics and Maternal Mental Health: A Randomised Controlled Trial among Pregnant Women with Obesity.

Poor maternal mental health has been associated with a myriad of pregnancy and child health complications. Obesity in pregnancy is known to increase one's risk of experiencing poor maternal mental health and associated physical and mental health complications. Probiotics may represent a novel approach to intervene in poor mental health and obesity. We conducted this pre-specified secondary analysis of the Healthy Mums and Babies (HUMBA) randomised controlled trial to investigate whether probiotics would improve maternal mental health outcomes up to 36 weeks of pregnancy. Two-hundred-and-thirty pregnant women with obesity (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2) were recruited and randomised to receive probiotic (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium lactis BB12, minimum 6.5 × 109 CFU) or placebo capsules. Depression, anxiety, and functional health and well-being were assessed at baseline (120-176 weeks' gestation) and 36 weeks of pregnancy. Depression scores remained stable and did not differ between the probiotic (M = 7.18, SD = 3.80) and placebo groups (M = 6.76, SD = 4.65) at 36 weeks (p-values > 0.05). Anxiety and physical well-being scores worsened over time irrespective of group allocation, and mental well-being scores did not differ between the two groups at 36 weeks. Probiotics did not improve mental health outcomes in this multi-ethnic cohort of pregnant women with obesity.

Gestational weight gain in a multi-ethnic sample of pregnant women from Counties Manukau Health, Auckland, New Zealand.

AIM: High and low gestational weight gain (GWG) adversely affects perinatal outcomes, and impacts long-term maternal and child health. Our aim is to report i) GWG categories by 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines in the multi-ethnic population in Counties Manukau Health, ii) demographic factors and iii) adverse perinatal outcomes associated with high and low GWG. METHOD: Women with singleton pregnancy and weight recorded at ≤20 weeks and again in the third trimester comprised the study population. GWG categories (weight gain per week) were defined as low, normal or high. Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes were compared between GWG categories. RESULTS: Study population comprised 604 women: 39.7% Pacific, 19.9% Maori, 21.5% European. 70.5% were overweight or obese, and 65.1% lived in the highest deprivation decile areas. 70.7% had high, 16.1% had normal and 13.2% had low GWG. Pacific [OR 3.58 (95% CI 1.82, 7.03)] had increased odds of high GWG and Para 2/3+ had reduced odds of high GWG [OR 0.50 (95% CI 0.26, 0.99), OR 0.36 (95% CI 0.17, 0.74) respectively]. Low GWG was associated with increased SGA [ OR 2.48 (95% CI 1.11, 6.44)] and with GDM [OR 2.74 (95%CI 1.06, 8.79)]. We demonstrated a linear association between GWG and birthweight with 126g (95% CI: 90g, 162g) increase per 250g increase in weekly GWG. CONCLUSION: The majority of participants had high GWG, which is clinically relevant as this was associated with increased infant weight, with potential to perpetuate intergenerational obesity. The association between low GWG and GDM may reflect care in the GDM clinic.

Effect of antenatal dietary interventions in maternal obesity on pregnancy weight-gain and birthweight: Healthy Mums and Babies (HUMBA) randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy interventions that improve maternal and infant outcomes are urgently needed in populations with high rates of obesity. We undertook the Healthy Mums and Babies (HUMBA) randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of dietary interventions and or probiotics in a multiethnic population of pregnant women with obesity, living in an area of high deprivation. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a culturally tailored dietary intervention and or daily probiotic capsules in pregnant women with obesity reduces the co-primary outcomes of (1) excessive gestational weight gain (mean >0.27 kg/week) and (2) birthweight. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a 2 × 2 factorial, randomized controlled trial in women without diabetes at pregnancy booking, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, and a singleton pregnancy. At 12+0 to 17+6 weeks' gestation, eligible women were randomized to a dietary intervention (4 tailored educational sessions at ≤28 weeks' gestation by a community health worker trained in key aspects of pregnancy nutrition plus text messaging until birth) or to routine dietary advice; and to daily capsules containing either (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium lactis BB12, minimum 6.5 × 109 colony forming units), or placebo, until birth. Analysis was by intention to treat with adjustment for maternal baseline body mass index. Infant outcomes were additionally adjusted for ethnicity, sex, and gestational age at birth. RESULTS: In total, 230 women were recruited between April 2015 and June 2017 (dietary intervention N = 116 vs routine dietary advice N = 114; probiotics N = 115 vs placebo N = 115). Baseline characteristics and demographic variables were similar across all groups. There was no significant difference between intervention groups, for the co-primary outcomes of (1) proportion of women with excessive gestational weight gain (dietary intervention vs routine advice: 79/107 [73.8%] vs 90/110 [81.8%], adjusted relative risk [relative risk, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.05]; probiotics versus placebo: 89/108 [82.4%] and 80/109 [73.4%], relative risk, 1.14, 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.31) or (2) birthweight (dietary intervention vs routine advice: 3575 vs 3612 g, adjusted mean difference, -24 g, 95% confidence interval, -146 to 97; probiotics vs placebo: 3685 vs 3504 g, adjusted mean difference, 107 g, 95% confidence interval, -14 to 228). Total maternal weight gain, a secondary outcome, was lower with dietary intervention compared with routine dietary advice (9.7 vs 11.4 kg, adjusted mean difference, -1.76, 95% confidence interval, -3.55 to 0.03). There were no significant differences between intervention groups in other secondary maternal or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although dietary education and or probiotics did not alter rates of excessive gestational weight gain or birthweight in this multiethnic, high-deprivation population of pregnant women with obesity, dietary education was associated with a modest reduction in total weight gain with potential future benefit for the health of mothers and their offspring if sustained.

Correction to: A randomised controlled demonstration trial of multifaceted nutritional intervention and or probiotics: the healthy mums and babies (HUMBA) trial.

In our 'Primary Outcomes' we made a typographical error [1]; the mean weekly weight gain should read >0.27 kg instead of >0.22 kg. The 'Primary Outcomes' should read as follows.

Accuracy of point-of-care HbA1c testing in pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: In New Zealand, it is recommended that all pregnant women have a haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) test performed with their booking antenatal bloods to identify previously unrecognised diabetes. However, screening rates in some groups are low. Use of a point-of-care device may improve compliance with screening. AIM: To assess the accuracy of the COBAS b101 point-of-care system referenced against a laboratory method, for measurement of HbA1c levels in pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Convenience sample of 40 obese pregnant women enrolled in a clinical trial. HbA1c was assayed in paired capillary and venous whole blood samples using the COBAS b101 point-of-care system and Primus Ultra2 high performance liquid chromatography laboratory analyser, respectively. The accuracy of the point-of-care system was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The mean (SD) laboratory HbA1c was 35.9 (2.0) mmol/mol. The COBAS b101 point-of-care system, compared with the laboratory reference method, had a small negative bias for HbA1c (-1.0 mmol/mol, 95% CI -2.0 to -0.03, P = 0.03) and relatively wide 95% limits of agreement (-7.2 to 5.1 mmol/mol). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we found that in pregnancy, the COBAS b101 point-of-care system has a small negative bias and modest point accuracy for HbA1c. When used to screen for previously unrecognised diabetes in pregnancy, appropriate COBAS b101 HbA1c point-of-care HbA1c thresholds for a negative and positive result are 7 mmol/mol below and 5 mmol/mol above the clinical threshold, respectively. Values between these limits should be confirmed by laboratory testing.

A randomised controlled demonstration trial of multifaceted nutritional intervention and or probiotics: the healthy mums and babies (HUMBA) trial.

BACKGROUND: Maternal obesity is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and has lifelong negative implications for offspring health. The Institute of Medicine recommends limited gestational weight gain (GWG) in obese women for optimal maternal and infant outcomes. However, there is a gap regarding an effective and sustainable intervention strategy to achieve this goal. The aim of the healthy mums and babies (HUMBA) demonstration trial is to assess whether a multifaceted nutritional intervention and/or an oral probiotic treatment in obese pregnant women can reduce excessive GWG and optimise pregnancy outcomes. METHODS AND DESIGN: The study is a two by two factorial randomised controlled demonstration trial conducted in Counties Manukau health region, New Zealand, a multi-ethnic region with a high prevalence of obesity. A total of 220 non-diabetic obese women with a singleton pregnancy will be recruited between 120 and 176 weeks. At recruitment, women are randomised to receive either a culturally tailored multifaceted dietary intervention or routine dietary advice, and either an oral probiotic or placebo capsule. Randomisation is undertaken via a web-based protocol, randomize.net, with a 1:1 ratio using stratification by body mass index (BMI) category (BMI of 30-34.9 or BMI ≥35 kg/m2). The dietary intervention includes 4 customised nutrition education visits by a trained community health worker combined with motivational text messaging. Probiotic capsules consist of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium lactis BB12 at a dose of 7 × 109 colony-forming units one per day until birth. Probiotic and placebo capsules are identically pre-packed and labelled by a third party, and are prescribed in a double blinded fashion. Research assessments are conducted at enrolment, 28 weeks, 36 weeks, at birth and at 5 months post-delivery. The primary outcomes for the study are proportion of women with excessive GWG and infant birthweight. DISCUSSION: The HUMBA demonstration trial will assess the efficacy of a culturally tailored multifaceted dietary intervention and probiotic treatment in limiting excessive GWG and optimising birthweight in a multiethnic sample of obese pregnant women. If successful, either one or both of the interventions may be incorporated into future studies powered to investigate important pregnancy outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry registration number: ACTRN12615000400561 , Universal Trial Number: U1111-1155-0409. Date registered: 29th April 2015.