Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
3.
J Bioeth Inq ; 13(2): 173-8, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27048423

ABSTRACT

A major appellate court decision from the United States seriously questions the legal sufficiency of prevailing medical criteria for the determination of death by neurological criteria. There may be a mismatch between legal and medical standards for brain death, requiring the amendment of either or both. In South Australia, a Bill seeks to establish a legal right for a defined category of persons suffering unbearably to request voluntary euthanasia. However, an essential criterion of a voluntary decision is that it is not tainted by undue influence, and this Bill falls short of providing adequate guidance to assess for undue influence.


Subject(s)
Advance Directives/legislation & jurisprudence , Brain Death/diagnosis , Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary , Terminal Care , Brain Death/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethics, Medical , Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary/ethics , Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary/legislation & jurisprudence , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Supreme Court Decisions , Terminal Care/ethics , Terminal Care/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...