Mechanisms by which sleep disturbance contributes to osteoarthritis pain: a conceptual model.

Sleep disturbance is prevalent in aging and painful rheumatologic populations, but it has largely been a neglected dimension of the routine clinical care of arthritis patients. Pain associated with osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and factors that contribute to pain in OA are poorly understood. Sleep disturbance is not only a consequence of pain, it is also likely to play an integral role in pain expression. Emerging research suggests that many patients with OA demonstrate signs of generalized hyperalgesia and faulty central pain modulatory processing similar to other idiopathic pain disorders, such as fibromyalgia. Sleep disruption is increasingly recognized as a direct contributor to both hyperalgesia and impaired endogenous pain modulation. This article reviews the extant literature on sleep disturbance and hyperalgesia in patients with OA. We propose a conceptual working model describing pathways by which sleep disturbance interacts directly with central pain processing mechanisms and inflammatory processes, and indirectly with mood and physical functioning to augment clinical OA pain. The clinical and research implications of the model are discussed.

The Time of Day Sleepiness Scale to assess differential levels of sleepiness across the day.

OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated the Time of Day Sleepiness Scale (ToDSS) to determine subjective estimates of sleepiness in the morning, afternoon, and evening. Scores on the ToDSS were compared to the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The ToDSS was evaluated on three cohorts of patients at a sleep medicine clinic. METHOD: The items of the ToDSS are modified from the ESS to enable subjective assessment in the morning (before noon), afternoon (noon to 1800 h), and evening (after 1800 h). The scale takes about 5 min to complete. For each item, patients provide an estimate of their level of sleepiness in three separate columns, each indicating the time of day (morning, afternoon, and evening). RESULTS: Each ToDSS score evidenced a one factor structure. The ToDSS enabled the assessment of differential levels of sleepiness across the day among several cohorts, with scores increasing in the afternoon and evening. The ESS and each score of the ToDSS demonstrated high correlations. Lower subjective estimates of sleepiness were documented after treatment with continuous positive airway pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The ToDSS was shown to have comparable psychometric features to the ESS and provided perceived sleepiness levels across the day in an efficient and cost-effective manner. It also enabled characterization of treatment response among a cohort of patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Longitudinal comparison study of pressure relief (C-Flex) vs. CPAP in OSA patients.

BACKGROUND: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices with the option of flexible pressure delivery (e.g., C-Flex) are thought to provide an improved degree of comfort and result in better therapeutic adherence while maintaining standard CPAP efficacy. The purpose of this study was to compare adherence and subjective measures of comfort between C-Flex and CPAP treatment. METHODS: The study was an international, multisite, single-blinded study with participants randomized to either C-Flex or CPAP. Participants completed subjective measures of sleepiness and comfort at baseline, and at 30-, 90-, and 180-day follow-ups. Additionally, compliance data were downloaded from the device at each follow-up. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to assess the effects of treatment. RESULTS: There were 138 men and 46 women (average age of 48 +/- 9.2, average Epworth Sleepiness Scale score of 14.9 +/- 3.6, and average diagnostic apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) of 51.9 +/- 27.7). C-Flex and CPAP groups were comparable on baseline measures, achieved comparable AHI on titration, and had comparable PAP pressure requirements. C-Flex users had comparable average hours of use per night and total nights of use across the study, but had a trend (p < .07) toward achieving greater total hours of utilization. While both groups had comparable decreases in sleepiness, C-Flex users reported on visual analog scales greater comfort (64.3 vs. 57.4; p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that C-Flex has comparable resolution of respiratory indices and adherence. Furthermore, C-Flex users reported greater mask comfort.