ABSTRACT
Diagnosing acute pancreatitis induced by any drug is often overlooked and warrants careful evaluation. Drug-induced acute pancreatitis is relatively rare, and diagnosis of exclusion after ruling out alcohol, gallstones, hypertriglyceridemia, and intervention. Levofloxacin, a class of fluoroquinolones, is generally recommended against various bacterial infections. While levofloxacin is mainly known for its potential side effects, such as photosensitivity and liver toxicity, it can also rarely induce acute pancreatitis. We report a case of acute pancreatitis in a female patient precipitated by levofloxacin. The patient exhibited typical manifestations of acute pancreatitis and had been taking levofloxacin for a urinary tract infection over the past three days. After ruling out other possible causes, her clinical presentation, laboratory results, and imaging findings confirmed levofloxacin-induced acute pancreatitis.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine perceptions of COVID-19 related to prevention, coping, and testing of African American residents in under-resourced communities in Alabama. DESIGN: Guided by the PRECEDE-PROCEED model, virtual focus groups were conducted in five urban and rural Alabama communities using secure Zoom meetings. Community residents and stakeholders (N = 36 total) participated; meetings were audio- and video-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed according to Thematic Analysis. Themes were organized by the PRECEDE portion of the model in Predisposing, Reinforcing, and Enabling barriers and facilitators in three focus areas: prevention, coping, and testing. RESULTS: Prevention barriers included apathy, difficulty with social distancing, lack of information, mixed messages from authority figures, and lack of personal protective equipment (PPE). Prevention facilitators included concerns about contracting COVID-19, clear and consistent messages from trusted sources, contact tracing, and the provision of PPE. Coping barriers included food insecurity, mental health issues, isolation, economic hardships, lack of health care access, and issues with virtual schooling and church services, which were exacerbated by the inability to connect to the internet. Facilitators to coping included religious faith, increased physical activity, and a sense of hope. Testing barriers included misunderstanding, fear, mistrust, testing restrictions, and location of testing sites. Facilitators to testing included incentives, clear information from trusted sources, convenient testing locations, and free tests. CONCLUSION: Gaining community members' perspectives can identify barriers and facilitators to prevention, coping, and testing and potentially improve outcomes. While addressing the social determinants of health (e.g. income, education, medical trust) would be an effective path by which to diminish health disparities related to COVID-19, there is an urgent need to mitigate the spread and severity of COVID-19 in vulnerable populations. Interventions should focus on downstream determinants, such as those emerging from our study.
