Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Reprod Health ; 15(1): 106, 2018 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29879992

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: One of the major reproductive health challenges among disadvantaged populations is to provide pregnant women with the necessary antenatal care (ANC). In this study, we suggest applying an integrated conceptual framework aimed at ascertaining the extent to which attendance at ANC clinics may be attributed to individual determinants or to the quality of the care received. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected from a sample of 831 women residing in nine sub-districts in three northern governorates of Jordan and designated according to national categorization as persistent poverty pockets. All of the sampled women were recruited from public maternal and child health centers and interviewed using a structured pre-tested survey. This tool covered certain predictors, ranging from the user's attributes, including predisposing, enabling, and need factors, to the essential components of the experience of care. These components assessed the quality of ANC in terms of five elements: woman-provider relations, technical management, information exchange, continuity of care, and appropriate constellation of services. Adequate ANC content was assessed in relation to the frequency of antenatal visits and the time of each visit. RESULTS: The results of multivariate logistic regression analyses show that the use of ANC facilities is affected by various factors related to the quality of service delivery. These include receiving information and education on ANC during clinic visits (OR = 9.1; 95% CI = 4.9-16.9), providing pregnant women with opportunities for dialogue and health talks (OR = 7.2; 95% CI = 4.1-12.8), having scheduled follow-up appointments (OR = 6.5; 95% CI = 3.5-12.0), and offering dignified and respectful care (OR = 5.7; 95% CI = 2.5-13.1). At the individual level, our findings have identified a woman's education level (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.1-1.3), desire for the pregnancy (OR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.1-2.7), and living in a district served by an ANC clinic (OR = 4.3; 95% CI = 2.3-8.1) as determinants affecting ANC utilization. CONCLUSION: Taking women's experiences of ANC as a key metric for reporting the quality of the care is more likely to lead to increased utilization of ANC services by women in highly disadvantaged communities. Our findings suggest that the degree to which women feel that they are respected, informed, and engaged in their care has potential favorable implications for ANC.


Subject(s)
Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Pregnant Women/psychology , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Jordan , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women/ethnology , Socioeconomic Factors , Vulnerable Populations , Young Adult
2.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J ; 17(4): e436-e443, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29372086

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Counselling plays a key role in enhancing reproductive services, providing contraception-related information and supporting long-term family planning for women of childbearing age. This study aimed to evaluate family planning counselling sessions in selected governmental and private clinics in northern Jordan. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted between January and June 2016 in Irbid, Jordan. A total of 200 women attending two private clinics affiliated with the Jordanian Association for Family Planning and Protection (JAFPP) and six governmental clinics were invited to participate in the study. Counselling sessions were attended by an independent observer and evaluated with regards to their compliance with the standard Greet, Ask, Tell, Help, Explain, Return (GATHER) framework. RESULTS: A total of 198 women participated in the study (response rate: 99.0%), including 80 women (40.4%) from JAFPP clinics and 118 (59.6%) from governmental clinics. In total, 42.9% of the counselling sessions were deemed adequate, with providers applying 80% or more of the GATHER framework, while 26.8% of the sessions were deemed semi-adequate and 30.3% were considered inadequate. Counselling services provided in the governmental clinics were significantly less adequate than those provided in JAFPP clinics (P <0.001). CONCLUSION: The quality of counselling services in governmental family planning centres in Jordan needs to be improved to ensure that women receive the highest possible level of care. Healthcare policymakers should therefore focus on developing and supporting effective family planning counselling services in northern Jordan.


Subject(s)
Counseling/standards , Family Planning Services/standards , Program Evaluation/methods , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities/organization & administration , Ambulatory Care Facilities/standards , Contraception/statistics & numerical data , Counseling/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family Planning Services/methods , Female , Humans , Jordan , Middle Aged , Sex Education/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...