Efficacy of Combined Pembrolizumab and Pelvic Radiotherapy for Bladder Cancer With Rectal Metastases.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Rectal metastases from urothelial carcinoma (UC) are extremely rare with poor prognosis when treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and total pelvic exenteration. Long-term survival has not been observed in patients treated with GC chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or total pelvic resection. However, there have been no reports on the efficacy of pembrolizumab therapy for this specific condition. Herein, we describe a case of rectal metastasis from UC, treated with combined pembrolizumab and pelvic radiotherapy. CASE REPORT: A 67-year-old male patient with an invasive bladder tumour underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion followed by neoadjuvant GC chemotherapy. The pathological findings showed high-grade UC, pT4a, with a negative surgical margin. He presented with an impacted ileus due to severe rectal stenosis on postoperative day 35 and underwent a colostomy. Pathologically, rectal biopsy confirmed rectal metastasis; thus, the patient was started on pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks and pelvic radiotherapy with a total dose of 45 Gy. The rectal metastases remained well controlled with stable disease status, and no adverse events were observed 10 months after the initiation of combined pembrolizumab and pelvic radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab combined with radiation therapy may be an alternative treatment for rectal metastases from UC.

A case of granular cell tumor of the bladder successfully managed with extraperitoneal laparoscopic surgery.

Granular cell tumor is a benign neoplasm which frequently occurs in the oral cavity, skin, and subcutaneous tissue. Granular cell tumor of the bladder is an extremely rare disease, and only nine cases have been reported. We present here an additional case of granular cell tumor occurring in the bladder. Unlike the other tumors reported, this tumor extruded into the Retzius' cavity. Therefore, the tumor was successfully excised through extraperitoneal laparoscopic surgery. The patient was free from recurrence 40 months after surgery. The small tumor located in Retzius' cavity could be managed with extraperitoneal laparoscopic surgery.

A case of leiomyosarcoma of the penis.

A case of leiomyosarcoma of the penis is reported. A 27-year-old-man presented to our department with a mass at the root of the penis. Biopsy of the tumor showed that the tumor was leiomyosarcoma. The tumor was clinically and pathologically categorized into the deep type. Despite total penectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy, the patient died from disseminated disease 14 months after surgery. This is the 45th case of penile leiomyosarcoma.

[Clinico-pathological investigation of upper urinary tract tumors in patients with normal renal function and in patients with end stage renal disease].

AIMS: To clinically investigate upper urinary tract tumors in end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1988 and 2003, a study was made of 153 patients who underwent surgical treatment for upper urinary tract tumors in the Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University. Of these, 10 had ESRD while 143 had normal renal function. Comparisons were made of the following variables between the two groups: patient's background, clinical findings, surgical procedures, pathological findings, prognosis, depth of tumor cell invasion, tumor grades, postoperative survival rates, cancer-specific survival rates, and complications. RESULTS: Ten ESRD patients with upper urinary tract tumors were comprised of 5 males and 5 females with a median age of 59 (40-71) years and an average hemodialysis period of 71 (0-279) months. Macroscopic hematuria appeared in seven cases (70%) at the onset, and tumors occurred at the renal pelvis in nine cases (90%). As to the T stage, seven cases (70%) were pT2 or more and all 10 cases (100%) exhibited grade 2 or higher in ESRD patients, yielding no significant differences with the cases of normal renal function. In addition, there was no significant difference in both groups with respect to postoperative survival rates and cancer-specific survival rates in cases with curative resection. CONCLUSION: Although upper urinary tract tumors had been considered to exhibit higher grades and stages of malignancy in ESRD cases than in those with normal renal function, the present results showed that the clinico-pathological features are similar in both patients groups. Given that there was no significant difference in postoperative survival rates and cancer-specific survival rates, radical surgery should be also indicated, if possible, for the ESRD patients with upper urinary tract tumors as well as the patients with normal renal function.

Retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN): establishment and initial experience of RPLDN at a single center.

We tried to establish the technique of retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN). Between July 2001 and March 2004, 135 renal transplant donors underwent RPLDN. Low (average: 7 mmHg) CO2 gas pressure was employed during the procedure. All procedures were performed through a three-port retroperitoneal approach without opening the peritoneal cavity. The hand-assisted technique was not used. One hundred and twenty-seven cases were of left and eight cases were of right nephrectomy. Donor nephrectomy was carried out successfully in all patients. In one donor, the procedure was changed to open donor nephrectomy because of severe adhesion around the renal vein due to previous surgery. No serious complications, such as massive bleeding or bowel injury were encountered. Return of bowel function took 0.7 days on average. Post-operative hospital stay was 4.9 days on average, and return to work was 12 days on average. Ureteral complications occurred in 2 patients and were treated with temporally retrograde ureteral stenting. Average serum creatinine levels were 1.5 mg/dL, 1.3 mg/dL and 1.3 mg/dL at 3, 7 and 14 days after transplantation, respectively. No patients required hemodialysis after transplantation due to acute tubular necrosis. RPLDN could be an option for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.