ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Group A streptococcus infection during pregnancy can be concerning. It may cause toxic shock syndrome, which can be fatal. Here, we report a rare case of a pregnant woman who developed infectious sacroiliitis due to group A streptococcus infection. To the best of our knowledge, this case is the first of its kind to be reported. CASE PRESENTATION: A 32-year-old multiparous Japanese woman presented with fever and right buttock pain at 28 weeks of gestation. Based on our clinical findings and investigations, she was diagnosed with group A streptococcus bacteremia and infectious sacroiliitis caused by group A streptococcus. A cardiotocography performed to assess the fetal status showed fetal tachycardia. To prevent the patient from progressing to toxic shock syndrome caused by group A streptococcus, we performed an emergency cesarean section. The patient and her infant had a good course after the cesarean section. CONCLUSION: A pregnant woman diagnosed with group A streptococcus infection needs to be monitored closely because a timely decision to deliver the fetus before rapid deterioration to toxic shock syndrome is crucial.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Sacroiliitis , Shock, Septic , Streptococcal Infections , Adult , Cesarean Section , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Sacroiliitis/diagnostic imaging , Sacroiliitis/drug therapy , Shock, Septic/diagnosis , Streptococcal Infections/complications , Streptococcal Infections/diagnosis , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Streptococcus pyogenesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to conduct a detailed survey of radical hysterectomy in Japanese patients with early-stage cervical cancer, and to compare oncologic outcomes between open and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. METHODS: In Japan during 2015, the medical records of 929 patients with FIGO stage IB1 and IIA disease treated with radical hysterectomy were retrospectively reviewed. We assessed patients' characteristics, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS: The median patient age was 44 (20-80) years. Most patients (94.4%) had stage IB1 disease. Of the patients who underwent radical hysterectomy, 91.2% underwent open surgery and 8.8% underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The median follow-up period was 40.8 months (range, 0.49-51.1 months). The rate of DFS and OS at 4 years in all patients was 88.3% and 96.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified age (≥ 47), adenocarcinoma histology, tumor size (≥ 2 cm), parametrial invasion, positive lymph node metastasis and institutional accreditation as independent predictors of recurrence, and adenocarcinoma, other cell types, and positive lymph node metastasis as independent predictors of death. Oncologic outcomes in all patients were similar between open and MIS, including DFS and OS. CONCLUSION: The survival rate of the Japanese patients underwent radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer was favorable. No significant differences were observed for DFS and OS between open and MIS performed by a limited number of surgeons at a limited number of facilities in Japan. Further investigations are required to identify the appropriate patients might benefit from MIS.
