Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 85: 229-235, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37995481

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is a significant predictor for physical and mental health problems later in life, especially during the perinatal period. Prenatal common mental disorders (PCMDs) are well-established as a risk for obstetric interventions but knowledge on combined effects of multiple psychosocial risk factors is sparse. We aim to examine a comprehensive model of ACEs and PCMDs as risk factors for poor delivery and neonatal outcomes. METHOD: With structural equation modeling, we examined direct and indirect pathways between psychosocial risk and delivery and neonatal outcomes in a prospective cohort from pregnancy to birth in Iceland. RESULTS: Exposure to ACEs increased risk of PCMDs [ß = 0.538, p < .001, CI: 0.195-1.154] and preterm delivery [ß = 0.768, p < .05, CI: 0.279-1.007)]. An indirect association was found between ACEs and increased risk of non-spontaneous delivery [ß = 0.054, p < .05, CI: 0.004-0.152], mediated by PCMDs. Identical findings were observed for ACEs subcategories. CONCLUSION: ACEs are strong predictors for mental health problems during pregnancy. Both ACEs and PCMDs diagnosis are associated with operative delivery interventions and neonatal outcomes. Findings underscore the importance of identifying high-risk women and interventions aimed at decreasing psychosocial risk during the prenatal period.


Subject(s)
Adverse Childhood Experiences , Mental Disorders , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Female , Mental Health , Prospective Studies , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Risk Factors
2.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 75(8): 559-567, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33840348

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate adults referred to a national ADHD clinic, by comparing those diagnosed with those who were not, and those who screened negative and to evaluate changes among those diagnosed at follow-up. METHOD: Data obtained from 531 patients' medical records (49.7% males). One hundred thirty-six screened negative, 395 positive and 305 met diagnostic criteria for ADHD. Eighty-three of them were contacted by phone at follow-up. RESULTS: ADHD diagnosis was associated with lower educational status and more concerns expressed by parents and teachers during childhood. Participants not diagnosed with ADHD more often met diagnostic criteria for dysthymia, agoraphobia and generalized anxiety, and were more likely to be diagnosed with two or more comorbid disorders. At follow-up, all reported a significant reduction of ADHD symptoms, irrespective of medication, but the medicated participants reported fewer symptoms of inattention and better functioning in daily life. CONCLUSION: Adults referred to ADHD clinics may have multiple mental health problems, regardless of whether they receive ADHD diagnosis or not. This could have implications for differential diagnoses of ADHD in adults and emphasises the need to have appropriate treatment available for both groups. Psychoeducation about ADHD may be very helpful in decreasing anxiety and ADHD symptoms.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Adult , Anxiety , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Iceland/epidemiology , Male , Parents
3.
Laeknabladid ; 106(3): 131-138, 2020.
Article in Icelandic | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32124736

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurodevelopmental disorder among children but symptoms may persist into adulthood. At Landspitali - the National University Hospital an interdisciplinary unit is responsible for ADHD-diagnosis and for commencing treatment of adult ADHD. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmaceu-tical treatment provided by the unit and the effects of psychiatric comorbidities. METHODS: The study is retrospective and includes all individuals ≥18 years of age who received pharmaceutical treatment in the adult ADHD unit at Landspitali 2015-2017. Individuals who had previously received treatment by the unit or were already on medication for ADHD were excluded. Information on symptoms and wellbeing before and after treatment were obtained from three questionnaires, an ADHD rating scale, DASS and QOLS. RESULTS: Of 211 patients who met inclusion criteria 144 (68%) completed the treatment provided by the unit on average 143 days. Impulsivity/hyperactivity predicted treatment failure with OR=0.96 (p=0.015). There was a statistically significant difference in all key response variables before and after pharmaceutical treatment (p<0.001). The Cohen's d effect size for ADHD variables were 3.18 for attention-deficit and 1.40 for impulsivity/hyperactivity. The effect size for quality of life was 1.00 and among the DASS subscales the maximum effect size was 1.43 for stress. Increased quality of life correlated with decreased symptoms as rated by DASS and the ADHD rating scale. Treatment success rates were significantly -higher for DASS but not for attention-deficit, impulsivity/hyperactivity and quality of life among individuals with psychiatric comorbidities alongside ADHD. Gender did not affect treatment effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Those who complete treatment within the ADHD unit achieve good results with decreased psychiatric symptoms and improved quality of life. Treatment discontinuation is a challenge.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Central Nervous System Stimulants , Adult , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Hospitals, University , Humans , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome
4.
Scand J Caring Sci ; 34(1): 167-180, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31218722

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although perinatal distress is acknowledged as a burdening condition for pregnant women, its effects on pregnancy are not well known. This study was conducted to increase knowledge regarding the effects of distress on pregnancy-related problems. The study also assessed women's need for sick leave and increased prenatal care due to distress, and the effects of weak social support and dissatisfaction with their partner relationships. METHODS: In total, 2523 women were screened for perinatal distress three times during pregnancy in this quantitative cohort study. Structured psychiatric interviews were conducted following the screening, with 562 of the participants. Data from participants' pregnancy records were also analysed. The study was conducted in primary healthcare centres in Iceland after receiving approval from the Icelandic National Bioethical Committee. The main outcome measures were pregnancy problems, sick leave issued and prenatal service needs. RESULTS: Data from 503 women were analysed. The perinatal distress group (PDG) was significantly more likely than was the nondistressed group (NDG) to experience fatigue, vomiting and pelvic pain after controlling for background variables. Distressed women who reported weak family support experienced symptoms of nausea and heartburn. The PDG needed more frequent prenatal care than did the NDG and was issued sick leave for up to 42 days longer. Dissatisfaction in the partner relationship and with the division of household tasks and childcare was strongly associated with distress, the development of complications and the need for sick leave. DISCUSSION: Identification of perinatal distress by midwives and other healthcare professionals is important, since distress may be linked to women's complaints of fatigue, vomiting, pelvic pain and need for prolonged sick leave, and additional prenatal care services will be needed. Perceived dissatisfaction in the partner relationship and with the division of household tasks should also form part of clinical practice and assistance provided.


Subject(s)
Health Services Needs and Demand , Personal Satisfaction , Pregnancy Complications , Sexual Partners , Sick Leave , Social Support , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Iceland , Pregnancy
5.
Midwifery ; 69: 45-51, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30396159

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Icelandic version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) when used prenatal, explore the dimensionality of the scale and describe its effectiveness in identifying depression. DESIGN: A sample of Icelandic women filled in the EPDS at week 16 gestation, week 24 and week 36. If screened positive in week 16 they were asked to attend a psychiatric diagnostic interview 2-4 weeks later. Every 10th woman screened negative was also asked to attend an interview. SETTING: Antenatal clinics at primary health care centres in Iceland. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 2512 women receiving prenatal care participated in the study. At week 16 gestation, 2397 women filled in the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, 2025 at week 25, and 1756 at week 36. 474 women attended diagnostic interview two to four weeks after screening. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: Internal reliability, convergent validity and test-retest correlation of the Icelandic version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale appeared acceptable. An exploratory factor analysis supported a one-factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale that was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis showing best fit for one general factor with two group factors. A cut-off score of 11 or higher had specificity of 0.89, sensitivity of 0.80 and positive predictive value of 0.44. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The Icelandic version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is a valid and reliable one-dimensional instrument suitable to screen for depression prenatally. We recommend using score 11 or higher as a cut-off. If women score 11, they should be re-assessed two weeks later, but if they score 12 or higher, they should be referred directly for a further assessment. A time gap of two to four weeks does weaken the scale's ability to discriminate between those suffering from Major Depression and those who screen negative.


Subject(s)
Pregnant Women/psychology , Prenatal Diagnosis/standards , Psychometrics/standards , Adult , Area Under Curve , Female , Humans , Iceland , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/methods , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/methods , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Translating
6.
Midwifery ; 69: 1-9, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30390461

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate possible associations between distress in pregnant women and their use of pain management and medical interventions. Furthermore, we assessed the effects of reported dissatisfaction in relationship with their partner, or weak social support. DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study. SETTING: Women were invited to participate while attending prenatal care at participating Icelandic health care centres. Birth outcome data were obtained from the hospitals where these women gave birth. PARTICIPANTS: Women in this study participated in a research project where 2523 women were screened three times during pregnancy for anxiety and depression. Women who had positive results at screening were invited to a semi-structured interview during pregnancy as well as every fourth woman who had negative results. Five hundred and sixty-two women participated in the interviews and the final sample was 442 women. MEASUREMENTS: Distress was defined as symptoms of anxiety, stress and depression. The Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS) were used for screening purposes. During the interview, the women answered the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and the Adverse Experienced Interview (AEI). The main outcome variables that were obtained from the women's childbirth records were: (1) use of pain management, categorized as: epidural analgesia, non-pharmacological pain management, nitrous oxide, pharmacological medication, or no pain management; (2) medical interventions categorized as: induction, stimulation, and episiotomy; and (3) mode of childbirth. A logistic regression analysis, adjusted for significant covariates, was conducted. FINDINGS: A significant association was found between perinatal distress at 16 weeks gestation and use of epidural as single pain management. Overall, distressed women were 2.6 times more likely than non-distressed women to use epidural as a single pain management. They were also less likely to go through childbirth without use of any pain management method. Women who were dissatisfied in their relationship were significantly more likely to undergo induction of childbirth, an episiotomy and/or a vacuum extraction than those who were satisfied in their relationship, regardless if they were distressed or not. No association was found between social support and the outcome variables. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Women with perinatal distress were more likely to use an epidural than non-distressed women. The use of an epidural might help them manage pain and uncertainties related to childbirth. Women who were dissatisfied in their partner relationship may be more likely to undergo induction of childbirth, episiotomy and/or vacuum extraction. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Midwives need to acknowledge the possible association of distress and use of an epidural during childbirth and screen for distress early in pregnancy. It is important to offer counselling and help during pregnancy for expectant parents who are distressed or dissatisfied in their relationship.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/standards , Interpersonal Relations , Pain Management/standards , Sexual Partners/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Analgesia, Epidural/methods , Analgesia, Epidural/psychology , Analgesia, Epidural/statistics & numerical data , Anxiety/complications , Anxiety/psychology , Cohort Studies , Delivery, Obstetric/psychology , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Depression/complications , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Iceland , Pain Management/methods , Pain Management/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Prenatal Care/methods , Prenatal Care/psychology , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/methods , Stress, Psychological/complications , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Arch Womens Ment Health ; 22(1): 75-83, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30056536

ABSTRACT

Risk factors for antenatal common mental problems include a history of depression, lack of social support and a history of both childhood and adulthood sexual and physical abuse. However, it is less clear whether pregnancy is a time of particular susceptibility to mental disorders due to prior childhood experiences. The aim of the paper was to investigate the potential pathways to antenatal mental health problems. A total of 521 women attending prenatal care attended a clinical interview and answered psychological questionnaires. Univariate analysis, sequential binary logistic regression and structural equation modelling (SEM) were used to analyse the relationships between variables. Having experienced parental maladjustment, maltreatment and serious physical illness in childhood and domestic violence, financial difficulties and serious spousal substance abuse in adulthood significantly predicted antenatal common mental health symptoms. SEM showed that history of depression and adverse experiences in adulthood had mediating effects on the relationship between adverse childhood events and symptoms of antenatal common mental disorders. Adverse childhood experiences are distal risk factors for antenatal common mental health problems, being significant indicators of history of depression and adverse experiences in adulthood. We therefore conclude that pregnancy is not a time of particular susceptibility to common mental health problems as a result of childhood abuse, but rather, these childhood experiences have increased the risk of adulthood trauma and prior mental disorders. Women at risk for antenatal common mental disorders include those with a history of depression, domestic violence, financial difficulties, spousal substance abuse and lack of social support.


Subject(s)
Adverse Childhood Experiences/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Iceland/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Risk Factors , Social Support , Young Adult
8.
Women Birth ; 30(1): e46-e55, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27616767

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is inferred that perinatal distress has adverse effects on the prospective mother and the health of the foetus/infant. More knowledge is needed to identify which symptoms of perinatal distress should be assessed during pregnancy and to shed light on the impact of women's satisfaction with their partner relationship on perinatal distress. AIM: The current study aimed to generate knowledge about the association of the partner relationship and social support when women are dealing with perinatal distress expressed by symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress. METHODS: A structured interview was conducted with 562 Icelandic women who were screened three times during pregnancy with the Edinburgh Depression Scale and the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale. Of these, 360 had symptoms of distress and 202 belonged to a non-distress group. The women answered the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support and the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. The study had a multicentre prospective design allowing for exploration of association with perinatal distress. FINDINGS: Women who were dissatisfied in their partner relationship were four times more likely to experience perinatal distress. Women with perinatal distress scored highest on the DASS Stress Subscale and the second highest scores were found on the Anxiety Subscale. CONCLUSION: Satisfaction in partner relationship is related to perinatal distress and needs to be assessed when health care professionals take care of distressed pregnant women, her partner and her family. Assessment of stress and anxiety should be included in the evaluation of perinatal distress, along with symptoms of depression.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/diagnosis , Depression/diagnosis , Pregnant Women/psychology , Prenatal Diagnosis/psychology , Social Support , Spouses , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Adult , Anxiety/psychology , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Iceland , Interpersonal Relations , Interviews as Topic , Mood Disorders/diagnosis , Mood Disorders/psychology , Mothers/psychology , Personal Satisfaction , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women/ethnology , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Risk Factors , Sexual Partners/psychology , Stress, Psychological/psychology
9.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 267(3): 267-276, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27752827

ABSTRACT

Studies assessing psychological treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults are increasingly reported. However, functional outcomes are often neglected in favour of symptom outcomes. We investigated functional outcomes in 95 adults with ADHD who were already treated with medication and randomized to receive treatment as usual (TAU/MED) or psychological treatment (CBT/MED) using a cognitive-behavioural programme, R&R2ADHD, which employs both group and individual modalities. RATE-S functional outcomes associated with ADHD symptoms, social functioning, emotional control and antisocial behaviour were given at baseline, end of treatment and three-month follow-up. The Total composite score of these scales is associated with life satisfaction. In addition, independent evaluator ratings of clinicians who were blind to treatment arm were obtained on the Clinical Global Impression scale at each time point. CBT/MED showed overall (combined outcome at end of treatment and 3-month follow-up) significantly greater functional improvement on all scales. Post-group treatment effects were maintained at follow-up with the exception of emotional control and the Total composite scales, which continued to improve. The largest treatment effect was for the RATE-S Total composite scale, associated with life satisfaction. CGI significantly correlated with all outcomes except for social functioning scale at follow-up. The study provides further evidence for the effectiveness of R&R2ADHD and demonstrates the importance of measuring functional outcomes. The key mechanism associated with improved functional outcomes is likely to be behavioural control.


Subject(s)
Antisocial Personality Disorder/epidemiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/rehabilitation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
10.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 75(4): 393-8, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24569071

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Few studies are available on the effectiveness of screening tools such as the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or the extent to which such tools may identify women with mental disorders other than depression. We therefore aimed to investigate the mental health characteristics of pregnant women who screen positive on the EPDS. METHOD: Consecutive women receiving antenatal care in primary care clinics (from November 2006 to July 2011) were invited to complete the EPDS in week 16 of pregnancy. All women who scored above 11 (screen positive) on the EPDS and randomly selected women who scored below 12 (screen negative) were invited to participate in a psychiatric diagnostic interview. RESULTS: 2,411 women completed the EPDS. Two hundred thirty-three women (9.7%) were screened positive in week 16, of whom 153 (66%) agreed to a psychiatric diagnostic interview. Forty-eight women (31.4%) were diagnosed with major depressive disorder according to DSM-IV criteria, 20 (13.1%) with bipolar disorder, 93 (60.8%) with anxiety disorders (including 27 [17.6%] with obsessive-compulsive disorder [OCD]), 8 (5.2%) with dysthymia, 18 (11.8%) with somatoform disorder, 3 (2%) with an eating disorder, and 7 (4.6%) with current substance abuse. Women who screened positive were significantly more likely to have psychosocial risk factors, including being unemployed (χ(2)(1) = 23.37, P ≤.001), lower educational status (χ(2)(1)= 31.68, P ≤ .001), and a history of partner violence (χ(2)(1) = 10.30, P ≤ 001), compared with the women who screened negative. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the EPDS early in the second trimester of pregnancy identifies a substantial number of women with potentially serious mental disorders other than depression, including bipolar disorder, OCD, and eating disorders. A comprehensive clinical assessment is therefore necessary following use of the EPDS during pregnancy to ensure that women who screen positive receive appropriate mental health management.


Subject(s)
Depression/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Adolescent , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depression/complications , Depression/drug therapy , Depression/psychology , Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Depression, Postpartum/psychology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Young Adult
11.
BMC Psychiatry ; 11: 116, 2011 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21787431

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adulthood is not fully treated by psychopharmacological treatment alone. The main aim of the current study was to evaluate a newly developed cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) based group programme, the Reasoning and Rehabilitation for ADHD Youths and Adults (R&R2ADHD), using a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: 54 adults with ADHD already receiving psychopharmacological treatment were randomly allocated to an experimental (CBT/MED) treatment condition (n = 27) and a 'treatment as usual' (TAU/MED) control condition (n = 27) that did not receive the CBT intervention. The outcome measures were obtained before treatment (baseline), after treatment and at three month follow-up and included ADHD symptoms and impairments rated by independent assessors, self-reported current ADHD symptoms, and comorbid problems. RESULTS: The findings suggested medium to large treatment effects for ADHD symptoms, which increased further at three month follow-up. Additionally, comorbid problems also improved at follow-up with large effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings give support for the effectiveness of R&R2ADHD in reducing ADHD symptoms and comorbid problems, an improving functions associated with impairment. The implications are that the benefits of R&R2ADHD are multifaceted and that combined psychopharmacological and CBT based treatments may add to and improve pharmacological interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12611000533998 (http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12611000533998.aspx).


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Combined Modality Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Psychotherapy, Group/statistics & numerical data , Self Report
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...